|
Volumn 971, Issue , 1992, Pages 1487-1499
|
Johnson v. Thompson.
[No Author Info available]
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
DRUG;
DUE PROCESS;
ANENCEPHALUS;
ARTICLE;
DEATH AND EUTHANASIA;
DECISION MAKING;
DISABLED PERSON;
EQUAL PROTECTION;
EUTHANASIA;
HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATION;
HOSPITAL;
HUMAN EXPERIMENT;
HUMAN RIGHTS;
INFORMED CONSENT;
JOHNSON V. THOMPSON;
JURISPRUDENCE;
LEGAL APPROACH;
LEGAL RIGHTS;
NEURAL TUBE DEFECT;
NEWBORN;
NEWBORN DISEASE;
OKLAHOMA CHILDREN'S MEMORIAL HOSPITAL;
PARENT;
PATIENT SELECTION;
PHYSICIAN;
PROGNOSIS;
QUALITY OF LIFE;
REHABILITATION ACT 1973;
SELECTION FOR TREATMENT;
SOCIAL DISCRIMINATION;
SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY;
SOCIOECONOMICS;
SURGERY;
TREATMENT WITHDRAWAL;
UNITED STATES;
DEATH AND EUTHANASIA;
DUE PROCESS;
EQUAL PROTECTION;
JOHNSON V. THOMPSON;
LEGAL APPROACH;
LEGAL RIGHTS;
OKLAHOMA;
OKLAHOMA CHILDREN'S MEMORIAL HOSPITAL;
PARENTAL CONSENT;
REHABILITATION ACT 1973;
SELECTION FOR TREATMENT;
SOCIAL DISCRIMINATION;
ANENCEPHALY;
CIVIL RIGHTS;
CONGENITAL, HEREDITARY, AND NEONATAL DISEASES AND ABNORMALITIES;
DECISION MAKING;
DISABLED PERSONS;
EUTHANASIA, PASSIVE;
HEALTH CARE RATIONING;
HOSPITALS;
HUMAN EXPERIMENTATION;
INFANT, NEWBORN;
JURISPRUDENCE;
OKLAHOMA;
PARENTS;
PATIENT SELECTION;
PHARMACEUTICAL PREPARATIONS;
PHYSICIANS;
PREJUDICE;
PROGNOSIS;
QUALITY OF LIFE;
SOCIOECONOMIC FACTORS;
SPINAL DYSRAPHISM;
SURGERY;
THIRD-PARTY CONSENT;
WITHHOLDING TREATMENT;
|
EID: 0027113871
PISSN: None
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: None Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (2)
|
References (0)
|