A 28s rrna-based phylogeny of the gnathostomes: First steps in the analysis of conflict and congruence with morphologically based cladograms

Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution

Volumn 2, Issue 1, 1993, Pages 31-51

  Vân Le, Hoc Lanh ^a,c   Lecointre, Guillaume ^a,b   Perasso, Roland ^a,b  

^a CNRS   (France)

^b MUSÉUM NATIONAL D'HISTOIRE NATURELLE   (France)

^c UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

RNA 18S; RNA 28S;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; CLASSIFICATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FISH; GENETICS; MOLECULAR GENETICS; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; PHYLOGENY; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; SEQUENCE HOMOLOGY; SPECIES DIFFERENCE; VERTEBRATE;

ANIMAL; BASE SEQUENCE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FISHES; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; PHYLOGENY; RNA, RIBOSOMAL, 18S; RNA, RIBOSOMAL, 28S; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; SEQUENCE HOMOLOGY, NUCLEIC ACID; SPECIES SPECIFICITY; SUPPORT, NON-U.S. GOV'T; VERTEBRATES;

EID: 0027564167     PISSN: 10557903     EISSN: 10959513     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/mpev.1993.1005     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Ajuh, P. M., Heeney, P. A., Maden, B. E., and Edward, H. (1991). Xenopus borealis and Xenopus laevis 28S ribosomal DNA and its complete 40S ribosomal precursor RNA coding units of both species. Proc. R. Soc. London B 245: 65-71.
2. Benton, M. J. (1990). Phylogeny of the major tetrapod groups: Morphological data and divergence dates. J. Mol. Evol. 30: 409-424.
3. Bolt, J. R. (1991). Lissamphibian origins. In “Origins of the Higher Groups of Tetrapods. Controversy and Consensus” (H. P. Schultze and L. Trueb, Eds.), pp. 194-222, Comstock Publishing Associates, Ithaca/London.
4. Carroll, R. L. (1988). “Vertebrate Paleontology and Evolution.” Freeman, New York.
5. Chan, Y. L., Olvera, J., and Wool, I.G. (1983). The structure of rat 28S ribosomal ribonucleic acid inferred from the sequence of nucleotides in a gene. Nucleic Acids Res. 11: 7819-7831.
6. Chang, M. M. (1991). “Rhipidistians,” dipnoans and tetrapods. In “Origins of the Higher Groups of Tetrapods. Controversy and Consensus” (H. P. Schultze and L. Trueb, Eds.), pp. 3-28, Comstock Publishing Associates, Ithaca/London.
7. Daget, J (1950). Affinités phylogénétiques et évolution des polyptér-idés. Mem. Inst. Afr. Noire. 11: 157-169.
8. Daget, J. (1986). Position systématique des polyptéridés et nomenclature. Océanis 12: 183-188.
9. Felsenstein, J. (1978). Cases in which parsimony or compatibility methods will be positively misleading. Syst. Zool. 27: 401-410.
10. Felsenstein, J. (1983). Parsimony in systematics: Biological and statistical issues. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 14: 313-333.
11. Felsenstein, J. (1990). “Phylip 3.3,” Department of Genetics, University of Washington, Seattle.
12. Forey, P. L. (1973). Relationships of elopomorphs. In “Interrelationships of Fishes” (P. H. Greenwood, R. S. Miles, and C. Patterson, Eds.), pp. 351-368. British Museum of Natural History, Academic Press, London.
13. Forey, P. L. (1988). Golden jubilee for the coelacanth Latimeria cha-lumnae. Nature 336: 22-29.
14. François, Y. (1986). Les Téléostéens: Progrès récents en systématique et en Phylogenèse. Océanis 12(5): 323-337.
15. Gaffney, E. S. (1979). Tetrapod monophyly: A phylogenetic analysis. Bull. Carnegie Mus. Nat. Hist. 13: 92-105.
16. Gardine r, B. G., and Schaeffer, B. (1989). Interrelationships of lower actinopterygian fishes. Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 97: 135-187.
17. Gonzalez, I. L., Gorski, J. L., Campen, T. J., Dorney, D. J., Erickson, J. M., Sylvester, J. E., and Schmickel, R. D. (1985). Variation among human 28S ribosomal RNA genes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 82: 7666-7670.
18. Hassouna, N., Michot, B., and Bachellerie, J. P. (1984). The complete nucleotide sequence of mouse 28S rRNA gene. Implications for the process of size increase of the large subunit rRNA in higher eukaryotes. Nucleic Acids Res. 12: 3563-3583.
19. Hedges, S. B., Moberg, K. D., and Maxson, L. R. (1990). Tetrapod phylogeny inferred from 18S and 28S ribosomal RNA sequences and a review of the evidence for amniote relationships. Mol. Biol. Evol. 7(6): 607-633.
20. Hillis, D. M., and Dixon, M. T. (1989). Vertebrate phylogeny: Evidence from 28S ribosomal DNA sequences. In “The Hierarchy of Life. Molecules and Morphology in Phylogenetic Analysis” (B. Fernholm, K. Bremer, and H. Jornvall, Eds.), pp. 355-367, International Congress Series 824. Excerpta Medica, Amsterdam/New York/Oxford.
21. Hillis, D. M., Larson, A., Scott, K. D., and Zimmer, E. A. (1990). Nucleic acids III: Sequencing. In Molecular systematics (D. M. Hillis and C. Moritz, Eds.), pp. 318-370, Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.
22. Hillis, D. M., and Dixon, M. T. (1991). Ribosomal DNA: Molecular evolution and phylogenetic inference. Q. Rev. Biol. 66(4): 411-453.
23. Holmgren, N. (1933). On the origin of the tetrapod limb. Acta Zool. 14: 185-295.
24. Jarvik, E. 1980. “Basic Structure and Evolution of Vertebrates,” Vol. 2, Academic Press, London/New York.
25. Johnson, G. D. 1992. Monophyly of the euteleostean clades- Neoteleostei, Eurypterygii, and Ctenosquamata. Copeia (1): 8-25.
26. Joss, J. M. P., Cramp, N., Baverstock, P. R., and Johnson, A. M. (1991). A phylogenetic comparison of 18S ribosomal RNA sequences of lungfish with those of other chordates. Aust. J. Zool. 39: 509-518.
27. Kimura, M. (1980). A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J. Mol. Evol. 16: 111-120.
28. Lane, D. J., Pace, B., Olsen, G. J., Stahl, D. A., Sogin, M. L., and Pace, N. R. (1985). Rapid determination of 16S ribosomal RNA sequences for phylogenetic analyses. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 82: 6955-6959.
29. Larson, A. (1991). A molecular perspective on the evolutionary relationships of the salamander families. Evol. Biol. 25: 211-277.
30. Larson, A., and Wilson, A. C. (1989). Patterns of ribosomal RNA evolution in salamanders. Mol. Biol. Evol. 6: 131-154.
31. Lauder, G. V., and Liem, K. F. (1983). The evolution and interrelationships of the actinopterygian fishes. Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool. Cambridge (Mass.) 150(3): 95-197.
32. Lê, H. L. V., Perasso, R., and Billard, R. 1989. Phylogénie moléculaire préliminaire des “poissons” basée sur l’analyse de séquences d’ARN ribosomique 28S. C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris 309: 493-498.
33. Maisey, J. G. (1986). Heads and tails: A chordate phylogeny. Cladis-tics 2(3): 201-256.
34. Maniatis, T., Fritsch, E. F., and Sambrook, J. (1982). “Molecular cloning: A Laboratory Manual,” Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, New York.
35. Meyer, A., and Wilson, A. C. (1990). Origin of tetrapods inferred from their mitochondrial DNA affiliation to lungfish. J. Mol. Evol. 31: 359-364.
36. Meyer, A., and Dolven, S. I. (1992). Molecules, fossils, and the origin of tetrapods. J. Mol. Evol. 35: 102-113.
37. Milner, A. R. (1988). The relationships and origin of living amphibians. In “The Phylogeny and Classification of Tetrapods, “Vol. 1, “Amphibians, Reptiles, Birds” (M. J. Benton, Ed.), Systematics Association Special Volume 35A, pp. 59-102, Clarendon Press, Oxford.
38. Nelson, G. (1969). Origin and diversification of teleostean fishes. Ann. New York Acad. Sci. 167: 18-30.
39. Nelson, G. (1989). Phylogeny of major fish groups. In “The Hierarchy of Life. Molecules and Morphology in Phylogenetic Analysis” (B. Fernholm, K. Bremer, and H. Jôrnvall, Eds.), International congress series 824. Excerpta Medica. Amsterdam, New York, Oxford.
40. Normark, B. B., McCune, A. R., and Harrison, R. G. (1991). Phylogenetic relationships of neopterygian fishes, inferred from mitochondrial DNA sequences. Mol. Biol. Evol. 8(6): 819-834.
41. Panchen, A. L., and Smithson, T. R. (1987). Character diagnosis, fossils and the origin of tetrapods. Biol. Rev. 62: 341-438.
42. Patterson, C. (1973). Interrelationships of holosteans. In “Interrelationships of Fishes” (P. H. Greenwood, R. S. Miles, and C. Patterson, Eds.), Academic Press, London.
43. Patterson, C. (1982). Morphology and interrelationships of primitive actinopterygian fishes. Am. Zool. 22: 241-259.
44. Patterson, C., and Rosen, D. E. (1977). Review of ichthyodectiform and other mesozoic teleost fishes and the theory and practice of classifying fossils. Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist. 158(2): 81-172.
45. Philippe, H. (1993). Management utilitarians for sequences and trees. Nucleic Acids Res., in press.
46. Qu, L. H., Michot, B., and Bachellerie, J. P. (1983). Improved methods for structure probing in large RNA’s: A rapid ‘heterologous’ sequencing approach is coupled to the direct mapping of nuclease accessible sites. Application to the 5' terminal domain of eukaryotic 28S rRNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 11(17): 5903-5920.
47. Rage, J. C. (1985). Origine et phylogénie des Amphibiens. Bull. Soc. Herp. Fr. 34: 1-19.
48. Rage, J. C., and Janvier, P. (1982). Le problème de la monophylie des amphibiens actuels, à la lumière des nouvelles données sur les affinités des tétrapodes. In “Phylogénie et Paléobiogéographie” (E. Buffetaut, P. Janvier, J. C. Rage, and P. Tassy, Eds.), Géobios, Mém. Spec. 6: 65-83.
49. Rosen, D. E. (1982). Teleostean interrelationships, morphological function and evolutionary inference. Am. Zool. 22: 261-273.
50. Rosen, D. E., Forey, P. L., Gardiner, B. G., and Patterson, C. (1981). Lungfishes, tetrapods, paleontology, and plesiomorphy. Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist. 167: 163-275.
51. Saitou, N., and Nei, M. 1987. The neighbor-joining Method: A new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol. Biol. Evol. 4(4): 406-425.
52. Sanderson, M. J. (1989). Confidence limits on phylogenies: The bootstrap revisited. Cladistics 5: 113-129.
53. Sàve-Soderbergh, G. (1933). The dermal bones of the head and the lateral line system in Osteolepis macrolepidotus A. G. Nova Acta Reg. Soc. Sci. Uppsala 9: 1-130.
54. Sàve-Sòderbergh, G. (1935). On the dermal bones of the head in labyrinthodont Stegocephalians and primitive Reptilia. Medd. Gronland 98: 1-211.
55. Schultze, H. P. (1986). Dipnoans as sarcopterygians. J. Morphol. Suppl. 1: 39-74.
56. Stiassny, M. L. J., and Moore, J. A. (1992). A review of the pelvic girdle of acanthomorph fishes, with comments on hypotheses of acanthomorph intrarelationships. Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 104: 209-242.
57. Stock, D. W., Moberg, K. D., Maxson, L. R., and Whitt, G. S. (1991a). A phylogenetic analysis of the 18S ribosomal RNA sequence of the coelacanth Latimeria chalumnae. Environ. Biol. Fish. 32: 99-117.
58. Stock, D. W., Gibbons, J. K., and Whitt, G. S. (1991b). Strengths and limitations of molecular sequence comparisons for inferring the phylogeny of the major groups of fishes. J. Fish. Biol. 39 (Suppl A): 225-236.
59. Swofford, D. L. 1986. “PAUP-Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony,” Version 2.4.1. Illinois Nat. Hist. Surv., Champaign, IL.
60. Trueb, L., and Cloutier, R. (1991a). Toward an understanding of the amphibians: Two centuries of systematic history. In “Origins of the Higher Groups of Tetrapods. Controversy and Consensus” (H. P. Schultze and L. Trueb, Eds.), pp. 175-193, Comstock Publishing Associates, Ithaca/London.
61. Trueb, L., and Cloutier, R. (1991b). A phylogenetic investigation of the inter- and intrarelationships of the Lissamphibia (Amphibia: Temnospondyli). In “Origins of the Higher Groups of Tetrapods. Controversy and Consensus” (H. P. Schultze and L. Trueb, Eds.), pp. 223-313. Comstock Publishing Associates, Ithaca/London.
62. Wahlert, G. von. (1968). Latimeria und die Geschichte der Wirbel-thiere. Eine evolutionsbiologische Untersuchung. G. Fischer Ver-lag, Stuttgart.
63. Ware, V. C., Tague, B. W., Clark, C. G., Gourse, R. L., Brand, R. C., and Gerbi, S. A. (1983). Sequence analysis of 28S ribosomal DNA from the amphibian Xenopus. Nucleic Acids Res. 11: 7795-7817.
64. Wintrebert, P. 1910. L’origine des urodèles. Mém. Soc. Biol. Paris 69: 172-174.