Frequency and Determinants of Screening for Breast Cancer in Primary Care Group Practice

Archives of Internal Medicine

Volumn 153, Issue 18, 1993, Pages 2113-2117

  Love, Richard R ^a,b   Brown, Roger L ^b   Davis, James E ^b   Baumann, Linda J ^b   Fontana, Susan A ^a   Sanner, Louis A ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; CANCER SCREENING; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HEALTH INSURANCE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MAMMOGRAPHY; PRIMARY MEDICAL CARE; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

BREAST NEOPLASMS; FAMILY PRACTICE; FEMALE; GROUP PRACTICE; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; HUMAN; MAMMOGRAPHY; MASS SCREENING; MEDICAL AUDIT; MIDDLE AGE; MIDWESTERN UNITED STATES; QUESTIONNAIRES; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SOCIOECONOMIC FACTORS; SUPPORT, NON-U.S. GOV'T; SUPPORT, U.S. GOV'T, P.H.S.;

EID: 0027379249     PISSN: 00039926     EISSN: 15383679     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1001/archinte.1993.00410180059006     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Report of the US Preventive Services Task Force. Guide to Clinical Preventive Service. Baltimore, Md: Williams & Wilkins; 1989.
2. Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination. The periodic health examination. Can Med Assoc J. 1989;141:205-207.
3. American Cancer Society. Summary of Current Guidelines for the Cancer-Related Checkup: Recommendations. New York, NY: American Cancer Society; 1988.
4. Council of Scientific Affairs. Mammographic screening in asymptomatic women aged 40 years and over. JAMA. 1989;261:2535-2542.
5. NCI Breast Cancer Screening Consortium. Screening mammography: a missed clinical opportunity. JAMA. 1990;264:54-58.
6. Hayward R, Shapiro M, Freeman H, Carey C. Who gets screening for cervical and breast cancer? Arch Intern Med. 1988;188:1177-1181.
7. McPhee S, Richard R, Solkowitz S. Performance of cancer screening in a university general internal medicine practice: comparison with the 1980 American Cancer Society Guidelines. J Gen Intern Med. 1986;1:275-281.
8. McPhee S, Bird J, Fordham D, Rodnick J, Osborn E. Promoting cancer prevention activities by primary care physicians. JAMA. 1991;266:538-544.
9. Lurie N, Manning W, Peterson C, Goldberg G, Phelps C, Lillard L. Preventive care: do we practice what we preach? Am J Public Health. 1989;77:801-804.
10. Zapka J, Stoddard A, Costanza M, Greene H. Breast cancer screening by mammography: utilization and associated factors. Am J Public Health. 1989;79:1499-1502.
11. Bourguet C, Gilchrist V, Kandula M. Correlates of screening mammography in a family practice setting. J Fam Pract. 1988;27:49-54.
12. Fox S, Klos D, Tsou C. Underuse of screening mammography by family physicians. Radiology. 1988;166:431-433.
13. Romm F, Fletcher S, Hulka B. The periodic health examination: comparison of recommendations and internists’ performance. South Med J. 1981;74:265-271.
14. American Cancer Society. 1989 Survey of physicians’ attitudes and practices in early cancer detection. CA Cancer J Clin. 1990;40:77-101.
15. Bergner M, Allison C, Dieter P. Early detection and control of cancer in clinical practice. Arch Intern Med. 1990;150:431-436.
16. Rimer B, Keintz M, Kessler H, Engstrom P, Rosan J. Why women resist mammograms. Radiology. 1989;172:243-246.
17. Baines C. Impediments to recruitment in the Canadian National Breast Screening Study: response and resolution. Controlled Clin Trials. 1984;5:129-140.
18. Vogel V, Peters G, Fueger J, Winn R. Analyses of barriers and incentives to mammographic screening in the American Cancer Society 1987 Texas Breast Cancer Screening Project. Prev Med. 1988;17:240-244.
19. Mayer J, Slymen D, Jones J, Allen J. Mammography knowledge and intentions among insured women. Prev Med. 1992;21:8-17.
20. Vernon S, Laville E, Jackson G. Participation in breast screeening programs: a review. Soc Sci Med. 1990;30:1107-1118.
21. Bloom J, Grazier K, Hodge F, Hayes W. Factors affecting the use of screening mammography among African American women. Cancer Epidimiol Biomarkers Prev. 1991;1:75-82.
22. Fox S, Muralta P, Stein J. The impact of physician compliance on screening mammography for older women. Arch Intern Med. 1991;151:50-56.
23. Lantz P, Remington P, Saref M. Self-reported barriers to mammography: implications for physicians. Wis Med J. 1990;89:602-606.
24. Green L, Eriksen M, Schor E. Preventive practices by physicians: behavioral determinants and potential interventions. Am J Prev Med. 1988;4(suppl):101-107.
25. Cohen J. A coefficient of agreement for nomial scales. Educ Psychol Meas. 1960;20:37-46.
26. Moorman JE. Aggregation bias: an empirical demonstration. In: Borgatta EF, Jackson DJ, eds. Aggregate Data: Analysis and Interpretation. Beverly Hills, Calif: Sage; 1980.
27. De Leeuw J, Kreft I. Random coefficient models for multilevel analysis. J Educ Stat. 1986;11:57-85.
28. Bryk AS, Raudenbush SW. Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods. Newbury Park, Calif: Sage; 1992.
29. Brown R. The use of multilevel hierarchical linear modeling in primary care research. In: Fifth Annual Primary Care Research Methods and Statistics Conference. San Antonio: University of Texas Health Center; 1990.
30. Prosser R, Rasbash J, Goldstein H. ML3: Software for Three-Level Analysis. London, England: University of London, Institute of Education; 1990.
31. Cresswell M. A multilevel bivariate model. In: Prosser R, Rasbash J, Goldstein H, eds. Data Analysis With ML3. London, England: University of London, Institute of Education; 1991.
32. Little RJA, Rubin DB. Statistical Analysis With Missing Data. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons Inc; 1987.
33. Love R, Davis J. Screening mammography in clinical practice: a complex activity. Arch Intern Med. 1991;151:19-21.