High-versus low-dose oxytocin for labor stimulation

Obstetrics and Gynecology

Volumn 80, Issue 1, 1992, Pages 111-116

  Satin, Andrew J ^a   Leveno, Kenneth J ^a   Sherman, M Lynne ^a   Brewster, Doris S ^a   Cunningham, F Gary ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

OXYTOCIN;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CESAREAN SECTION; FEMALE; HUMAN; LABOR INDUCTION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

ADULT; CESAREAN SECTION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DYSTOCIA; FEMALE; HUMAN; LABOR COMPLICATIONS; OXYTOCIN; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 0026643548     PISSN: 00297844     EISSN: 1873233X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (5)

1. Shiono PH, McNellis D, Rhoads GG. Reasons for the rising cesarean delivery rates: 1978-1984. Obstet Gynecol 1987;69:696-700.
2. Committee on Obstetrics: Maternal and Fetal Medicine, The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Induction and augmentation of labor. ACOG technical bulletin no. 110. Washington, DC: American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, 1987.
3. Seitchik J, Amico J, Robinson AG, Castillo M. Oxytocin augmentation of dysfunctional labor. IV. Oxytocin pharmacokinetics. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1984;150:225-8.
4. O’Driscoll K, Foley M, MacDonald D. Active management of labor as an alternative to cesarean section for dystocia. Obstet Gynecol 1984;63:485-90.
5. O’Driscoll K, Meagher D. Active management of labor. London: WB Saunders, 1980:23-31, 130-8.