Advances in Diagnostic Imaging and Overestimations of Disease Prevalence and the Benefits of Therapy

New England Journal of Medicine

Volumn 328, Issue 17, 1993, Pages 1237-1243

  Black, William C ^a,b   Welch, H Gilbert ^a,c  

^a DARTMOUTH MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^b DARTMOUTH HITCHCOCK MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^c VA MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ABDOMINAL AORTA ANEURYSM; ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; DIAGNOSIS; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DISEASE COURSE; HUMAN; PREVALENCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; THERAPY;

AGED; AORTIC ANEURYSM, ABDOMINAL; BIAS (EPIDEMIOLOGY); BREAST NEOPLASMS; DECISION MAKING; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGE; NEOPLASMS; PREVALENCE; SUPPORT, U.S. GOV'T, NON-P.H.S.; THYROID NEOPLASMS;

EID: 0027468277     PISSN: 00284793     EISSN: 15334406     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1056/NEJM199304293281706     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Feldman AR, Kessler L, Myers MH, Naughton MD The prevalence of cancer: estimates based on the Connecticut Tumor Registry. N Engl J Med 1986; 315:1394-1397
2. Montie JE, Wood DP Jr, Pontes E, Boyett JM, Levin HS Adenocarcinoma of the prostate in cytoprostatectomy specimens removed for bladder cancer. Cancer 1989; 63:381-385
3. Cooner WH, Mosley BR, Rutherford CL Jr, Prostate cancer detection in a clinical urological practice by ultrasonography, digital rectal examination and prostate specific antigen. J Urol 1990; 143:1146-1154
4. Lee F, Littrup PJ, Torp-Pedersen ST, Prostate cancer: comparison of transrectal US and digital rectal examination for screening. Radiology 1988; 168:389-394
5. Feinstein AR, Sosin DM, Wells CK The Will Rogers phenomenon: stage migration and new diagnostic techniques as a source of misleading statistics for survival in cancer. N Engl J Med 1985; 312:1604-1608
6. Feinleib M, Zelen M Some pitfalls in the evaluation of screening programs. Arch Environ Health 1969; 19:412-415
7. Cole P, Morrison AS Basic issues in population screening for cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 1980; 64:1263-1272
8. Islands, clusters, and percolation; diameter-number relations. In: Mandelbrot BB. The fractal geometry of nature. Rev. ed. New York: W.H. Freeman, 1983:116.
9. Lederle FA, Walker JM, Reinke DB Selective screening for abdominal aortic aneurysms with physical examination and ultrasound. Arch Intern Med 1988; 148:1753-1756
10. Melton LJ III, Bickerstaff LK, Hollier LH, Changing incidence of abdominal aortic aneurysms: a population-based study. Am J Epidemiol 1984; 120:379-386
11. Harach HR, Franssila KO, Wasenius VM Occult papillary carcinoma of the thyroid: a “normal” finding in Finland: a systematic autopsy study. Cancer 1985; 56:531-538
12. Cancer. In: Dorland's illustrated medical dictionary. 27th ed. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders, 1988:261.
13. Hicks MJ, Davis JR, Layton JM, Present AJ Sensitivity of mammography and physical examination of the breast for detecting breast cancer. JAMA 1979; 242:2080-2083
14. Sickles EA, Ominsky SH, Sollitto RA, Galvin HB, Monticciolo DL Medical audit of a rapid-throughput mammography screening practice: methodology and results of 27,114 examinations. Radiology 1990; 175:323-327
15. Kopans DB The positive predictive value of mammography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1992; 158:521-526
16. Nielsen M, Thomsen JL, Primdahl S, Dyreborg U, Andersen JA Breast cancer and atypia among young and middle-aged women: a study of 110 medicolegal autopsies. Br J Cancer 1987; 56:814-819
17. Shapiro S Evidence on screening for breast cancer from a randomized trial. Cancer 1977; 39: Suppl: 2772-2782
18. Stacey-Clear A, McCarthy KA, Hall DA, Breast cancer survival among women under age 50: is mammography detrimental? Lancet 1992; 340:991-994
19. Meyer JE, Eberlein TJ, Stomper PC, Sonnenfeld MR Biopsy of occult breast lesions: analysis of 1261 abnormalities. JAMA 1990; 263:2341-2343
20. White E, Lee CY, Kristal AR Evaluation of the increase in breast cancer incidence in relation to mammography use. J Natl Cancer Inst 1990; 82:1524-1528
21. Bottinger LE, Hallberg D, Schreeb TV Renal carcinoma as an accidental finding. Acta Chir Scand 1964; 127:158-161
22. Grinnell RS, Lane N Benign and malignant adenomatous polyps and papillary adenomas of the colon and rectum: an analysis of 1,856 tumors in 1,335 patients. Int Abstr Surg 1958; 106:519-538
23. Hellsten S, Berge T, Wehlin L Unrecognized renal cell carcinoma: clinical and diagnostic aspects. Scand J Urol Nephrol 1981; 15:269-272
24. Reinig JW, Dwyer AJ, Miller DL, Liver metastasis detection: comparative sensitivities of MR imaging and CT scanning. Radiology 1987; 162:43-47
25. Healy ME, Hesselink JR, Press GA, Middleton MS Increased detection of intracranial metastases with intravenous Gd-DTPA. Radiology 1987; 165:619-624
26. Xipell JM The incidence of benign renal nodules (a clinicopathologic study). J Urol 1971; 106:503-506
27. Black WC, Ling A Is earlier diagnosis really better? The misleading effects of lead time and length biases. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1990; 155:625-630
28. Morrison AS. Screening in chronic disease. Vol. 7 of Monographs in epidemiology and biostatistics. New York: Oxford University Press, 1985:22-3.
29. Miller AB. Screening and detection. In: Bland KI, Copeland EM, eds. The breast. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders, 1991:419.
30. Graunt J. Foundations of vital statistics. In: Newman JR, ed. The world of mathematics. Vol. 3. Redmond, Wash.: Tempus Books, 1988:1399-413.
31. Seidman H, Mushinski MH, Gelb SK, Silverberg E Probabilities of eventually developing or dying of cancer – United States, 1985. CA Cancer J Clin 1985; 35:36-56
32. National Center for Health Statistics. Vital statistics of the United States, 1986. Vol. 2. Mortality. Part B. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office, 1986. (DHHS publication no. (PHS) 88-1114.)
33. Andersson I, Aspegren K, Janzon L, Mammographic screening and mortality from breast cancer: the Malmo mammographic screening trial. BMJ 1988; 297:943-948
34. Kubik A, Parkin DM, Khlat M, Erban J, Polak J, Adamec M Lack of benefit from semi-annual screening for cancer of the lung: follow-up report of a randomized controlled trial on a population of high-risk males in Czechoslovakia. Int J Cancer 1990; 45:26-33
35. Sacks H, Chalmers TC, Smith H Jr Randomized versus historical controls for clinical trials. Am J Med 1982; 72:233-240
36. Smith SJ, Bosniak MA, Megibow AJ, Hulnick DH, Horii SC, Raghavendra BN Renal cell carcinoma: earlier discovery and increased detection. Radiology 1989; 170:699-703
37. Mold JW, Stein HF The cascade effect in the clinical care of patients. N Engl J Med 1986; 314:512-514
38. Frost JK, Ball WC Jr, Levin ML, Early lung cancer detection: results of the initial (prevalence) radiologic and cytologic screening in the Johns Hopkins study. Am Rev Respir Dis 1984; 130:549-554
39. Flehinger BJ, Melamed MR, Zaman MB, Heelan RT, Perchick WB, Martini N Early lung cancer detection: results of the initial (prevalence) radiologic and cytologic screening in the Memorial Sloan-Kettering study. Am Rev Respir Dis 1984; 130:555-560
40. Fontana RS, Sanderson DR, Taylor WF, Early lung cancer detection: results of the initial (prevalence) radiologic and cytologic screening in the Mayo Clinic study. Am Rev Respir Dis 1984; 130:561-565
41. Kubik A, Polak J Lung cancer detection: results of a randomized prospective study in Czechoslovakia. Cancer 1986; 57:2427-2437
42. Sanderson DR Lung cancer screening: the Mayo study. Chest 1986; 89: Suppl: 324S-324S
43. Tockman MS Survival and mortality from lung cancer in a screened population: the Johns Hopkins study. Chest 1986; 89: Suppl: 324S-325S
44. Martini N Results of the Memorial Sloan-Kettering study in screening for early lung cancer. Chest 1986; 89: Suppl: 325S-325S
45. Linver MN, Paster SB, Rosenberg RD, Key CR, Stidley CA, King WV Improvement in mammography interpretation skills in a community radiology practice after dedicated teaching courses: 2-year medical audit of 38,633 cases. Radiology 1992; 184:39-43 [Erratum, Radiology 1992;184:878.]
46. Hopper KD, Landis JR, Meilstrup JW, McCauslin MA, Sechtin AG The prevalence of asymptomatic gallstones in the general population. Invest Radiol 1991; 26:939-945
47. Boden SD, Davis DO, Dina TS, Patronas NJ, Wiesel SW Abnormal magnetic-resonance scans of the lumbar spine in asymptomatic subjects. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1990; 72:403-408
48. Kornick J, Trefelner E, McCarthy S, Lange R, Lynch K, Jokl P Meniscal abnormalities in the asymptomatic population at MR imaging. Radiology 1990; 177:463-465
49. Vaccaro JP, Cronan JJ, Dorfman GS Outcome analysis of patients with normal compression US examinations. Radiology 1990; 175:645-649
50. Huisman MV, Buller HR, ten Cate JW, Unexpected high prevalence of silent pulmonary embolism in patients with deep venous thrombosis. Chest 1989; 95:498-502
51. Bailar JC III, Smith EM Progress against cancer? N Engl J Med 1986; 314:1226-1232
52. Scott RAP, Ashton HA, Kay DN Abdominal aortic aneurysm in 4237 screened patients: prevalence, development and management over 6 years. Br J Surg 1991; 78:1122-1125
53. Sickles EA Periodic mammographic follow-up of probably benign lesions: results in 3,184 consecutive cases. Radiology 1991; 179:463-468
54. Bosniak MA The small ( ≤ 3.0 cm) renal parenchymal tumor: detection, diagnosis, and controversies. Radiology 1991; 179:307-317 [Erratum, Radiology 1991;181:289.]
55. Diagnostic and spectral markers. In: Feinstein AR. Clinical epidemiology: the architecture of clinical research. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders, 1985:597-631.
56. Black WC, Dwyer AJ Local versus global measures of accuracy: an important distinction for diagnostic imaging. Med Decis Making 1990; 10:226-273