메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 23, Issue 3, 1993, Pages 6-13

The Family in Medical Decisionmaking

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AUTONOMY; TRUST;

EID: 0027600140     PISSN: 00930334     EISSN: 1552146X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/3563360     Document Type: Article
Times cited : (78)

References (14)
  • 2
    • 84977734857 scopus 로고
    • Hardwig's proposal to “reconstruct medical ethics in light of family interests” (p. 10) is novel in that it rejects the model of patient‐as‐primary‐agent for acute care. Others have argued, along lines similar to Hardwig's, that this is not the appropriate model for home care, where family members share heavily in the burdens of care on an ongoing basis. In the view of Bart Collopy, Nancy Dubler, and Connie Zuckerman, for example, “the ethical problem for home care becomes one of gauging the interplay of agents, the relative weight to be granted to the autonomy and interests of the family vis‐à‐vis those of the elderly recipient of care.” While not disputing the value of the patient‐centered model in acute care, these writers argue that decisionmaking in home care should be “an interactive process, involving negotiation, compromise, and the recognition of reciprocal ties.” See “The Ethics of Home Care: Autonomy and Accommodation,” special [Truncated]
    • (1990) Hastings Center Report , vol.20 , Issue.2 , pp. 1-16
  • 4
    • 0026889809 scopus 로고
    • “Taking Families Seriously,”
    • One author who has advanced something like a communitarian position is James Lindemann Nelson. See his
    • (1992) Hastings Center Report , vol.22 , Issue.4 , pp. 6-12
  • 8
    • 0004123406 scopus 로고
    • In a similar vein Alasdair MacIntyre, taking as his “moral starting point” the “fact that the self has to find its moral identity in and through its membership in communities,” attacks the language of rights for its individualism and the ahistorical and asocial conception of the self it expresses. See, Notre Dame, Ind.:, University of Notre Dame Press, 64, 67, 204, 5
    • (1981) After Virtue , pp. 1-5
  • 9
    • 84936526658 scopus 로고
    • “Should Women Think in Terms of Rights?”
    • at 446
    • (1984) Ethics , vol.94 , Issue.3 , pp. 441-455
    • Hardwig1


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.