Impact of a breast cancer screening community intervention

Preventive Medicine

Volumn 22, Issue 1, 1993, Pages 34-53

  Zapka, Jane G ^a   Costanza, Mary E ^b   Harris, Donald R ^a   Hosmer, David ^a   Stoddard, Anne ^a   Barth, Robin ^c   Gaw, Victoria ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^c NONE

^d Martha Eliot Health Center   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0027392963     PISSN: 00917435     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/pmed.1993.1003     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Greenwald P, Sondik EJ. Cancer Control Objectives for the Nation: 1985-2000. Bethesda, MD: NCI Monographs, No. 2, 1986, National Cancer Institute 1989; NIH publication no. 86-2880.
2. NCI Breast Cancer Screening Consortium. Screening mammography: A missed clinical opportu nity? JAMA 1990; 264:54-58.
3. Costanza ME, Zapka JG, Hosmer D, Harris DR, Gaw V, Barth R, Stoddard A. Impact of a physician intervention program to increase breast cancer screening. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev, in press.
4. Costanza ME, Greene HL, Zapka JG, Barth RS, D’Orsi CJ, Wethiemer MD. Breast cancer screening for primary care physicians. In: Anderson PN, et al., Eds. Progress in Cancer Control. New York: A. R. Liss, 1988; 65-74.
5. Gaw VP, Bush SM, D’Orsi CJ, Costanza ME, Karellas A, Dowd M, Zapka JG. A program to improve mammography skills in practicing radiologic technologists. Qual Rev Bull 1991; 17(2): 48-15.
6. AMC Cancer Research Center. Breast and Cervical Screening: Barriers on Use Among Specific Populations, A Review of Literature Prepared for Public Health Planners. Denver, CO: AMC, 1992.
7. Costanza ME, Stoddard AM, Zapka JG, Gaw VP, Barth R. Physician compliance with mammog raphy guidelines: Barriers and enhancers. J Am Board Fam Pract 1992; 5(2): 1-10.
8. Rimer BK, Track B, Engstrom PF. Why do some women get regular mammograms? Am J Prev Med 1991; 7(2): 69-74.
9. Fulton JP, Buechner JS, Scott HD, DeBuono BA, Feldman JP, Smith RA, Kovenock D. A study guided by the health belief model of the predictors of breast cancer screening of women ages 40 and older. Public Health Rep 1991; 106(4):410-420.
10. Fox SA, Murata PJ, Stein JA. The impact of physician compliance on screening mammography for older women. Arch Intern Med 1991; 151:50-56.
11. Lane D, Burg MA. Breast cancer screening: Changing physician practices and specialty variation. NY State J Med 1990; 90:288-292.
12. Harris RP, Fletcher SW, Gonzalez JJ, Lannin DR, Degnan D, Earp JA, Clark R. Mammography and age: Are we targeting the wrong women? Cancer 1990; 67:2010-2014.
13. Costanza ME, Zapka JG, Stoddard A, Gaw V, Barth R, Greene H, et al. Interim Results of a Community Intervention to Promote Breast Cancer Screening. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Public Health Association, New York, 1990.
14. Zapka JG, Stoddard AM, Barth R, Costanza ME, Mas E. Breast cancer screening utilization by Latina community health center clients. Health Educ Res 1989; 4:461-468.
15. Zapka JG, Chasan L, Barth R, Mas E, Costanza ME. Integration of breast cancer screening into a community health center. J Amb Care Management 1992; 15(1):38—47.
16. Green LW, Kreuter M. Health Promotion Planning: An Educational and Environmental Ap proach. Mountain View, CA: Mayfield, 1991.
17. Zapka JG, Stoddard AM, Costanza ME, Greene HL. Breast cancer screening by mammography: Utilization and associated factors. Am J Public Health 1989; 79:1499-1502.
18. Gravell JA, Zapka JG, Mamon JA. Impact of breast self-examination messages on social network communications: An exploratory study. Health Educ Q 1985; 12(1):51—64.
19. Zapka JG, Harris DR, Stoddard AM, Costanza ME. Validity and reliability of psychosocial factors related to breast cancer screening. Evaluation Health Prof 1991; 14(3):356—367.
20. Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S. Applied Logistic Regression. New York: Wiley, 1989.
21. Lane DS, Polednak AP, Burg MA. Effect of continuing medical education and cost reduction on physician compliance with mammography screening guidelines. J Fam Pract 1991; 33(4):359-368.
22. Centers for Disease Control. Mammography—United States, 1990. MMWR 1990; 39:621-630.
23. Gonzalez J, Harris R. 1991. Increasing mammography utilization among older women: A controlled study. Personal Communication.
24. Thompson GB, Kessler LG, Boss LP. Breast cancer screening legislation in the United States: A commentary. Am J Public Health 1989; 79:1541-1543.
25. Stoddard AM, Zapka JG, Schoenfeld S, Costanza ME. Effect of a news event on breast cancer screening survey response. In Engstrom PF, et al., Eds. Advances in Cancer Control. New York: Wiley-Liss, 1990; 259-268.
26. Lerman C, Rimer B, Trock B, Balshem B, Engstrom PF. Factors associated with repeat adherence to breast cancer screening. Prev Med 1990; 19:279-291.
27. Commonwealth of Massachusetts. Continuing Medical Education Requirements for Physician Licenses, 1990-1991. Massachusetts Board of Registration in Medicine, Boston, MA.
28. Spratt JS, Spratt SW. Medical and legal implications of screening and follow-up procedures for breast cancer. Cancer 1990; 66(Supplement):1351-1362.
29. Zapka JG, Berkowitz E. A qualitative study about breast cancer screening in older women: Implications for research. J Gerontol, in press.
30. Costanza ME, Stoddard A, Gaw VP, Zapka JG. The Risk Factor of Age and Family History and their Relationship to Screening Mammography Use. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Public Health Association, Atlanta, GA, 1991.
31. Windsor RA, Baranowski T, Clark N, Cutter G. Evaluation of Health Promotion and Education Programs. Palo Alto, CA: Mayfield, 1984.
32. Cook TD, Campbell DT. Quasi-Experimentation, Design and Analysis Issues for Field Settings. Chicago: Rand McNally College Publishing, 1979.
33. King ES, Rimer BK, Trock B, Balshem A, Engstrom P. How valid are mammography self-reports? Am J Public Health 1990; 80(11): 1386-1388.
34. Degnan D, Harris R, Ranney J, Quade D, Earp JA, Gonzalez J. 1991. Measuring the use of mammography: Two methods compared. Am J Public Health 1992; 82(10):1386-1388.