Comparison of marine gravity from shipboard and high‐density satellite altimetry along the Mid‐Atlantic Ridge, 30.5°–35.5°S

Geophysical Research Letters

Volumn 20, Issue 15, 1993, Pages 1639-1642

  Neumann, Gregory A ^a   Forsyth, Donald W ^a   Sandwell, David ^b  

^a BROWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BATHYMETRY; CRUSTAL STRUCTURE; GRAVITY; GRAVITY FIELD; METHOD VALIDATION; OCEAN RIDGE; SATELLITE ALTIMETRY; SHIPBOARD MEASUREMENT;

ATLANTIC, MID-ATLANTIC RIDGE;

EID: 0027843991     PISSN: 00948276     EISSN: 19448007     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1029/93GL01487     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Statistical features of sea‐floor topography
2. Isostatic compensation of tectonic features of the Mid‐Atlantic Ridge: 25‐27°30′ S
3. Gravity anomalies of the ridge‐transform system in the South Atlantic between 31 and 34.5° S: Upwelling centers and variations in crustal thickness
4. Evidence from gravity data for focused magmatic accretion along the Mid‐Atlantic Ridge
5. Mapping the Southwest Indian Ridge with Geosat
6. Gravity fields from Geosat and ERS‐1 satellite altimetry for geodynamic applications (abstract)
7. Applications of the POCS inversion method to interpolating topography and other geophysical fields
8. Three‐dimensional analysis of gravity anomalies in the MARK area, Mid‐Atlantic Ridge 23°N
9. Improvements in navigation using Sea Beam crossing errors
10. Improvements in survey navigation on the Mid‐Atlantic Ridge (30‐36 degrees S) using Sea Beam crossing adjustments (abstract)
11. The paradox of the axial profile: Isostatic compensation along the Mid‐Atlantic Ridge?
12. Antarctic marine gravity field from high‐density satellite altimetry
13. Global marine gravity from ERS‐1, Geosat, and Seasat reveals new tectonic fabric (abstract)
14. On the accuracy of Marine Gravity Fields calculated from satellite altimetry (abstract)
15. Free software helps map and display data