Toward Objective, Systematic Design-Method Comparisons

IEEE Software

Volumn 9, Issue 3, 1992, Pages 43-53

  Song, Xiping ^a   Osterweil, Leon J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

SOFTWARE DESIGN METHODOLOGIES; SOFTWARE FUNCTION FRAMEWORKS; SOFTWARE MODELING FORMALISM;

COMPUTER SOFTWARE;

EID: 0026869935     PISSN: 07407459     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1109/52.136166     Document Type: Article

References (8)

1. Computer Science and Technology Board, “Scaling Up: A Research Agenda for Software Engineering,” Comm. ACM, Mar. 1990, pp. 281–293.
2. X. Song and L.J. Osterweil, “Comparing Design Methodologies Through Process Modeling,” Proc. 1st Int'l Conf. Software Process, IEEE CS Press, Los Alamitos, Calif., 1991, pp. 29–44.
3. H.G. Sol, “A Feature Analysis of Information Systems Design Methodologies: Methodological Considerations,” Information Systems Design Methodologies: A Feature Analysis, T.W. Olle, H.G. Sol, and C.J. Tully, eds., Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1983, pp. 1–8.
4. L.J. Osterweil, “Software Processes Are Software Too,” Proc. 9th Int'l Conf. Software Eng., IEEE CS Press, Los Alamitos, Calif., 1987, pp. 2–13.
5. X. Song and L.J. Osterweil, “Evolutionary Development Toward Objective and Systematic Comparisons of Software Design Methodologies,” Arcadia Tech. Report UCI-91-18, Univ. of Calif., Irvine, 1991.
6. T. Katayama, “A Hierarchical and Functional Software Process Description and Its Enaction,” Proc. 11th Int'l Conf. Software Eng., IEEE CS Press, Los Alamitos, Calif., 1989, pp. 343–352.
7. X. Song and L.J. Osterweil, “Models of Software Design Methodologies,” Arcadia Tech. Report UCI-91-19, Univ. of Calif., Irvine, 1991.
8. C.H. Kung, “An Analysis of Three Conceptual Models with Time Perspective,” Information Systems Design Methodologies: A Feature Analysis, T.W. Olle, H.G. Sol, and C.J. Tully, eds., Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1983, pp. 141–168.