New processing strategies for multichannel cochlear prostheses

Progress in Brain Research

Volumn 97, Issue C, 1993, Pages 313-321

  Lawson, D T ^a   Wilson, B S ^a   Finley, C C ^a  

^a RTI INTERNATIONAL   (United States)

Author keywords

Cochlear prosthesis; Deafness; Hearing; Speech perception; Speech processing

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL ARTICLE; COCHLEA PROSTHESIS; CONFERENCE PAPER; HEARING LOSS; HUMAN; SPEECH PERCEPTION;

EID: 0027430650     PISSN: 00796123     EISSN: 18757855     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1016/S0079-6123(08)62291-8     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Dorman, M.F., Soli, S., Dankowski, K., Smith, L.M., McCandless, G., Parkin, J., Acoustic cues for consonant identification by patients who use the Ineraid cochlear implant. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 88 (1990), 2074–2079.
2. Eddington, D.K., Speech discrimination in deaf subjects with cochlear implants. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 68 (1980), 885–891.
3. Gantz, B.J., McCabe, B.F., Tyler, R.S., Preece, J.P., Evaluation of four cochlear implant designs. Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol. 96:Suppl. 128 (1987), 145–147.
4. Hall, J.W., Haggard, M.P., Fernandes, M.A., Detection in noise by spectro-temporal pattern analysis. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 76 (1984), 50–56.
5. Miller, G.A., Nicely, P.E., An analysis of perceptual confusions among some English consonants. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 27 (1955), 338–352.
6. B.C. J. Moore (1991) Comodulation masking release and acrosschannel masking. In: Workshop on the Psychophysics of Speech Perception, II, Utrecht, Netherlands, July 1–5 in press.
7. Owens, E., Kessler, D.K., Raggio, M., Schubert, E.D., Analysis and revision of the Minimal Auditory Capabilities (MAC) battery. Ear Hear. 6 (1985), 280–287.
8. Rabiner, L.R., Shafer, R.W., Digital Processing of Speech Signals, 1978, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
9. Rosen, S., Temporal information in speech and its relevance for cochlear implants. Fraysse, B., Cochard, N., (eds.) Cochlear Implant: Acquisitions and Controversies, 1989, Impasse La Caussade, Toulouse, 3–26.
10. Shannon, R.V., Multichannel electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve in man. I. Basic psychophysics. Hear. Res. 11 (1983), 157–189.
11. Tye-Murray, N., Tyler, R.S., Auditory consonant and word recognition skills of cochlear implant users. Ear Hear. 10 (1989), 292–298.
12. Tyler, R.S., Preece, J.P., Lowder, M.W., The Iowa audiovisual speech perception laser videodisc, 1987, Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University of Iowa Hospital and Clinics, Iowa City, IA Laser Videodisc and Laboratory Report.
13. Van Tasell, D.J., Soli, S.D., Kirby, V.M., Widen, G.P., Speech waveform envelope cues for consonant recognition. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 82 (1987), 1152–1161.
14. White, M.W., Merzenich, M.M., Gardi, J.N., Multichannel cochlear implants: channel interactions and processor design. Arch. Otolaryngol. 110 (1984), 493–501.
15. B.S. Wilson, D.T. Lawson, C.C. Finley (1990) Speech processors for auditory prostheses. Fourth Quarterly Progress Report, NIH project N01-DC-9–2401.
16. Wilson, B.S., Finley, C.C., Lawson, D.T., Wolford, R.D., Eddington, D.K., Rabinowitz, W.M., Better speech recognition with cochlear implants. Nature 352 (1991), 236–238.
17. Wilson, B.S., Lawson, D.T., Finley, C.C., Wolford, R.D., Coding strategies for multichannel cochlear prostheses. Am. J. Otol. 12:Suppl. 1 (1991), 56–61.