Psychomotor testing and the ability to perform an anastomosis in junior surgical trainees

British Journal of Surgery

Volumn 79, Issue 10, 1992, Pages 1065-1067

  Steele, R J C ^a   Walder, C ^a   Herbert, M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANASTOMOSIS; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONFERENCE PAPER; FEMALE; HUMAN; JEJUNUM; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOMOTOR ACTIVITY; SURGERY; SURGICAL TRAINING; TECHNIQUE;

ADULT; ANASTOMOSIS, SURGICAL; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MEDICAL STAFF, HOSPITAL; MOTOR SKILLS; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; SUPPORT, NON-U.S. GOV'T; SURGERY;

EID: 0026738487     PISSN: 00071323     EISSN: 13652168     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/bjs.1800791025     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Surgical technique
2. Surgical technique
3. Surgical research in training
4. Introducing aptitude testing into medicine
5. Selection of surgical trainees in the Netherlands
6. Simulation in surgical training using freeze dried material
7. Surgical technique, art and craft
8. Anastomotic integrity after operations for large‐bowel cancer: a multi‐centre study
9. Impact of variability among surgeons on postoperative morbidity and mortality and ultimate survival
10. Clinical performance versus in‐training examination as measures of surgical competence
11. Neuropsychologic predictors of operative skill among general surgery residents
12. Does the in‐service training examination correlate with clinical performance in surgery?
13. Objective comparison of manual dexterity in physicians and surgeons
14. Personality organisation in cognitive controls and intellectual abilities
15. Rod‐and‐frame test performance among naval aviation personnel
16. A study of the relationship between flexibility of closure and surgical skill
17. Field articulation testing: a predictor of technical skills in surgical residents
18. Academic and personal predictors of clinical success in medical school
19. Further evidence of sex‐linked major gene influence on human spatial visualising ability
20. A study of X‐chromosome linkage with fielddependence and spatial visualising