A case study of ces: A distributed collaborative editing system implemented in argus

IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering

Volumn 18, Issue 9, 1992, Pages 827-839

  Greif, Irene ^a   Seliger, Robert ^b   Weihl, William ^b  

^a MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^b MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER PROGRAMMING LANGUAGES; DISTRIBUTED COMPUTER SYSTEMS;

ARGUS (PROGRAMMING LANGUAGE); COLLABORATIVE EDITTING SYSTEM (CES);

COMPUTER SOFTWARE;

EID: 0026917601     PISSN: 00985589     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1109/32.159831     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. J. E. Allchin, “An architecture for reliable decentralized systems,” Ph.D. dissertation, Georgia Institute of Technology, Sept. 1983. (Available as Technical Report GIT-ICS-83123.)
2. A. Black et al., “Distribution and abstract types in Emerald,” IEEE Trans. Software Eng., vol. SE-13, pp. 65–76, Jan. 1987.
3. A. Black, “Supporting distributed applications: experience with Eden,” in Proc. Tenth Symp. Operating Systems Principles, pp. 181–193, Dec. 1985.
4. O.-J Dahl et al., “The Simula 67 common base language,” Publication No. S-22, Norwegian Computing Center, Oslo, 1970.
5. M. Day, “Replication and reconfiguration in a distributed mail reposi-tory,” Masters thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dec. 1986.
6. D. C. Englebart, “Toward high-performance knowledge workers,” Office Automation Conference Digest, AFIPS, pp. 279–290, Apr. 1982.
7. K. P. Eswaran et al., “The notions of consistency and predicate locks in a database system,” Comm. ACM 19, pp. 624–633, Nov. 1976.
8. D. K. Gifford, “Weighted voting for replicated data,” in Proc. Seventh Symp. Operating Systems Principles, pp. 150–162, Dec. 1979.
9. D. K. Gifford and J. E. Donahue, “Coordinating independent atomic actions,” in Proc. IEEE CompCon85, pp. 92–94, Feb. 1985.
10. A. Goldberg and D. Robson, Smalltalk-80: The Language and its Implementation. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1983.
11. I. Greif, “Teleconferencing and the computer-based office workstation,” Teleconferencing and Interactive Media '82, Madison, WI, May 1982.
12. M. Herlihy and B. Liskov, “A value transmission method for abstract data types,” ACM Trans. Programming Languages and Systems, vol. 4, pp. 527–551 Oct. 1982.
13. C.A.R. Hoare, “Monitors: An operating system structuring concept,” Communications of the ACM 17, pp. 549–557, Oct. 1974.
14. L. Lamport, “Time, clocks, and the ordering of events in a distributed system,” Commun. ACM 21, pp. 558–565, July 1978.
15. B. W. Lampson and D. D. Redell, “Experience with processes and monitors in Mesa,” CACM 23, pp. 105–117, Feb. 1980.
16. B. Lampson, “Lecture notes in computer science,. Volume 105: Atomic transactions,” in Distributed Systems: Architecture and Implementation, Goos and Hartmanis, Eds. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1981, 246–265.
17. B. Liskov and R. Scheifler, “Guardians and actions: Linguistic support for robust, distributed programs,” ACM Trans. Programming Languages and Systems, Vol. 5, pp. 381-104, July 1983.
18. B. Liskov and W. Weihl, “Specifications of distributed programs,” Distributed Computing 1, pp. 102–118, 1986
19. B. Liskov et al., CLU reference manual, in Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Goos and Hartmanis, Ed. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1981.
20. B. Liskov et al, “The implementation of Argus,” in Proc. Eleventh ACM Symp. Operating Systems Principles, pp. 111–122, Nov. 1987.
21. B. Oki et al, “Reliable object storage to support atomic actions,” in Proc. Tenth ACM Symp. Operating Systems Principles, Dec. 1985.
22. S. Perl, “Distributed commit protocols for nested actions,” Masters thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Oct. 1987.
23. B. Randell, “System structure for software fault tolerance,” IEEE Trans. Software Eng., vol. SE-1, pp. 220–232, June 1975.
24. S. Sarin and I. Greif, “Software for interactive on-line conferences,” in Proc. Second Conf. Office Information Systems, June 1984, pp. 46–58.
25. S. Sarin and I. Greif, “Computer-based real-time conferences,” IEEE Computer, Vol. 18, pp. 33-45, Oct. 1985.
26. R. Seliger, “The design and implementation of a distributed program for collaborative editing,” Masters thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Sept. 1985.
27. S. Sluizer and P. Cashman, “XCP: An experimental tool for managing cooperative activity,” in Proc. ACM Computer Science Conf, ACM, Mar. 1985.
28. A. Z. Spector et al., “Support for distributed transactions in the TABS prototype,” Tech. Rep. CMU-CS-84-132, Carnegie-Mellon University, July, 1984.
29. A. Tanenbaum and R. Renesse, “Distributed operating systems,” Computing Surveys 17, pp. 419—470, Dec. 1985.
30. R.H.A. Trigg, “A network-based approach to text handling,” Ph.D. dissertation, Univ. Maryland, Nov. 1983.
31. W. E. Weihl, “Specification and implementation of atomic data types,” Ph.D. dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Mar. 1984.
32. W. E. Weihl, “Distributed version management for read-only actions,” IEEE Trans. Software Eng., vol. SE-13, pp. 55–64, Jan. 1987.
33. W. E. Weihl, “Local atomicity properties: Modular concurrency control for abstract data types,” ACM Trans. Programming Languages and Systems 11, pp. 249–283, Apr. 1989.
34. W. E. Weihl, “Linguistic support for atomic data types,” ACM Trans. Programming Languages and Systems, vol. 12, pp. 178–202, Apr. 1990.
35. W. Weihl and B. Liskov, “Implementation of resilient, atomic data types,” ACM Trans. Programming Languages and Systems 7, Apr. 1985.