|
Volumn 25, Issue 4, 1992, Pages 921-941
|
Abortion compromise -- inevitable and impossible.
a
a
NONE
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
DUE PROCESS;
ARTICLE;
CONSTITUTIONAL LAW;
COUNSELING;
FEMALE;
FEMALES;
FETUS;
GENETICS AND REPRODUCTION;
GOVERNMENT;
GOVERNMENT REGULATION;
HUMAN RIGHTS;
INDIVIDUALITY;
INDUCED ABORTION;
JURISPRUDENCE;
LEGAL APPROACH;
LEGAL RIGHTS;
PERSONHOOD;
PHYSICIAN;
PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA V. CASEY;
POLICY;
PREGNANCY;
SOCIAL CONTROL;
SOCIAL DISCRIMINATION;
SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY;
SPOUSAL NOTIFICATION;
SPOUSE;
UNITED STATES;
WEBSTER V. REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH SERVICES;
CONSTITUTIONAL LAW;
DUE PROCESS;
FEDERAL GOVERNMENT;
FEMALES;
GENETICS AND REPRODUCTION;
GOVERNMENT REGULATION;
LEGAL APPROACH;
LEGAL RIGHTS;
PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA V. CASEY;
PREGNANT WOMEN;
SOCIAL DISCRIMINATION;
SPOUSAL NOTIFICATION;
SUPREME COURT DECISIONS;
UNITED STATES;
WEBSTER V. REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH SERVICES;
ABORTION, INDUCED;
CIVIL RIGHTS;
COUNSELING;
FETUS;
FREEDOM;
GOVERNMENT;
INDIVIDUALITY;
JURISPRUDENCE;
LEGISLATION;
PERSONHOOD;
PHYSICIANS;
PREGNANCY;
PREJUDICE;
PUBLIC POLICY;
SOCIAL CONTROL, FORMAL;
SPOUSES;
STATE GOVERNMENT;
UNITED STATES;
WOMEN;
WOMEN'S RIGHTS;
|
EID: 0027019040
PISSN: 02769948
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: None Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (6)
|
References (0)
|