Factors affecting general practitioners' recruitment of patients into a prospective study

Family Practice

Volumn 10, Issue 2, 1993, Pages 207-211

  Coulter, Angela ^a   Peto, Viv ^a   Bond, Alison ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONSULTATION; EXPERIENCE; FEMALE; GENERAL PRACTITIONER; HUMAN; MALE; MEDICAL RESEARCH; MENORRHAGIA; PERSONNEL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; QUESTIONNAIRE; STRESS; SYMPTOM;

ADULT; BIAS (EPIDEMIOLOGY); CLINICAL TRIALS; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; ENGLAND; FAMILY PRACTICE; FEMALE; HUMAN; INCIDENCE; MENORRHAGIA; MIDDLE AGE; PATIENT ACCEPTANCE OF HEALTH CARE; PATIENT EDUCATION; PHYSICIAN-PATIENT RELATIONS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; REFERRAL AND CONSULTATION; SUPPORT, NON-U.S. GOV'T;

EID: 0027169595     PISSN: 02632136     EISSN: 14602229     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/fampra/10.2.207     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Coulter A, Bradlow J, Agass M, Martin-Bates C, Tulloch A. Outcomes of referrals for menstrual problems: an audit of general practice records. Br J Obstet Gynaecol1991; 98: 789-796.
2. Wilkin D, Hallam L, Doggett M-A. Measures of need and outcome for primary health care.Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992.
3. Charlson ME, Horwitz RI. Applying results of randomised trials to clinical practice: impact of losses before randomisation. BrMedJ 1984; 289: 1281-1284
4. Tognoni G, Alii C, Avanzdni F, et al.Randomised clinical trials in general practice: lessons from a failure. Br Med7 1991; 303: 969-971.
5. Jonker PL, Sumajow C. Randomised clinical trials in genera] practice (letter). Br Med J1992; 304: 508.
6. Coulter A, McPherson K, Vessey M. Do British women undergo too many or too few hysterectomies? Soc Sci Med1988; 27: 987-994.
7. Royal College of General Practitioners, Office of Population Censuses and Surveys, Department of Health and Social Security. Morbidity statistics from general practice 1981-London: HMSO, 1986.
8. Bradlow J, Coulter A, Brooks P. Patterns of referral. Oxford: Health Services Research Unit, 1992.
9. Department of Health. Terms of service for doctors in general practice. London: HMSO, 1989.
10. Voss S. How much do doctors know about the notification of infectious diseases? BrMedJ1992; 304: 755.
11. Coulter A, Brown S, Daniels A. Computer-held chronic disease registers in general practice: a validation study. J Epidemiol Community Health1989; 43: 25-82.
12. Lawrence M, Coulter A, Jones L. A total audit of preventive procedures in 45 practices caring for 430, 000 patients. Br Med J1990; 301: 273-276.
13. Coulter A, Schofield T. Prevention in general practice: the views of doctors in the Oxford region. Br J Gen Pract1991; 41: 198-201.
14. Murphy E, Spiegal N, Kinmonth A-L. 'Will you help me with my research?' Gaining access to primary care settings and subjects. Br J Gen Pract1992; 42: 162-165.
15. Borgiel A, Dunn E, Lamont C, et al.Recruiting family physicians as participants in research. Fam Pract1989; 6: 168-172.
16. Dillner L. GMC Gets tough with fraudulent doctors. Br MedJ\99l; 303: 1493.
17. Silagy C, Carson N. Factors affecting the level of interest and activity in primary care research among general practitioners. Fam Pract1989; 6: 173-176.
18. Peckham M. Research and development for the National Health Service. Lancet1991; 338: 367-371.
19. Gray DP. Research in general practice: law of inverse opportunity. BrMedJ 1991; 302: 1380-1382.