Does feedback improve the quality of cervical smears? A randomized controlled trial

British Journal of General Practice

Volumn 43, Issue 370, 1993, Pages 194-198

  Buntinx, F ^a   Knottnerus, J A ^a   Crebolder, H F J M ^a   Seegers, T ^a   Essed, G G M ^a   Schouten, H ^a  

^a Dr Haubenlaan 43 ^*  (Belgium)

Author keywords

Cervical samplers; Cervical screening; Diagnostic techniques; Feedback; Screening accuracy

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA ANALYSIS; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC PROCEDURE; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; UTERINE CERVIX CYTOLOGY;

ADULT; BELGIUM; CERVIX NEOPLASMS; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; DOUBLE-BLIND METHOD; FAMILY PRACTICE; FEEDBACK; FEMALE; GYNECOLOGY; HUMAN; MALE; MASS SCREENING; QUALITY OF HEALTH CARE; SUPPORT, NON-U.S. GOV'T; VAGINAL SMEARS;

EID: 0027243707     PISSN: 09601643     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (0)