Bias in relative odds estimation owing to imprecise measurement of correlated exposures

Statistics in Medicine

Volumn 11, Issue 7, 1992, Pages 953-961

  Phillips, Andrew N ^a,c   Smith, George Davey ^b  

^a ROYAL FREE HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^b LONDON SCHOOL OF HYGIENE AND TROPICAL MEDICINE   (United Kingdom)

^c MEDICAL RESEARCH COUNCIL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; CALCULATION; EPIDEMIOLOGY; ETIOLOGY; EXPOSURE; MEASUREMENT; RISK FACTOR; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

BIAS (EPIDEMIOLOGY); CONFOUNDING FACTORS (EPIDEMIOLOGY); EPIDEMIOLOGIC METHODS; HUMAN; LOGISTIC MODELS; ODDS RATIO; RESEARCH DESIGN;

EID: 0026536385     PISSN: 02776715     EISSN: 10970258     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/sim.4780110712     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Epidemiology as a guide to clinical decisions: The association between triglyceride and coronary heart disease
2. High‐density lipoprotein – the clinical implications of recent studies
3. The diet‐heart idea. Outline of a history
4. High density lipoprotein cholesterol as a predictor of cardiovascular disease mortality in men and women: the follow‐up study of the lipid research clinics prevalence study
5. A review of the effects of random measurement error on relative risk estimates in epidemiological studies
6. Correction of logistic regression relative risk estimates and confidence intervals for systematic within‐person measurement error
7. Methodological issues in case‐control studies III—The effect of joint misclassification of risk factors and confounding factors upon estimation and power
8. Confounding and misclassification
9. Correction of logistic regression relative risk estimates and confidence intervals for measurement error: the case of multiple covariates measured with error
10. Workshop on errors‐in‐variables
11. Latent class analysis in chronic disease epidemiology
12. Estimating and correcting for confounder misclassification
13. How independent are ‘‘independent’’ effects? Relative risk estimation when correlated exposures are measured imprecisely
14. Effects of the use of unreliable surrogate variables on the validity of epidemiologic research studies
15. The effect of misclassification in the presence of covariates
16. Misclassification in case‐control studies with two dichotomous risk factors
17. Misclassification in more than one factor in a case‐control study: a combination of Mantel–Haenszel and maximum likelihood approaches
18. Smoking and cervical cancer–current status: a review
19. Declaring independence. Why we should be cautious