Articulatory phonology: An overview

Phonetica

Volumn 49, Issue 3-4, 1992, Pages 155-180

  Browman, Catherine P ^a   Goldstein, Louis ^a  

^a YALE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; PHONETICS; PHYSIOLOGY; REVIEW; SPEECH; SPEECH ANALYSIS;

FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; PHONETICS; SPEECH; SPEECH PRODUCTION MEASUREMENT; SUPPORT, U.S. GOV'T, NON-P.H.S.; SUPPORT, U.S. GOV'T, P.H.S.;

EID: 0027024362     PISSN: 00318388     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1159/000261913     Document Type: Article

References (104)

1. Anderson, S. R.: The organization of phonology (Academic Press. New York 1974).
2. Anderson, S. R.: Nasal consonants and the internal structure of segments. Language 52: 326-344 (1976).
3. Banner-Inouye. S.: The flap as a contour segment. UCLA Work. Pap. Phonet. 72: 40-81 (1989).
4. Barry. M.: A palatographs study of connected speech processes. Cam. Pap. Phonet. Ling. 4 (1985).
5. Beckman. M. E.: Edwards. J.: Fletcher, J.: Prosodie structure and tempo in a sonority model of articulatory dynamics: In Docheny. Ladd. Papers in laboratory phonology II. pp. 68-86 (Cambridge University Press. Cambridge 1992).
6. Bell-Berti, F.; Harris. K. S.: A temporal model of speech production. Phonetica 38: 9-20 (1981).
7. Bell-Berti. F.: Harris. K. S.: Temporal patterns of coarticulation: Lip rounding. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 71: 449-454 (1982).
8. Bird. S.: Constraint-based phonology: PhD diss. Edinburgh 1990.
9. Bird. S.: Klein, E.: Phonological events. J. Ling. 26: 33-56 (1990).
10. Boyce. S. E.: Coarticulatory organization for lip rounding in Turkish and English. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 88: 2584-2595 (1990).
11. Boyce. S. E.: Krakow, R. A.: Bell-Berti. F.: Geifer. C.: Converging sources of evidence for dissecting articulatory movements into core gestures. J. Phonet. 18: 173-188 (1990).
12. Browman. C. P.: Comments on chapter 9: In Docheny. Ladd. Papers in laboratory phonology II. pp. 257-260 (Cambridge University Press. Cambridge 1992).
13. Browman, C. P.; Goldstein. L.: Dynamic modeling of phonetic structure: In Fromkin. Phonetic linguistics. pp. 35-53 (Academic Press. New York 1985).
14. Browman, C. P.; Goldstein, I.: Towards an articulatory phonology. Phonol. 219-252 (1986).
15. Browman. C. P.; Goldstein. L.: Some notes on syllable structure in articulatory phonology. Phonetica 45: 140-155 (1988).
16. Browman. C. P.: Goldstein. L.: Articulatory gestures as phonological units. Phonology 6: 201-251 (1989).
17. Browman. C. P.: Goldstein. L.: Gestural specification using dynamically-de-tined articulatory structures. J. Phonet. 18: 299-320 (1990a).
18. Browman. C. P: Goldstein. L.: Tiers in articulatory phonology, with some implications for casual speech: In Kingston. Beckman, Papers in laboratory phonology I: Between the grammar and physics of speech. pp. 341-376 (Cambridge University Press. Cambridge 1990b).
19. Browman. C. P.: Goldstein. L.: Gesiural structures: Distinctivenes. phonological processes, and historical change: In Maltingly. Sludderl-Kennedy. Modularity and the moior theory of speech perception, pp. 313-338 (Erlbaum. Hillsdale 1991).
20. Browman. C. P.: Goldstein, L.: 'Target-less' schwa: An articulatory analysis: In Docherty. Ladd. Papers in laboratory phonology II. pp. 26-56 (Cambridge University Press. Cambridge 1992).
21. Brown. G.: Lisiening to Spoken English (Longman. London 1977).
22. Byrd. D.: Perception of assimilation in consonant clusters: A gestural model. Phonetica 49: 1-24 (1992).
23. Catford. J. C.: Fundamental problems in phonetics (Indiana University Press. Bloomington 1977).
24. Clements. G. N.: Toward a substantive theory of feature specification. Proc. of NELS 18. vol. 1. pp. 79-89 (1987).
25. Clements. G. N.: Place of articulation in consonants and vowels: A unified theory; in Laks. Rialland. L'architecture el la geometric des representations phonologiqucs (Editions du CNRS. Paris, in press).
26. Cooper. A.: An articulatory account of aspiration in English: PhD diss., Yale University, New Haven (1991).
27. Dalby. J. M.: Phonetic structure of fast speech in American English: PhD diss. Indiana University. Blooming-ton (1984).
28. Diehl. R.: Remarks on Steven's quanta! theory of speech. J. Phonet. 17: 71-78 (1989).
29. Dixit. R. P.: Mechanisms for voicing and aspiration: Hindi and other languages compared. UCLA Work. Pap. Phonet. 67: 49-102 (1987).
30. Dunn. M. H.: A phonetic study of syllable structure in Finnish and Italian. 26th Meet. Chicago Ling. Soc. (1990).
31. Engstrand. O.: Articulatory correlates of stress and speaking rale in Swedish VCV utterances. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 83: 1863-1875 (1988).
32. Farnetani. E.: Kori. S.: Effects of syllable and word structure on segmental durations in spoken Italian. Speech Commun. 5: 17-34 (1986).
33. Ferguson. C. A.: Farwell. C. B.: Words and sounds in early language acquisition. Language 51: 419-439 (1975).
34. Fourakis. M. S.: A phonetic study of sonorant-fricative clusters in two dialects of English. Res. Inst. Phonet. Ind. Univ. 1: 167-200(1980).
35. Fowler. A.: Brady. S.: Curley. S.: The phoneme as an emergent structure: Evidence from speech errors. SRCD Meet. 1991.
36. Fowler. C. A.: Coarticulation and ihco-ries of extrinsic timing control. J. Phonet. 8: 113-133(1980).
37. Fowler. C. A.: Rubin. P.; Remez. R. E.: Turvey, M. T.: Implications for speech production of a general theory of action: In Butlerworth. Language production (Academic Press. New York 1980).
38. Fry. D. B.: The development of the phonological system in the normal and Ihe deaf child: In Smith. Miller. The genesis of language: A psycholingu-istic approach, pp. 187-206 (MIT Press. Cambridge 1966).
39. Fujimura. O.: Elementary gestures and temporal organization -What does an articulatory constraint mean?: In Myers. Laver. Anderson. The cognitive representation of speech, pp. 101-110 (North-Holland, Amsterdam 1981).
40. Fujimura. O.: Sawashima M.: Consonant sequences and laryngeal control. Annu. Bull. Res. Inst. Logoped. Phoniat. Univ. Tokyo 5: 1-6 (1971 ).
41. Gay. T.: Mechanisms in the control of speech rate. Phonetica 38: 148-158 (1981).
42. Gelfer. C. E.; Bell-Berti. F.: Harris. K. S.: Determining the extent of coarticulation: Effects of experimental design. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 186: 2443-2445 (1989).
43. Gimson. A. C.: An introduction to the pronunciation of English (Arnold. London 1962).
44. Goldstein. L.; Browman. C. P.: Representation of voicing contrasts using articulatory gestures. J. Phonet. 14: 339-342 (1986).
45. Guy. G. R.: Variation in the group and the individual: The case of final stop deletion: In Labov, Locating language in time and space, pp. 1-36 (Academic Press. New York 1980).
46. Han. M: The feature of duration in Japanese. Study Sounds 10: 65-80 (1962).
47. Hardcastle. W. J.: Some phonetic and syntactic constraints on lingual co-articulation during the sequences. Speech Collimun. 4: 247-263 (1985).
48. Hawkins. S.: An introduction to task dynamics: In Docherty, Ladd. Papers in laboratory phonology II. pp. 9-25 (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1992).
49. Hirose. H.: Gay. T.: The activity of the intrinsic laryngeal muscles in voicing control: Electromyographic study. Phonetica 25: 140-164 (1972).
50. Huffman. M. K.: Implementation of nasal: Timing and articulatory landmarks. IJCLA Work. Pap. Phonet. 75(1990).
51. Kahn. D.: Syllable-based generalizations in English phonology. (Indiana Univ. Linguistics Club. Blooming-ton 1976).
52. Keating. P. A.: A phonetic and phonological representation of stop consonant voicing. Language 60: 286-319 (1984).
53. Keating. P. A.: CV phonology, experimental phonetics, and coarticula-tion. UCLA Work. Pap. Phonet. 62: 1-13 (1985).
54. Keating. P. A.: Phonetic representations in a generative grammar. J. Phonet. 18: 321-334 (1990).
55. Kelso. J. A. S.; V.-Bateson. E.; Saltzman. E.; Kay. B.: A qualitative dynamic analysis of reiterant speech production: Phase portraits, kinematics, and dynamic modeling. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 77: 266-280 (1985).
56. Kerswill. P. E.: A sociophonclic study of connected speech processes in Cambridge English: An outline and some results. Camb. Pap. Phonet. Exp. Ling. 4 (1985).
57. Kingston. J.: The phonetics and phonology of Ihc timing of oral and glottal events: PhD diss. University of California. Berkeley (1985).
58. Kingston. J.: Articulatory binding: In Kingston. Beckman. Papers in laboratory phonology I: Between the grammar and physics of speech. pp. 406-434 (Cambridge University Press. Cambridge 1990).
59. Krakow, R. A.: The articulatory organization of syllables: A kinematic analysis of labial and veliar gestures: PhD diss., Yale University. New Haven (1989).
60. Ladefoged. P.: A course in phonetics: 2nd ed. (Harcourt Brace. Jovano-vich. New York 1982).
61. Lahiri. A.; Marslen-Wilson. W.: Lexical processing and phonological representation: In Docherty. Ladd. Papers in laboratory phonology II. pp. 229-254 (Cambridge University Press. Cambridge 1992).
62. Liberman. A. M.; Cooper. F.S.; Shankweiler. D. P.: Studdert-Kennedy. M.: Perception of the speech code. Psychol. Rev. 74: 431-461 (1967).
63. Liberman. A. M.; Mattingly. I. G.: The motor theory of speech perception revised. Cognition. 21: 1-36 (1985).
64. Lindblom. B.; Engstrand. O.: In what sense is speech quantal? J. Phonet. 17: 107-121 (1989).
65. Lindblom. B.; MacNeilage. P; Studdert-Kennedy. M.: Self-organizing processes and the explanation of phonological universals: In Butter-worth, Conine. Dahl. Explanations of linguistic universals. pp. 181-203 (Mouton. The Hague 1983).
66. Lindblom. B.; Maddieson. I.: Phonetic universals in consonant systems: In Hyman. Li. Language, speech, and mind. pp. 62-78 (Routledge. London 1988).
67. Lisker. L.: On time and timing in speech: In Sebeok. trends in linguistics. vol. 12. pp. 2387-2418 (Mouton. The Hague 1974).
68. Lisker. L.; Abramson. A. S.: A cross-language study of voicing in initial stops: Acoustical measurements. Word. 20: 385-422 (1964).
69. Lisker. I.; Baer. T.: Laryngeal management at utterance-internal word boundary in American English. Lang. Speech. 27: 163-171 (1984).
70. Locke. J. L.: Phonological acquisition and change (Academic Press. New York. 1983).
71. Manuel. S. Y.; V.-Bateson. F.: Oral and glottal gestures and acoustics of underlying III in English. J. acoust. St K. Am. 84: S84 (1988).
72. Mattingly. I. G.: Phonetic representation and speech synthesis by rule: In Myers. Laver. Anderson. The cognitive representation of speech, pp. 415-420 (North-Holland. Amsterdam 1981).
73. McCarthy. J. J.: Feature geometry and dependency: A review. Phonetica. 45: 84-108 (1988).
74. Mowrey. R. A.; MacKay. I. R. A.: Phonological primitives: Electromyographic speech error evidence. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 11: 1299-1312 (1990).
75. Munhall. K.; Löfqvist. L.: Gestural aggregation in speech: Laryngeal gestures. J. Phonet. 20: 111-126 (1992).
76. Munhall. K. G.; Ostry. D. J.; Parush. A.: Characteristics of velocity profiles of speech movements. J. Exp. Psychol.: Hum. Pere. Perf. 11: (1985).
77. Nittrouer, S.; Studdert-Kennedy, M.; McGowan. R.: The emergence of phonetic segments: Evidence from the spectral structure of fricative-vowel syllables as spoken by children and adults. J. Speech Hear. Res. 32: 120-132 (1989).
78. Nolan. F.: The descriptive role of segments: Evidence from assimilation: In Docherty, Ladd. Papers in laboratory phonology II. pp. 261-280 (Cambridge University Press. Cambridge 1992).
79. Ohala. J.J.: Experimental historical phonology; in Anderson. Jones. Historical linguistics, pp. 353-389 (North Holland. Amsterdam 1974).
80. Ohman. S. E. G.: Numerical model of coarticulation. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 41: 310-320 (1967).
81. Padgett. J.: Stricture in feature geometry: PhD diss. University of Massachusetts. Amherst (1991).
82. Pierrehumbert. J.: Phonological and phonetic representation. J. Phonet. 3: 375-394 (1990).
83. Pierrehumbert. J.; Talkin. D.: Lcnition of /h/ and glottal stop: In Docherty. Ladd. Papers in laboratory phonology II. PP-. 90-117 (Cambridge University Press. Cambridge 1992).
84. Port. R. F.; Dalby. J.; O'Dell. M.: Evidence for mora timing in Japanese. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 81: 1574-1585 (1987).
85. Sagey. E. C.: The representation of features and relations in non-linear phonology: PhD Diss. MIT. Cambridge (1986).
86. Saltzman, E.: Task dynamic coordination of the speech articulators: A preliminary model: In Heuer. Fromm. Experimental brain research series 15, pp. 129-144 (Springer. New York 1986).
87. Saltzman. E.; Kelso. J. A. S.: Skilled actions: A task dynamic approach. Psychol. Rev. 94: 84-106 (1987).
88. Saltzman. E. L.; Munhall. K. G.: A dynamical approach to gestural patterning in speech production. Ecol. Psychol. 1: 333-382(1989).
89. Schiefer. L.: 'Voiced aspirated' or 'breathy voiced' and the case for articulatory phonology. Forschungsber. Inst. Phonet. sprachl. Kommun. Univ. München. 27: 257-278 (1989).
90. Smith. C.: A cross-linguistic contrast in consonant and vowel timing. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 86: S84 (1988).
91. Smith. C.: The timing of vowel and consonant gestures in Italian and Japanese. Proc. 12th Int. Congr. Phonet. Sci. 4: 234-237 (1991).
92. Smith, C.; Browman. C. P.; Mc Gowan. R.; Kay. B.: Extracting dynamic parameters from speech movement data (submitted).
93. Sproat. R.; Fujimura. O.: Articulatory evidence for the non-categoricalness of English III allophones. LSA Ann. Meet. Washington. 1989.
94. Sproat. R.; Fujimura, O.: Allophonic variation in English III and its implications for phonetic implementation (submitted).
95. Steriade. D.: Redundant values. CLS. 21: 339-363 (1987).
96. Stevens. K. N.: Phonetic evidence for hierarchies of features: In Keating. Papers in Laboratory Phonology III (Cambridge University Press. Cambridge. in press).
97. Stevens. K. N.: On the quantal nature of speech. J. Phonet. 17: 3-45 (1989).
98. Studdert-Kennedy. M.: The phoneme as a perceptuomotor structure: In All-port. MacKay. Prinz. Scheerer. Language perception and production, pp. 67-84 (Academic Press. London 1987).
99. Studdert-Kennedy. M.; Goodell. E. W.: Gestures, features and segments in early child speech: In de Gelder. Moráis, Language and literacy: Comparative approaches (MIT Press. Cambridge MA. in press).
100. Turvey. M. T.: Preliminaries to a theory of action with reference io vision: In Shaw. Bransford. Perceiving, acting and knowing: Toward an ecological psychology (Erlbaum Associates. Hillsdale 1977).
101. Vihman. M. M.: Ontogeny of phonetic-gestures: Speech production: In Mat-lingly. Studdert-Kennedy. Modularity and the motor theory of speech perception, pp. 69-84 (Erlbaum. Hillsdale. NJ 1991).
102. Yoshioka. H.; Lofqvist. A.; Hirose. H.: Laryngeal adjustments in the production of consonant clusters anil geminates in American English. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 70: 1615-1623 (1981).
103. Zsiga. E. C.: Gradient rules in phonology and phonetics: Yale University (in preparation).
104. Zsiga. E. C.; Byrd. D.: Acoustic evidence for gestural overlap in consonant sequences. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 88: S82 (1990).