Interference between switched tasks

Ergonomics

Volumn 35, Issue 1, 1992, Pages 25-36

  Cellier, Jean Marie ^a   Eyrolle, HÉlÈne ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ TOULOUSE JEAN JAURÈS   (France)

Author keywords

Dual tasks; Interference; Resources; Time sharing

Indexed keywords

INFORMATION THEORY--CHANNEL CAPACITY; INTERFERENCE; JOB ANALYSIS; SWITCHING THEORY; SYSTEMS SCIENCE AND CYBERNETICS--COGNITIVE SYSTEMS; SYSTEMS SCIENCE AND CYBERNETICS--MAN MACHINE SYSTEMS;

DUAL TASKS; MULTIPLE RESOURCES; TASK SWITCHING;

COMPUTER SYSTEMS, DIGITAL;

ARTICLE; CONFUSION; ERROR; HYPOTHESIS; JOB PERFORMANCE; TASK PERFORMANCE;

EID: 0026537007     PISSN: 00140139     EISSN: 13665847     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00140139208967795     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Allport, D. A., Antonis, B. and Reynolds, P. 1972, One the division of attention: a disproof of the single channel hypothesis, Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 24, 225-235.
2. Bainbrjdge, L. 1984, Diagnostic skills in process operation, in Proceedings of 1984 International Conference on Occupational Ergonomics, Toronto, Vo. 2, 1-10.
3. Bobrow, D. G. and Norman, D. A. 1975, Some principles of memory schemata, in D. G. Bobrow and A. Colins (eds) Representation and Understanding (Academic Press, London). ’
4. Briggs, G., Peters, G. and Fisher, P. 1972, On the locus of divided attention effects, Perception and Psychophysics, 11, 315-320.
5. Broadbent, D. E. 1958, Perception and Communication (Pergamon Press, New York).
6. Damos, D. L., and Lyall, E. A. 1985, The efTect of varying stimulus and response modes and asymmetric transfer on the dual-task performance of discrete tasks, Ergonomics, 29, 4, 519-533.
7. Damos, D. L., Smist, T. E. and Bittner, A. C. 1983, Individual differences in multiple-task performance as a function of response strategy, Human Factors, 25, 2, 215-226.
8. Deutsch, J. A. and Deutsch, D. 1963, Attention: some theoretical considerations, Psychological Review, 70, 80-90.
9. Eyrolle, H. and Paquiot, J. 1989, Activity de gestion des taches en situation de temps partagd. Approche expdrimentale des interferences dans Pactivitd, de traitement, These de Doctorat, Universite Toulouse II.
10. Fodor, T. 1983, The Modularity of Mind (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).
11. Friedman, A., Polson, M. and Dafoe, C. G. 1988, Dividing attention between the hands and the head: performance trade-offs between rapid finger tapping and verbal memory, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Perception and Performance, 14, 60-68.
12. Goldstein, I. L and Dorfman, P. W. 1978, Speed and load stress as determinants of performance in a time-sharing task, Human Factors, 20, 5, 603-609.
13. Goldstein, F. C. and Rollins, H. A. 1986, Multiple resources: the concepts of task difficulty and response requirements, Bulletin of the Psychonomics Society, 24, 3, 189-192.
14. Griffon-Fouco, M. and Ghertman, F. 1984, Recueil de donndes sur les facteurs humains a Electricitd de France, in Operational Safety of Nuclear Power Plants, Vienna, International Atomic Energy Agency, 157-172.
15. Helm, W. R., Fishburne, R. P. and Waag, W. L. 1978, Channel capacity and locus of interference under dual-task conditions, Perceptual and Motor Skills, 46, 659-666.
16. Hirst, W. and Kalmar, D. 1987, Characterizing attentional resources, Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 116, 1, 40-49.
17. Kahneman, D. 1973, Attention and Effort (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs).
18. Keele, S. W. 1973, Attention and Human Performance (Goodyear, Pacific Palisades, CA).
19. Knowles, W. B. 1963, Operator loading tasks, Human Factors, 5, 2, 155-162.
20. Leplat, J. 1982, Les situations de travail, terrains d’avenir pour la Psychologie, in P. Fraisse (ed.), Psychologie de demain (PUF, Paris), 311-330.
21. McLeod, P. 1977, A dual-task response modality effect: support for multiprocessor models of attention, Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 29, 651-677.
22. Navon, D. and Gopher, D. 1979, On the economy of the human processing system, Psychological Review, 86, 3, 214-255.
23. Navon, D. and Gopher, D. 1980, Task difficulty, resources, and dual task performance, in J. Nickerson (ed.), Attention and Performance (Lawrence, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ), 297-315.
24. Norman, D. A. 1981, Categorization of actions slips, Psychological Review, 88, 1, 1-15.
25. Norman, D. A. and Bobrow, D. G. 1975, On data-limited and resource limited processes, Cognitive Psychology, 7, 44-64.
26. Norman, D. A. and Rumelhart, D. E. 1975, Explorations in Cognition (Freeman, San Francisco, CA).
27. Paquiot, J., Eyrolle, H. and Cellier, J-M. 1986, Consequences de Pinterference entre taches de saisie sur la dur£e des trailements et Poccurrence des erreurs, in R. Patesson (ed.), L’homme et lecran (Editions de Puniversitd de Bruxelles), 199-209.
28. Posner, M. I. and Snyder, C. R. R. 1975, Facilitation and inhibition in the processing of signals, in P. M. A. Rabitt and S. Dornic (eds), Attention and Performance (Academic Press, New York), 669-682.
29. Shiffrin, R. M. and Schneider, W. 1977, Controlled and automatic human information processing: 2—Perceptual learning, automatic attending and a general theory, Psychological Review, 84, 127-190.
30. Treisman, A. M. 1964, Selective attention in man, British Medical Bulletin, 20, 12-16.
31. Welford, A. T. 1967, Single channel operation in the brain, Acta Psychologica, 27, 5-22.
32. Wicicens, C. D. 1980, The structure of attentional resource, in R. Nickerson (ed.), Attention and Performance (Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ), 239-257.
33. Wickens, C. D. 1984, Processing resources in attention, in R. Parasuraman and P. R. Davies (eds), Varieties of attention (Academic Press, Orlando), 63-102.
34. Wickens, C. D. 1989, Attention and skill, in D. Holding (ed.), Human Skills (J. Wiley, Chichester), 72-105.
35. Wickens, C. D., Mountford, S. J. and Schreiner, W. 1981, Multiple resource, task-hemispheric integrity, and individual differences in time-sharing, Human Factors, 23, 2, 211-229.