Image recovery from data acquired with a charge-coupled-device camera

Journal of the Optical Society of America A: Optics and Image Science, and Vision

Volumn 10, Issue 5, 1993, Pages 1014-1023

  Snyder, Donald L ^a,c   Hammoud, Abed M ^a,c   White, Richard L ^b  

^a WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b STScI   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; IMAGE PROCESSING; INSTRUMENTATION; MATHEMATICS; METHODOLOGY; PHOTOGRAPHY;

ALGORITHMS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MATHEMATICS; PHOTOGRAPHY; SUPPORT, U.S. GOV'T, NON-P.H.S.; SUPPORT, U.S. GOV'T, P.H.S.;

EID: 0027597289     PISSN: 10847529     EISSN: 15208532     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1364/JOSAA.10.001014     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. R. Aikens, D. A. Agard, and J. W Sedat, “Solid-state imagers for microscopy,” Methods Cell Biol. 29, 291-313 (1989).
2. Y. Hiraoka, J. W. Sedat, and D. A. Agard, “The use of charge- coupled devices for quantitative optical microscopy of biological structures,” Science 238, 36-41 (1987).
3. J. C. Sutherland, B. M. Sutherland, A. Emrick, D. C. Montele- one, E. A. Ribeiro, J. Trunk, M. Son, P. Serwer, S. K. Poddar, and J. Maniloff, “Quantitative electronic imaging of gel fluorescence with CCD cameras: Applications to molecular biology,” Biotech. 10, 492-497 (1991).
4. J. A. Tyson, “Progress in low-light-level charge-coupled device imaging in astronomy,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 7, 1231-1236 (1990).
5. R. Griffiths, Hubble Space Telescope: Wide Field and Planetary Camera Instrument Handbook, Version 2.1 (Space Telescope Science Institute, Baltimore, Md., 1990).
6. J. R. Janesick, T. Elliott, S. Collins, M. M. Blouke, and J. Freeman, “Scientific charge-coupled devices,” Opt. Eng. 26, 692-714 (1987).
7. H. Stark, Image Recovery, Theory and Application (Academic, New York, 1987).
8. D. L. Snyder, T. J. Schulz, and J. A. O’Sullivan, “Deblurring subject to nonnegativity constraints,” IEEE Trans. Signal Process. 40, 1143-1150 (1992).
9. W. H. Richardson, “Bayesian-based iterative method of image restoration,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. 62, 55-59 (1972).
10. L. Lucy, ‘An iterative technique for the rectification of observed distributions,” Astron. J. 79, 745-754 (1974).
11. L. A. Shepp and Y. Vardi, “Maximum-likelihood reconstruction for emission tomography,” IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging MI-1, 113-121 (1982).
12. A. D. Dempster, N. M. Laird, and D. B. Rubin, “Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm,” J. R. Stat. Soc. B 39, 1-38 (1977).
13. Y. Vardi, L. A. Shepp, and L. Kaufman, ‘A statistical model for positron emission tomography,” J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 80, 8-35 (1985).
14. C. F. J. Wu, “On the convergence properties of the EM algorithm,” Ann. Stat. 11, 95-103 (1983).
15. H. L. Van Trees, Detection, Estimation, and Modulation Theory: Part 1 (Wiley, New York, 1968).
16. D. L. Snyder and M. I. Miller, Random Point Processes in Time and Space (Springer-Verlag, New York, 1991).
17. D. G. Politte and D. L. Snyder, “Corrections for accidental coincidences and attenuation in maximum-likelihood image reconstruction for positron-emission tomography,” IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 10, 82-89 (1991).
18. W. Feller, An Introduction to Probability Theory and Its Applications (Wiley, New York, 1968).
19. D. Snyder, “Modifications of the Lucy-Richardson iteration for restoring Hubble Space-Telescope imagery,” in The Restoration of HST Images and Spectra, R. L. White and R. J. Allen, eds. (Space Telescope Science Institute, Baltimore, Md., 1990), pp. 56-61.
20. J. Llacer and J. Nunez, “Iterative maximum-likelihood and Bayesian algorithms for image reconstruction in astronomy,” in Restoration of Hubble Space Telescope Images, R. L. White and R. J. Allen, eds. (Space Telescope Science Institute, Baltimore, Md., 1990), pp. 62-69.
21. J. M. Mooney, F. D. Shepherd, W. S. Ewing, J. E. Murguia, and J. Silverman, “Responsivity nonuniformity limited performance of infrared staring cameras,” Opt. Eng. 28, 1151-1161 (1989).
22. A. Tikhonov and V. Arsenin, Solutions of Ill-Posed Problems (Winston, Washington, D.C., 1977).
23. R. Tapia and J. Thompson, Nonparametric Probability Density Estimation (The Johns Hopkins U. Press, Baltimore, Md., 1978).
24. D. L. Snyder and M. I. Miller, “The use of sieves to stabilize images produced with the EM algorithm for emission tomography,” IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. NS-32, 3864-3872 (1985).
25. D. L. Snyder, M. I. Miller, L. J. Thomas Jr., and D. G. Politte, “Noise and edge artifacts in maximum-likelihood reconstructions for emission tomography,” IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging MI-6, 228-238 (1987).
26. D. G. Politte and D. L. Snyder, “The use of constraints to eliminate artifacts in maximum-likelihood image estimation for emission tomography,” IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 35, 608-610 (1988).
27. F. D. Murtagh and H. M. Adorf, “Detecting cosmic ray hits on HST WF/PC images using neural networks and other discriminant analysis approaches,” in Proceedings of the Fourth International Workshop on Data Analysis in Astronomy, V Di Gesu, L. Scarsi, R. Buccheri, P. Crane, M. C. Maccarone, and H. V. Zimmerman, eds. (Plenum, New York, 1992), pp. 103-111.
28. E. J. Groth, ‘An algorithm for removing cosmic rays from two or more cosmic ray split exposures,” in Wide FieldIPlanetary Camera Final Orbital I Science Verification Report, S. M. Faber, ed. (Space Science Telescope Institute, Baltimore, Md., 1992), pp. 14-29.
29. L. Lucy, “Restoration with increased sampling-images and spectra,” in Restoration of Hubble Space Telescope Images, R. L. White and R. J. Allen, eds. (Space Telescope Science Institute, Baltimore, Md., 1990), pp. 80-87.
30. R. L. White and C. J. Burrows, “The HST spherical aberration and its effects on images,” in Restoration of Hubble Space Telescope Images, R. L. White and R. J. Allen, eds. (Space Telescope Science Institute, Baltimore, Md., 1990), pp. 2-6.