Value Orientations, Gender, and Environmental Concern

Environment and Behavior

Volumn 25, Issue 5, 1993, Pages 322-348

  Stern, Paul C ^a   Dietz, Thomas ^b   Kalof, Linda ^c  

^a NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL   (United States)

^b GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERN; GENDER STUDIES; MODELLING APPROACH; SOCIAL-PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; VALUE ORIENTATION;

EID: 0027754437     PISSN: 00139165     EISSN: 1552390X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0013916593255002     Document Type: Article

References (88)

1. Arcury, T. A., Scollay, S. J., & Johnson, T. P. (1987). Sex differences in environmental concern and knowledge. Sex Roles, 16, 463-472.
2. Armor, D. J. (1974). Theta reliability and factor scaling. In H. L. Costner (Ed.), Sociological methodology (pp. 17-50). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
3. Arrow, K. (1963). Social choice and individual values. New York: Wiley.
4. Arrow, K. (1975). Gifts and exchanges. In E. S. Phelps (Ed.), Altnuism, mortality, and economic theory. New York: Russell Sage.
5. Ausfin, W. (1979). Sex differences in bystander intervention in a theft. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 2110-2120.
6. Biehl, J. (1991). Rethinking ecofeminist politics. Boston: South End.
7. Black, J. S., Stem, P. C., & Elsworth, J. T. (1985). Personal and contextual influences on household energy adaptations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 70, 3-21.
8. Blocker, T. J. & Eckberg, D. L. (1989). Environmental issues as women's issues: General concerns and local hazards. Social Science Quarterly, 70, 586-593.
9. Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York: Academic Press.
10. Borden, R. J., & Francis, J. F. (1978). Who cares about ecology?: Personality and sex differences in environmental concern. Journal of Personality, 46, 190-203.
11. Boyd, R., & Richerson, P. J. (1985). Culture and the evolutionary process. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
12. Brennan, A. (1988). Thinking about nature: An investigation of nature, value and ecology. Athens: University of Georgia Press.
13. Brody, C. J. (1984). Sex differences in support for nuclear power. Social Forces, 63, 209-228.
14. Buchanan, J. M. (1954). Individual choice in voting and the market. Journal of Political Economy, 62, 334-343.
15. Buttel, F. H. (1987). New directions in environmental sociology. Annual Review of Sociology, 12, 465-488.
16. Cialdini, R. B., Kaligren, C. A., & Reno, R. R. (1991). A focus theory of normative conduct: A theoretical refinement and reevaluation of the role of norms in human behavior. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 24, 201-234.
17. Cialdini, R. B., Reno, R. R., & Kaligren, C. A. (1990). A focus theory of normative conduct: Recycling the concept of norms to reduce littering in public places. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 1015-1026.
18. Cialdini, R. B., Schaller, M., Houlihan, D., Arps, K., Fultz, J., & Beaman, A. L. (1987). Empathy-based helping: Is it selflessly or selfishly motivated? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 749-758.
19. Code, L. (1991). What can she know? Feminist theory and the construction of knowledge. Ithaca, NY: Comell University Press.
20. Cotgrove, S. (1982). Catastrophe or cornucopia: The environment, politics and the future. New York Wiley.
21. Cummings, R. G., Brookshire, D. S., & Schulze, W. D. (1986). Valuing environmental goods. Totowa, NJ: Rowman and Allanheld.
22. Deaux, K., & Major, B. (1987). Putting gender into context. Psychological Review, 94, 369-389.
23. Devall, B. (1988). Simple in means, rich in ends: Practicing deep ecology. Salt Lake City, UT: Gibbs M. Smith.
24. Devall, B., & Sessions, G. (1985). Deep ecology: Living as if nature mattered. Salt Lake City, UT: Gibbs M. Smith.
25. Diamond, I., & Orenstein, G. F. (1990). Reweaving the world: The emergence of ecofeminism. San Francisco: Sierra Club Books.
26. Dietz, T., & Bums, T. R. (1992). Human agency and the evolutionary dynamics of culture. Uppsala, Sweden: Swedish Collegium for Advanced Study in the Social Sciences.
27. Dietz, T., Bums, T. R., & Buttel, F. H. (1990). Evolutionary theory in sociology: An examination of current thinking. Sociological Forum, 5, 155-171.
28. Dietz, T., Frey, R. S., & Kalof, L. (1987). Estimation with cross-national data: Robust and resampling estimators. American Sociological Review, 52, 380-390.
29. Dietz, T., Kalof, L., & Frey, R. S. (1992). On the utility of robust and resampling estimators. Rural Sociology, 56, 461-474.
30. Dietz, T., & Stem, P. C. (1992, February). Individual preferences and social values. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, Chicago, IL.
31. Dietz, T., Stem, P. C., & Rycroft, R. W. (1989). Definitions of conflict and the legitimaton of resources: The case of environmental risk. Sociological Forum, 4, 47-70.
32. Dillman, D. R. (1978). Mail and telephone surveys: The total design method. New York: Wiley.
33. Dunlap, R. E. (1991). Public opinion in the 1980s: Clear consensus, ambiguous commitment. Environment, 33(October), 10-15, 32-37.
34. Dunlap, R. E., & Van Liere, K. D. (1977a). Land ethic or golden rule: Comment on “land ethic realized” by Thomas A. Heberlein, JSI, 28(4), 1972. Journal of Social Issues, 33, 200-207.
35. Dunlap, R. E., & Van Liere, K. D. (1977b). Response to Heberlein's rejoinder. Journal of Social Issues, 33, 211-212.
36. Dunlap, R. E., & Van Liere, K. D. (1978). The new environmental paradigm: A proposed measuring instrument and preliminary results. Journal of Environmental Education, 9, 10-19.
37. Dunlap, R. E., & Van Liere, K. D. (1984). Commitment to the dominant social paradigm and concern for environmental quality: An empirical examination. Social Science Quarterly, 65, 1013-1028.
38. Eagly, A. H., & Crowley, M. (1986). Genderand helping behavior. Psychological Bulletin, 100, 283-308.
39. Eckersley, R. (1992). Environmentalism and political theory: Toward an ecocentric approach. Albany: State University of New York Press.
40. George, D., & Southwell, P. (1986). Opinion on the Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant. Social Science Quarterly, 67, 722-735.
41. Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women's development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
42. Gregory, R., Lichtenstein, S., & Slovic, P. (1992). Valuing environmental resources: A constructive approach. Unpublished manuscript, Decision Research, Eugene, OR.
43. Griffin, S. (1978). Women and nature: The roaring inside her. New York: Harper & Row.
44. Habermas, J. (1981). New social movements. Telos, 49, 33-37.
45. Hamilton, L. C. (1985). Who cares about water pollution? Opinions in a small-town crisis. Sociological Inquiry, 55, 170-181.
46. Hamilton, W. D. (1964). The genefical evolution of social behavior, 1, 11. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 7, 1-52.
47. Hardin, G. (1968). The tragedy of the commons. Science, 162, 1243-1248.
48. Harris, C. C., Drver, B. L. & McLaughlin, W. J. (1989). Improving the contingent valuation method: A psychological perspective. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 17, 213-229.
49. Heberlein, T. A. (1972). The land ethic realized: Some social psychological explanations for changing environmental attitudes. Journal of Social Issues, 28, 79-87.
50. Heberiein, T. A. (1977). Norm activation and environmental action: A rejoinder to R. E. Dunlap and K. D. Van Liere. Journal of Social Issues, 33, 207-211.
51. Heberlein, T. A. (1981). Environmental attitudes. Zeitschrift for Umweltpolitik, 2, 241-270.
52. Heberlein, T. A. & Black, J. S. (1976). Attitudinal specificity and the prediction of behavior in a field setting. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 33, 474-479.
53. Hines, J. M., Hungerford, H. R., & Tomera, A. N. (1986-1987). Analysis and synthesis of research on responsible environmental behavior. Journal of Environmental Education, 18(2), 1-8.
54. Hopper, J. R., & Nielsen, J. M. (1991). Recycling as altruistic behavior: Normative and behavioral strategies to expand participation in a community recycling program. Environment and Behavior, 23, 195-220.
55. Inglehart, R. (1990). Culture shift in advanced industrial society. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
56. Irwin, J. R., Slovic, P., Uchtenstein, S., & McClelland, G. H. (in press). Preference reversals and the measurement of environmental values. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty.
57. Jasper, J. M., & Nelkin, D. (1991). The animal rights crusade: The growth of a moral protest. New York: Free Press.
58. Jöreskog, K. G. & Sörbom, D. (1988). PRELIS: A program for multivariate data screening and data summarization. Mooresville, IN: Scientific Software, Inc.
59. Leopold, A. (1949). A Sand County almanac. New York: Oxford University Press.
60. McStay, J., & Dunlap, R. E. (1983). Male-female differences in concern for environmental quality. International Journal of Women's Studies, 6, 291-301.
61. Merchant, C. (1979). The death of nature: Women, ecology and the scientific revolution. New York: Harper & Row.
62. Milbrath, L. (1984). Environmentalists: Vanguard for a new society. Albany: State University of New York Press.
63. Mills, R.S.L., Pedersen, J., & Grusec, J. E. (1989). Sex differences in reasoning and emotion about altruism. Sex Roles, 20, 603-621.
64. Mitchell, R. C., & Carson, R. T. (1989). Using surveys to value public goods: The contingent valuation method. Washington DC: Resources for the Future.
65. Mohai, P. (1985). Public concern and elite involvement in environmental-conservation issues. Social Science Quarterly, 66, 820-838.
66. Mohai, P. (1992). Men, women, and the environment: An examination of the gender gap in environmental concern and activism. Society and Natural Resources, 5, 1-19.
67. Naess, A. (1989). Ecology, Community and Lifestyle (D. Rothenberg, Trans). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
68. Offe, C. (1985). New social movements: Challenging the boundaries of institutional politics. Social Research, 52, 817-868.
69. Olson, M. (1965). The logic of collective action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
70. Olsson, U. (1979). Maximum likelihood estimation of the polychoric correlation coefficient. Psychometrika, 44, 443-460.
71. Oskamp, S., Harrington, M. J., Edwards, T. C., Sherwood, D. L., Okuda, S. M., & Swanson, D. C. (1991). Factors influencing household recycling behavior. Environment and Behavior, 23, 494-519.
72. Rokeach, M. (1973). The nature of human values. New York: Free Press.
73. Schahn, J., & Holzer, E. (1990). Studies of individual environmental concern: The role of knowledge, gender and background variables. Environment and Behavior, 22, 767-786.
74. Schaller, M., & Cialdini, R. B. (1988). The economics of empathic helping: Support for a mood management motive. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 24, 163-181.
75. Schwartz, S. H. (1968a). Awareness of consequences and the influence of moral norms on interpersonal behavior. Sociometry, 31, 355-369.
76. Schwartz, S. H. (1968b). Words, deeds, and the perception of consequences and responsibility in action situations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 10, 232-242.
77. Schwartz, S. H. (1970). Moral decision making and behavior. In J. Macauley & L. Berkowitz (Eds.), Altruism and Helping Behavior. New York: Academic Press.
78. Schwartz, S. H. (1977). Normative influences on altruism. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology: Vol. 10 (pp. 221-279). New York: Academic Press.
79. Simon, H. A. (1990). A mechanism for social selection and successful altruism. Science, 250, 1665-1668.
80. Slovic, P. (1992, February). Preference and payment: Psychological issues in valuing environmental impacts. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Association of the Advancement of Science, Chicago, IL.
81. Slovic, P., Griffin, D., & Tversky, A. (1990). Compatibility effects in judgment and choice. In R. M. Hogarth (Ed.), Insights in decision making: A tribute to Hillel J. Einhom (pp. 5-27). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
82. Stern, P. C., Dietz, T., & Black, J. S. (1986). Support for environmental protection: The role of moral norms. Population and Environment, 8, 204-222.
83. Stern, P. C., & Oskamp, S. (1987). Managing scarce environmental resources. In D. Stokols & I. Altman (Eds.), Handbook of Environmental Psychology: Vol. 2 (pp. 1043-1088). New York: Wiley.
84. Trivers, R. (1971). The evolution of reciprocal altruism. Quarterly Review of Biology, 46, 35-57.
85. Tronto, J. (1987). Beyond gender difference to a theory of care. SIGNS: Jourmal of Women in Culture and Society, 12, 644-663.
86. Van Liere, K. D., & Dunlap, R. E. (1978). Moral norms and environmental behavior: An application of Schwartz's norm-activation model to yard burning. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 8, 174-188.
87. Van Liere, K. D., & Dunlap, R. E. (1980). The social bases of environmental concern: A review of hypotheses, explanations and empirical evidence. Public Opinion Quarterly) 44, 181-197.
88. Walsh, E. J. & Wariand, R. W. (1983). Social movement involvement in the wake of a nuclear accident: Activists and free-riders in the Three Mile Island area. American Sociological Review, 48, 764-781.