Conflict of Interest: The New McCarthyism in Science

JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association

Volumn 269, Issue 21, 1993, Pages 2782-2784

  Rothman, Kenneth J ^a  

^a BOSTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONFLICT; ETHICS; MEDICAL INFORMATION; NOTE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLICATION; SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE;

BIOMEDICAL AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; CLINICAL APPROACH/SOURCE; DUE PROCESS; EDITORIAL POLICIES; JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION; MANDATORY PROGRAMS; NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE; UNITED STATES; VOLUNTARY PROGRAMS;

CONFLICT OF INTEREST; DISCLOSURE; ORGANIZATIONAL POLICY; PERIODICALS; PUBLISHING;

EID: 0027273425     PISSN: 00987484     EISSN: 15383598     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1001/jama.1993.03500210082037     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Rennie D, Flanagin A, Glass RM. Conflict of interest in the publication of science. JAMA. 1991;266:266-267.
2. Relman AS. Dealing with conflicts of interest. N Engl J Med. 1984;316:1182-1183.
3. Marshall E. When does intellectual passion become conflict of interest? Science. 1992;257:620-621.
4. Koshland DE Jr. Conflict of interest policy. Science. 1992;257:595.
5. Marshall E. Sex on the brain. Science. 1992;257:620-621.
6. Marshall E. The perils of a deeply held point of view. Science. 1992;257:621-622.
7. Popper KR. The High Tide of Prophecy: Hegel, Marx, and the Aftermath. In: The Open Society and Its Enemies, vol 2. 5th ed. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 1966.
8. Relman AS. New ‘information for authors’—and readers. N Engl J Med. 1990;323:56.
9. Waltuch AL. New editorial policy on conflicts of interest. N Engl J Med. 1990;323:1568-1569.
10. Rothman KJ. The ethics of research sponsorship. J Clin Epidemiol. 1991;44 (suppl):23S-28S.
11. NcNutt RA, Evans AT, Fletcher RH, Fletcher SW. The effects of blinding on the quality of peer review: a randomized trial. JAMA. 1990;263:1371-1376.