|
Volumn 26, Issue 3, 1993, Pages 633-674
|
Surrogate motherhood contracts: should the British or Canadian model fill the U.S. legislative vacuum?
a
a
NONE
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
ADVISORY COMMITTEE;
ALTRUISM;
ARTICLE;
CANADA;
CHILD PARENT RELATION;
CONTRACT;
FATHER;
FEE;
GENETICS AND REPRODUCTION;
GOVERNMENT;
GOVERNMENT REGULATION;
HUMAN RIGHTS;
INTERNATIONAL ASPECTS;
INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION;
JOHNSON V. CALVERT;
JUDICIAL ACTION;
JURISPRUDENCE;
LEGAL APPROACH;
LEGAL RIGHTS;
MOTHER;
MOTIVATION;
ONTARIO LAW REFORM COMMISSION;
POLICY;
REMUNERATION;
ROYAL COMMISSION ON NEW REPRODUCTIVE TECHNOLOGIES (CANADA);
SOCIAL CONTROL;
SOCIAL IMPACT;
SOCIOLOGY;
SURROGACY ARRANGEMENTS ACT 1985 (GREAT BRITAIN);
UNITED KINGDOM;
UNITED STATES;
WARNOCK COMMITTEE;
CANADA;
CONTRACTS;
FEDERAL GOVERNMENT;
GENETICS AND REPRODUCTION;
GOVERNMENT REGULATION;
GREAT BRITAIN;
INTERNATIONAL ASPECTS;
JOHNSON V. CALVERT;
JUDICIAL ACTION;
LEGAL APPROACH;
LEGAL RIGHTS;
ONTARIO LAW REFORM COMMISSION;
REMUNERATION;
ROYAL COMMISSION ON NEW REPRODUCTIVE TECHNOLOGIES (CANADA);
SOCIAL IMPACT;
SURROGACY ARRANGEMENTS ACT 1985 (GREAT BRITAIN);
UNITED STATES;
WARNOCK COMMITTEE;
ADVISORY COMMITTEES;
ALTRUISM;
CANADA;
CIVIL RIGHTS;
FATHERS;
FEES AND CHARGES;
GOVERNMENT;
GREAT BRITAIN;
INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION;
JURISPRUDENCE;
LEGISLATION;
MOTIVATION;
PARENT-CHILD RELATIONS;
PUBLIC POLICY;
SOCIAL CHANGE;
SOCIAL CONTROL, FORMAL;
STATE GOVERNMENT;
SURROGATE MOTHERS;
UNITED STATES;
|
EID: 0027903145
PISSN: 07484305
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: None Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (5)
|
References (0)
|