|
|
|
Volumn 68, Issue 1, 1992, Pages 205-232
|
|
Selling the womb: can the feminist critique of surrogacy be answered?
a
a
NONE
|
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
|
Indexed keywords
ADOPTION;
ARTICLE;
ARTIFICIAL INSEMINATION;
CHILD;
CHILD PARENT RELATION;
CONTRACT;
COUNSELING;
DONOR;
EMBRYO TRANSFER;
ETHICS;
FEE;
FEMALE;
FEMALES;
FEMINIST ETHICS;
FERTILIZATION IN VITRO;
GENETICS AND REPRODUCTION;
GOVERNMENT;
GOVERNMENT REGULATION;
HUMAN RIGHTS;
IN RE BABY M;
INCENTIVES;
INDUCED ABORTION;
INFERTILITY;
INFORMED CONSENT;
JOHNSON V. CALVERT;
JUDICIAL ACTION;
JURISPRUDENCE;
LEGAL APPROACH;
LEGAL RIGHTS;
MALE;
MOTHER;
MOTIVATION;
OVUM DONORS;
REMUNERATION;
SOCIAL CONTROL;
SOCIAL DOMINANCE;
SOCIAL IMPACT;
SOCIOECONOMICS;
SOCIOLOGY;
SPOUSAL CONSENT;
UNITED STATES;
CALIFORNIA;
CONTRACTS;
FEMALES;
FEMINIST ETHICS;
GENETICS AND REPRODUCTION;
GOVERNMENT REGULATION;
IN RE BABY M;
INCENTIVES;
JOHNSON V. CALVERT;
JUDICIAL ACTION;
LEGAL APPROACH;
LEGAL RIGHTS;
MALES;
NEW HAMPSHIRE;
NEW JERSEY;
OVUM DONORS;
REMUNERATION;
SOCIAL IMPACT;
SPOUSAL CONSENT;
UNITED STATES;
VIRGINIA;
ABORTION, INDUCED;
ADOPTION;
CALIFORNIA;
CHILD;
CIVIL RIGHTS;
COUNSELING;
EMBRYO TRANSFER;
FEES AND CHARGES;
FEMINISM;
FERTILIZATION IN VITRO;
INFERTILITY;
INFORMED CONSENT;
INSEMINATION, ARTIFICIAL;
JURISPRUDENCE;
LEGISLATION;
MEN;
MOTIVATION;
NEW HAMPSHIRE;
NEW JERSEY;
PARENT-CHILD RELATIONS;
SOCIAL CHANGE;
SOCIAL CONTROL, FORMAL;
SOCIAL DOMINANCE;
SOCIOECONOMIC FACTORS;
STATE GOVERNMENT;
SURROGATE MOTHERS;
THIRD-PARTY CONSENT;
TISSUE DONORS;
UNITED STATES;
VIRGINIA;
WOMEN;
WOMEN'S RIGHTS;
|
|
EID: 0027010760
PISSN: 00196665
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: None Document Type: Article |
|
Times cited : (14)
|
|
References (0)
|
