From conceptual roles to structural relations: Bridging the syntactic cleft

Psychological Review

Volumn 99, Issue 1, 1992, Pages 150-171

  Bock, Kathryn ^a,b   Loebell, Helga ^a   Morey, Randal ^a  

^a MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONCEPT FORMATION; HUMAN; LEARNING; LINGUISTICS; PATTERN RECOGNITION; RECALL; REVIEW; SEMANTICS;

CONCEPT FORMATION; FORM PERCEPTION; HUMAN; MENTAL RECALL; PSYCHOLINGUISTICS; SEMANTICS; SUPPORT, U.S. GOV'T, NON-P.H.S.; SUPPORT, U.S. GOV'T, P.H.S.; VERBAL LEARNING;

EID: 0026462102     PISSN: 0033295X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0033-295X.99.1.150     Document Type: Article

References (73)

1. Allan, K. (1987). Hierarchies and the choice of left conjuncts (with particular attention to English). Journal of Linguistics, 23, 51-77.
2. Angiolillo, C. J., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (1982). Experimental evidence for agent-patient categories in child language. Journal of Child Language, 9, 627-643.
3. Bates, E., & Devescovi, A. (1989). Crosslinguistic studies of sentence production. In B. MacWhinney & E. Bates (Eds.), The Crosslinguistic study of sentence processing (pp. 225-253). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
4. Bates, E., & MacWhinney, B. (1982). Functionalist approaches to grammar. In E. Wanner & L. R. Gleitman (Eds.), Language acquisition: The state of the art (pp. 173-218). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
5. Bates, E., MacWhinney, B., Caselli, C., Devescovi, A., Natale, F., & Venza, V. (1984). A cross-linguistic study of the development of sentence interpretation strategies. Child Development, 55, 341-354.
6. Bates, E., McNew, S., MacWhinney, B., Devescovi, A., & Smith, S. (1982). Functional constraints on sentence processing: A cross-linguistic study. Cognition, 11, 245-299.
7. Bever, T. G., & McElree, B. (1988). Empty categories access their antecedents during comprehension. Linguistic Inquiry, 19, 35-43.
8. Bock, J. K. (1982). Toward a cognitive psychology of syntax: Informa-tion processing contributions to sentence formulation. Psychological Review, 89, 1-47.
9. Bock, J. K. (1986a). Meaning, sound, and syntax: Lexical priming in sentence production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 12, 575-586.
10. Bock, J. K. (1986b). Syntactic persistence in language production. Cognitive Psychology, 18, 355-387.
11. Bock, J. K. (1987a). Coordinating words and syntax in speech plans. In A. Ellis (Ed.), Progress in the psychology of language (pp. 337-390). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
12. Bock, J. K. (1987b). An effect of the accessibility of word forms on sentence structures. Journal of Memory and Language, 26, 119-137.
13. Bock, J. K. (1989). Closed-class immanence in sentence production. Cognition, 31, 163-186.
14. Bock, J. K., & Irwin, D. E. (1980). Syntactic effects of information availability in sentence production. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19, 467-484.
15. Bock, J. K., & Kroch, A. S. (1989). The isolability of syntactic processing. In G. N. Carlson & M. K. Tanenhaus (Eds.), Linguistic structure in language processing (pp. 157-196). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
16. Bock, J. K., & Loebell, H. (1990). Framing sentences. Cognition, 35, 1-39.
17. Bock, J. K., & Miller, C. A. (1991). Broken agreement. Cognitive Psychology, 23, 45-93.
18. Bock, J. K., & Warren, R. K. (1985). Conceptual accessibility and syntactic structure in sentence formulation. Cognition, 21, 47-67.
19. Braine, M. D. S., & Wells, R. S. (1978). Case-like categories in children: The actor and some related categories. Cognitive Psychology, 10, 100-122.
20. Bransford, J. D., Barclay, J. R., & Franks, J. J. (1972). Sentence memory: A constructive versus interpretive approach. Cognitive Psychology, 3, 193-209.
21. Bresnan, J. (1978). A realistic transformational grammar. In M. Halle, J. Bresnan, & G. A. Miller (Eds.), Linguistic theory and psychological reality (pp. 1-59). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
22. Bresnan, J. (Ed.). (1982). The mental representation of grammatical relations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
23. Bresnan, J., & Kaplan, R. M. (1984). Grammars as mental representations of language. In W. Kintsch, J. R. Miller, & P. G. Polson (Eds.), Method and tactics in cognitive science (pp. 103-135). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
24. Brown, R. (1976). Reference - In memorial tribute to Eric Lenneberg. Cognition, 4, 125-153.
25. Byrne, B., & Davidson, E. (1985). On putting the horse before the cart: Exploring conceptual bases of word order via acquisition of a miniature artificial language. Journal of Memory and Language, 24, 311-389.
26. Carey, S. (1978, November). The child's concept of animal. Paper presented at the meeting of the Psychonomic Society, San Antonio, TX.
27. Carey, S. (1983). Constraints on the meanings of natural kind terms. In T. B. Seiler & W Wannenmacher (Eds.), Concept development and the development of word meaning (pp. 126-143). New York: Springer-Verlag.
28. Carroll, J. B., & Casagrande, J. B. (1958). The function of language classifications in behavior. In E. E. Maccoby, T. M. Newcomb, & E. L. Hartley (Eds.), Readings in social psychology (pp. 18-31 ). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
29. Chafe, W L. (1970). Meaning and the structure of language. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
30. Chomsky, N. (1981). Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Foris.
31. Lapointe, S. G. (1985). A theory of verb form use in the speech of agrammatic aphasics. Brain and Language, 24, 100-155.
32. Lapointe, S. G., & Dell, G. S. (1989). A synthesis of some recent work in sentence production. In G. N. Carlson & M. K. Tanenhaus (Eds.), Linguistic structure in language processing (pp. 107-156). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
33. Lempert, H. (1984). Topic as starting point for syntax. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 49(5, Serial No. 209).
34. Lempert, H. (1988). The effect of animacy on children's noun order in verb-final sequences. Journal of Child Language, 15, 551-566.
35. Lempert, H. (1989). Animacy constraints on preschool children's acquisition of syntax. Child Development, 60, 237-245.
36. Levelt, W. J. M. (1983). Monitoring and self-repair in speech. Cognition, 14, 41-104.
37. Levelt, W. J. M. (1989). Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
38. Lindsley, J. R. (1975). Producing simple utterances: How far ahead do we plan? Cognitive Psychology, 7, 1-19.
39. Loebell, H. (1989). Syntactic aspects of bilingual language production. Unpublished master's thesis, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI.
40. Luszcz, M. A., & Bacharach, V. R.(1983). The emergence of communicative competence: Development of conversational topics. Journal of Child Language, 10, 623-638.
41. Mac Donald, M. C. (1989). Priming effects from gaps to antecedents. Language and Cognitive Processes, 4, 35-56.
42. MacKay, D. G. (1982). The problems of flexibility, fluency, and speed-accuracy trade-off in skilled behavior. Psychological Review, 89, 483-506.
43. MacWhinney, B. (1977). Starting points. Language, 53, 152-168.
44. MacWhinney, B., Bates, E., & Kliegl, R. (1984). Cue validity and sentence interpretation in English, German, and Italian. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 23, 127-150.
45. Martin, E. (1970). Toward an analysis of subjective phrase structure. Psychological Bulletin, 74, 153-166.
46. McClelland, J. L. (1987). The case for interactionism in language processing. In M. Coltheart (Ed.), Attention and performance XII: The psychology of reading (pp. 3-36). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
47. McDonald, J. L. (1986). The development of sentence comprehension strategies in English and Dutch. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 41, 317-335.
48. McDonald, J. L. (1987). Assigning linguistic roles: The influence of conflicting cues. Journal of Memory and Language, 26, 100-117.
49. McDonald, J. L., Bock, J. K., & Kelly, M. H. (1991). Word and world order: Semantic, phonological, and metrical determinants of serial position. Manuscript submitted for publication.
50. McElree, B., & Bever, T. G. (1989). The psychological reality of linguistically defined gaps. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 18, 21-36.
51. Miller, G. A. (1962). Some psychological studies of grammar. American Psychologist, 17, 748-762.
52. Miller, G. A. (1978). Semantic relations among words. In M. Halle, J. Bresnan, & G. A. Miller (Eds.), Linguistic theory and psychological reality (pp. 60-118). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
53. Osgood, C. E., & Bock, J. K. (1977). Salience and sentencing: Some production principles. In S. Rosenberg (Ed.), Sentence production: Developments in research and theory (pp. 89-140). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
54. Perlmutter, D. M. (1982). Syntactic representation, syntactic levels, and the notion of subject. In P. Jacobson & G. K. Pullum (Eds.), The nature of syntactic representation (pp. 283-340). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Reidel.
55. Pinker, S. (1979). Formal models of language learning. Cognition, 7, 217-283.
56. Pinker, S., Lebeaux, D. S., & Frost, L. A. (1987). Productivity and constraints in the acquisition of the passive. Cognition, 26, 195-267.
57. Pollard, C., & Sag, I. A. (1987). Information-based syntax and semantics. Stanford, CA: Center for the Study of Language and Information.
58. Pullum, G. K. (1977). Word order universals and grammatical relations. In P. Cole & J. M. Sadock (Eds.), Syntax and semantics 8: Grammatical relations (pp. 249-277). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
59. Radford, A. (1988). Transformational grammar. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
60. Rohrman, N. (1970). More on the recall of nominalizations. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 9, 534-536.
61. Sells, P. (1985). Lectures on contemporary syntactic theories. Stanford, CA: Center for the Study of Language and Information.
62. Shafto, M. (1973). The space for case. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 12, 551-562.
63. Shapiro, L. P., Zurif, E., & Grimshaw, J. (1987). Sentence processing and the mental representation of verbs. Cognition, 27, 219-246.
64. Slobin, D. I. (1966). Grammatical transformations and sentence comprehension in childhood and adulthood. Journal ofVerbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 5, 219-227.
65. Sommers, F. (1963). Types and ontology. Philosophical Review, 72, 327-363.
66. Sridhar, S. N. (1989). Cognitive structures in language production: A cross-linguistic study. In B. MacWhinney & E. Bates (Eds.), The cross-linguistic study of sentence processing (pp. 209-224). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
67. Steedman, M. J. (1989). Grammar, interpretation, and processing from the lexicon. In W. Marslen-Wilson (Ed.), Lexical representation and process (pp. 463-504). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
68. Stemberger, J. P. (1985). An interactive activation model of language production. In A. Ellis (Ed.), Progress in the psychology of language (pp. 143-186). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
69. Taraban, R., & McClelland, J. L. (1988). Constituent attachment and thematic role assignment in sentence processing: Influences of content-based expectations. Journal of Memory and Language, 27, 597-632.
70. Tomlin, R. S. (1986). Basic word order: Functional principles. London: Croom Helm.
71. Wasow, T. (1977). Transformations and the lexicon. In P. W. Culicover, T. Wasow, & A. Akmajian (Eds.), Formal syntax (pp. 327-360). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
72. Wilkins, W (1988). Thematic structure and reflexivization. In W. Wilkins (Ed.), Syntax and semantics. Vol. 21: Thematic relations (pp. 191-213). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
73. Williams, E. (1984). Grammatical relations. Linguistic Inquiry, 15, 639-673.