A High-Resolution Sensor Based on Tri-aural Perception

IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation

Volumn 9, Issue 1, 1993, Pages 36-48

  Peremans, Herbert ^a   Audenaert, Koenraad ^a   Van Campenhout, Jan M ^a  

^a GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Acoustic sensors; mobile robotics; tri aural perception

Indexed keywords

MOBILE ROBOTS; ULTRASONIC APPLICATIONS; ULTRASONIC TRANSDUCERS;

HIGH-RESOLUTION SENSORS; TIME-OF-FLIGHT SENSORS; TRI-AURAL PERCEPTION; ULTRASONIC SENSORS;

SENSORS;

EID: 0027542175     PISSN: 1042296X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1109/70.210793     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. M. J. Mataric, “Qualitative sonar based environment learning for mobile robots,” in Proc. SPIE Mobile Robots IV (Philadelphia, PA), Nov. 1989, pp. 305–314
2. L. Matthies and A. Elfes, “Integration of sonar and stereo range data using a grid-based representation,” in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Robotics Automat., 1988, pp. 727–733.
3. H. P. Moravec and A. Elfes, “High resolution maps from wide angle sonar,” in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Robotics Automat. (St. Louis, MO), Mar. 1985, pp. 19–24.
4. J. Leonard and H. Durrant-Whyte, “Mobile robot localization by tracking geometric beacons,” IEEE Trans. Robotics Automat., vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 376–382, June 1991.
5. H. Peremans and J. Van Campenhout, “Merging ultrasonic sensor readings into a consistent environment model,” in Proc. SPIE Intelligent Robots and Computer Vision VIII: Systems and Applications (Philadelphia, PA), Nov. 1989, pp. 277-284.
6. M. Beckerman and E. M. Oblow, “Treatment of systematic errors in the processing of wide-angle sonar sensor data for robotic navigation,” IEEE Trans. Robotics Automat., vol. 6, no. 2, 137–145, Apr. 1990.
7. R. Kuc and M. W. Siegel, “Physically based simulation model for acoustic sensor robot navigation,” IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Machine Intell., vol. PAM1-9, no. 6, pp. 766–778, Nov. 1987.
8. Polaroid Corp., Ultrasonic ranging system, (manual and handbook), 1984.
9. N. Suga, “Cortical computational maps for auditory imaging,” Neural Networks, vol. 3, pp. 3–21, 1990.
10. R. A. Altes, “Sonar for generalized target description and its similarity to animal echolocation systems,” J. Acoust. Soc. Amer., vol. 59, no. 1, pp. 97–105, Jan. 1976.
11. K. Audenaert, H. Peremans Y. Kawahara, and J. Van Campenhout, “Accurate ranging of multiple objects using ultrasonic sensors,” in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Robotics Automat. (Nice, France), May 1992, pp. 1733–1738.
12. D. Marr and T. Poggio, “A computational theory of human stereo vision,” Proc. Roy. Soc., Ser. B, vol. 204, pp. 301–328, 1979.
13. H. Peremans, J. Van Campenhout, and L. Levrouw, “Steps towards tri-aural perception,” in Proc. SPIE Advances in Intelligent Robotic Systems: Sensor Fusion IV, Control Paradigms and Data Structures (Boston), Nov. 1991.
14. B. Barshan and R. Kuc, “Differentiating sonar reflections from corners and planes by employing an intelligent sensor,” IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Machine Intell., vol. 12, no. 6, pp. 560–569, June 1990.
15. M. K. Brown, “Feature extraction techniques for recognizing solid objects with an ultrasonic range sensor,” IEEE J. Robotics Automat., vol. RA-1, no. 4, pp. 191–205, Dec. 1985.
16. A. Papoulis, Probability, Random Variables and Stochastic Processes. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1965.
17. R.O. Duda and P.E. Hart, Pattern classification and scene analysis. New York: Wiley, 1973.
18. P. M. Morse and K. U. Ingard, Theoretical Acoustics. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1968.
19. R. S. Berkowitz, Ed., Modern Radar: Analysis, Evaluation and System Design. New York: Wiley, 1965.