Academic-Industry Relationships in the Life Sciences: Extent, Consequences, and Management

JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association

Volumn 268, Issue 23, 1992, Pages 3344-3349

  Blumenthal, David ^a  

^a MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT; ARTICLE; BIOTECHNOLOGY; CORRELATION FUNCTION; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; HEALTH CENTER; HEALTH EDUCATION; INDUSTRY; LIFE; MANAGEMENT; MEDICAL RESEARCH; MEDICINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PRODUCTIVITY; PROFIT; PUBLIC HEALTH; RISK ASSESSMENT; SCIENCE;

ADMINISTRATORS; BIOMEDICAL AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; CLINICAL APPROACH/SOURCE; FEDERAL GOVERNMENT; GOVERNMENT REGULATION; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; INSTITUTIONAL POLICIES; OBLIGATIONS TO SOCIETY; PROPERTY RIGHTS; REMUNERATION; RISKS AND BENEFITS; UNITED STATES;

BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES; DISCLOSURE; INDUSTRY; INTERINSTITUTIONAL RELATIONS; POLICY MAKING; RESEARCH; UNIVERSITIES;

EID: 0026484410     PISSN: 00987484     EISSN: 15383598     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1001/jama.1992.03490230074031     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. General Accounting Office. Controlling Inappropriate Access to Federally Funded Research Results. Washington, DC: US General Accounting Office; 1992. General Accounting Office publication RCED-92-104.
2. Hearings Before the Committee on Government Operations of the Human Resources and Intergovernmental Relations Subcommittee, 101st Cong, 1st Sess (June 13,1989) (Is Science for Sale? Conflicts of Interest v the Public Interest).
3. Hearings Before the Committee on Government Operations of the Human Resources and Intergovernmental Relations Subcommittee, 101st Cong, 1st Sess (June 13,1989) (Is Science for Sale? Conflicts of Interest v the Public Interest [testimony of David Blumenthal, MD]).
4. Office of Technology Assessment. New Developments in Biotechnology. Washington, DC: US Congress; 1988.
5. Abelson PH. Industrial interactions with universities. Science. 1991;252:9.
6. Etzkowitz H. Entrepreneurial science in the academy: a case of the transformation of norms. Soc Problems. 1989;36:14-29.
7. Merton RK. Science and technology in a democratic order. J Leg Polit Sci. 1942;1:15-26.
8. Krimsky S, Ennis JG, Weissman R. Academiccorporate ties in biotechnology: a quantitative study. Sci Technol Human Values. 1991;16:275-287.
9. Webster A, Etzkowitz H. Academic-Industry Relations: The Second Academic Revolution? London, England: Science Policy Support Group; 1991. Concept paper No. 12.
10. Blumenthal D, Gluck M, Louis KS, Stoto MA, Wise D. University-industry relationships in biotechnology: implications for the university. Science. 1986;232:1361-1366.
11. Kenney M. Biotechnology: The University-Industrial Complex. New Haven, Conn: Yale University Press; 1986.
12. Blumenthal D, Gluck M, Louis KS, Wise D. Industrial support of university research in biotechnology. Science. 1986;231:242-246.
13. Palca J. NSF centers rise above the storm. Science. 1991;251:19-22.
14. Marshall E. When commerce and academia collide. Science. 1990;248:152-156.
15. Chen PS. The National Institutes of Health and its interactions with industry. In: Porter RJ, Malone TE, eds. Biomedical Research: Collaboration and Conflict of Interest. Baltimore, Md: The Johns Hopkins University Press; 1992.
16. Boston Globe. BU trustees Jay Seragen tops goals. November 17, 1989;sect A:19.
17. Potential conflict foreseen for BU: trustees’ stock brought into question. Boston Globe. May 11, 1990;sect A:26.
18. Blumenthal D, Gluck M, Epstein S, Louis KS, Stoto MA. University-Industry Relationships in Biotechnology: Implications for Federal Policy: Final Report. 1987. US Dept of Health and Human Services grant 100A-83. Unpublished.
19. Gluck M, Blumenthal D, Stoto MA. University-industry relationships in the life sciences: implications for students and postdoctoral fellows. Res Policy. 1987;16:327-336.
20. Etzkowitz H. Changing academic structures and goals. Presented at the NATO Research Workshop on Academic Industry Relationships; September 2, 1991; Aquafredda, Italy.
21. Feller I. Universities as engines of R&D-based economic growth: they think they can. Res Policy. 1990;19:335-348.
22. Shapiro HT. The research university and the economy. Presented at the National Academy of Engineering Symposium: The Role of Universities in National Economic Development; December 6, 1990; Washington, DC.
23. Palci J. Conflict of interest: PHS readies new rules. Science. 1990;249:1237.
24. Shulman S. Fierce debate at Harvard. Nature. 1990;344:97.
25. Harvard University Faculty of Medicine. Faculty Policies on Integrity in Science. January 2, 1992.
26. The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine. Faculty Policies. 1990.
27. Request for Comment on Proposed Guidelines for Policies on Conflict of Interest Developed by the National Institutes of Health and The Alcohol Drug Abuse and Mental Health Administration. Washington, DC: September 15, 1989.
28. Pramik HJ. NIH redrafts its guidelines to cover conflicts of interest. Genetic Engineering News. 1990; 10:1.
29. Mervis J. NIH rebuffed, rethinks new ethics regulations. Scientist. February 5, 1990.
30. Government - University - Industry Research Roundtable. Industrial Perspectives on Innovation and Interactions With Universities. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1991.