Far‐field potentials

Muscle & Nerve

Volumn 16, Issue 3, 1993, Pages 237-254

  Dumitru, Daniel ^a   Jewett, Don L ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT SAN ANTONIO   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

action potentials; far field potentials; statinary potentials; volume conduction

Indexed keywords

ACTION POTENTIAL; CONDUCTOR; ELECTRODE; EVOKED SOMATOSENSORY RESPONSE; HUMAN; LATENT PERIOD; MUSCLE ACTION POTENTIAL; NERVE CONDUCTION; NERVE POTENTIAL; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW;

ACTION POTENTIALS; ANIMAL; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; EVOKED POTENTIALS, SOMATOSENSORY; HUMAN; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; MUSCLES; NEURAL CONDUCTION; PERIPHERAL NERVES; SUPPORT, U.S. GOV'T, P.H.S.;

EID: 0027502109     PISSN: 0148639X     EISSN: 10974598     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/mus.880160302     Document Type: Review

References (66)

1. Somatosensory far‐field potentials: studies in normal subjects and patients with multiple sclerosis
2. The extracellular potential field of the single active nerve fiber in a volume conductor
3. The initial positive potential of the human scalp recorded somatosensory evoked response
4. Short‐latency somatosensory evoked potentials to median and peroneal nerve stimulation: studies in normal subjects and patients with neurologic disease
5. Simulation of ‘stationary’ SAP and SEP phenomena by 2‐dimensional potential field modelling
6. Clinical correlations of serial somatosensory evoked potentials in multiple sclerosis
7. Central somatosensory conduction in man: neural generators and interpeak latencies of the far‐field components recorded from neck and right or left scalp and earlobes
8. Prevertebral (oesophageal) recording of subcortical somatosensory evoked potentials in man: the spinal P13 component and the dual nature of the spinal generators
9. Non‐cephalic reference recording of early somatosensory potentials to finger stimulation in adult or aging normal man: differentiation of widespread N18 and contralateral N20 from the prerolandic P22 and N30 components
10. Unexpected latency shifts on the stationary P9 somatosensory evoked potential far‐field with changes in shoulder position
11. Far‐field potentials due to action potentials traversing curved nerves, reaching cut nerve ends, and crossing boundaries between cylindrical volumes
12. Volume conduction and electromyography
13. Publication criteria for studies of evoked potentials (EP) in man
14. Practical instrumentation and common sources of error
15. Electrophysiologic instrumentation
16. Far‐field potentials in muscle
17. Far‐field potentials in muscle: a quantitative investigation
18. Far‐field potentials in circular volumes
19. Far‐field potentials in circular volumes: the effect of different sizes and intercompartmental openings
20. Far‐field potentials in cylindrical and rectangular volume conductors
21. Far‐field potentials from peripheral nerve: generated at sites of muscle mass change
22. Stationary waves recorded at the shoulder after median nerve stimulation
23. Possible model for generation of P9 far‐field potential
24. Far‐field somatosensory evoked potentials in the cat
25. An averaging response technique for recording potentials relative to a distant point without EKG interference
26. Volume‐conducted potentials in response to auditory stimuli as detected by averaging in the cat
27. Human auditory evoked potentials: possible brain stem components detected on the scalp
28. Auditory‐evoked far‐fields averaged from the scalp of humans
29. Auditory evoked potentials: overview of the field (and shoreline)—1986
30. Far‐field potentials recorded from action potentials and from a tripole in a hemicylindrical volume
31. Far‐field potentials generated by action potentials of isolated frog sciatic nerves in a spherical volume
32. The leading/trailing dipole model as a means of understanding generators of far‐field potentials
33. Stationary potentials after median nerve stimulation: changes with arm position
34. Short‐latency somatosensory evoked potentials following median nerve stimulation
35. Neural pathways of somatosensory evoked potentials: clinical implications
36. Field distribution of antidromically activated digital nerve potentials: model for far‐field recording
37. Stationary peaks from a moving source in far‐field recording
38. What determines the latency and amplitude of stationary peaks in far‐field recordings?
39. Far‐field recording of the junctional potential generated by median nerve volleys at the wrist
40. Model for far‐field recordings of SEP
41. Analysis of the distribution of the action currents of nerve in volume conductors
42. Origin of far‐field subcortical potentials evoked by stimulation of the posterior tibial nerve
43. Origin of far‐field subcortical evoked potentials to posterior tibial and median nerve stimulation. A comparative study
44. Critical analysis of the methods used to identify generator sources of evoked potential (EP) peaks
45. The initial positive component of the scalp‐recorded somatosensory evoked potential in normal subjects and in patients with neurological disorders
46. Action potentials recorded by fluid electrodes
47. Origin of action potential recorded by fluid electrodes
48. Application of Hodgkin–Huxley equations to excitable tissue
49. Evoked responses‐a neurophysiological indicator of depth of anesthesia?
50. Evoked potentials during isoflurane anaesthesia
51. Effects of halothane and enflurane on far and near field somatosensory evoked potentials
52. A volume conductor study of compound action potentials of nerves in situ: the forward problem
53. Modelling compound action potentials of peripheral nerves in situ I: Model description: evidence for non‐linear relation between fibre diameter and velocity
54. Far‐field evoked potential components induced by a propagating generator: computational evidence
55. Stimulating and recording methods used in obtaining short‐latency somtosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) in patients with central and peripheral neurologic disorders
56. Potentials in a volume conductor
57. Short latency somatosensory evoked potentials following median nerve stimulation in man
58. Far‐field somatosensory evoked potentials after stimulation of the tibial nerve
59. Stationary negative potentials near the source vs positive far‐field potentials at a distance
60. Presence of two subcomponents in P9 far‐field potentials following stimulation of the median nerve