Distinguishability in Impedance Imaging

IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering

Volumn 39, Issue 8, 1992, Pages 852-860

  Cheney, Margaret ^a   Isaacson, David ^a  

^a RENSSELAER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ELECTRIC CONDUCTIVITY--IMAGING TECHNIQUES; ELECTRIC FIELD EFFECTS--MATHEMATICAL MODELS; MATHEMATICAL TECHNIQUES--TOPOLOGY; PATTERN RECOGNITION--THEORY;

APPLIED POTENTIAL TOMOGRAPHY; CONDUCTIVITY DISTRIBUTION DISTINGUISHABILITY; ELECTRIC CURRENT COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; IMPEDANCE IMAGING SYSTEMS; SOBOLEV NORMS; SOBOLEV SPACES;

COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY;

ARTICLE; ELECTRIC CONDUCTIVITY; ELECTRIC POTENTIAL; ELECTRODE; IMAGING SYSTEM; IMPEDANCE; MATHEMATICAL MODEL;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; ELECTRIC CONDUCTIVITY; ELECTRODES; EVALUATION STUDIES; PLETHYSMOGRAPHY, IMPEDANCE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SUPPORT, U.S. GOV'T, NON-P.H.S.; SUPPORT, U.S. GOV'T, P.H.S.;

EID: 0026902276     PISSN: 00189294     EISSN: 15582531     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1109/10.148393     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. R. A. Adams, Sobolev Spaces. New York: Academic, 1975.
2. D. C. Barber and B. H. Brown, “Applied potential tomography,” J. Phys. E. Sci. Instrum., vol. 17, pp. 723–733, 1984.
3. K.-S. Cheng, D. Isaacson, J. C. Newell, and D. G. Gisser, “Electrode models for electric current computed tomography,” IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., vol. 36, pp. 918–924, 1989.
4. M. Cheney, D. Isaacson, J. C. Newell, J. C. Goble, and S. Simske, “NOSER: An algorithm for solving the inverse conductivity problem,” Internat. J. Imaging Syst. Technol., vol. 2, pp. 66–75, 1990.
5. R. Courant and D. Hilbert, Methods of Mathematical Physics, Vol. I. New York: Interscience, 1937.
6. W. Daily, W. Lin, and T. Buscheck, “Hydrological properties of Topapah Spring tuff: Laboratory measurements,” J. Geophys. Res., vol. 92, pp. 7854–7864, 1987.
7. L. F. Fuks, M. Cheney, D. Isaacson, D. G. Gisser and J. C. Newell, “Detection and imaging of electric conductivity and permittivity at low frequency,” IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., vol. 38, pp. 1106–1110, 1991.
8. P. Grisvard, Elliptic Problems in Nonsmooth Domains. Boston: Pitman, 1985.
9. D. G. Gisser, D. Isaacson, and J. C. Newell, “Current topics in impedance imaging,” Clin. Phys. Physiol. Meas., vol. 8, Suppl. A, pp. 39–46, 1987.
10. D. G. Gisser, D. Isaacson, and J. C. Newell, “Theory and performance of an adaptive current tomography system,” Clin. Phys. Physiol. Meas., vol. 9, suppl. A, pp. 35–41, 1988.
11. “Electric current computed tomography and eigenvalues,” SIAM J. Appl. Math., vol. 50, pp. 1623–1634, 1990.
12. D. Isaacson, “Distinguishability of conductivities by electric current computed tomography,” IEEE Trans. Med. Imag., vol. MI-5, pp. 91–95, 1986.
13. D. Isaacson and M. Cheney, “Current problems in impedance imaging,” in Inverse Problems in Partial Differential Equations, D. Colton, R. Ewing, and W. Rundell, Eds. Philadelphia: SIAM, 1990.
14. “Effects of measurement precision and finite numbers of electrodes on linear impedance imaging algorithms,” SIAM J. Appl. Math., vol. 51, pp. 1705–1731, 1991.
15. E. Isaacson and H. B. Keller, Analysis of Numerical Methods. New York: Wiley, 1966.
16. Y. Katznelson, An Introduction to Harmonic Analysis. New York: Dover, 1976.
17. J. P. Keener, Principles of Applied Mathematics. New York: Addison-Wesley, 1988.
18. J. C. Newell, D. G. Gisser, and D. Isaacson, “An electric current tomograph,” IEEE Trans. Biomed Eng., vol. 35, pp. 828–833, 1988.
19. A. D. Seagar and R. H. T. Bates, “Full-wave computed tomography, Part 4: Low frequency electric current CT,” IEE Proc., vol. 132A, pp. 455–466, 1985.
20. E. Somersalo, M. Cheney, and D. Isaacson, “Electrode models for electric current computed tomography,” SIAM J. Appl. Math., in press.
21. A. D. Seager, T. S. Yeo, and R. H. T. Bates, “Full-wave computed tomography, Part 2: Resolution limits,” IEE Proc., vol. 131A, pp. 616–622, 1984.
22. F. Treves, Basic Linear Partial Differential Equations. New York: Academic, 1975.