메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 256, Issue 5062, 1992, Pages 1430-1432

Small earthquakes, tectonic forces

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EARTHQUAKE; FAULT DISPLACEMENT; FORCE REDISTRIBUTION; MAGNITUDE VARIATION; SCALING;

EID: 0026457673     PISSN: 00368075     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1126/science.256.5062.1430     Document Type: Article
Times cited : (64)

References (43)
  • 2
    • 0026460813 scopus 로고
    • The phrase “small earthquakes” is used here to mean earthquakes with source radius less than one-half of the fault width; the fault width is typically 15 to 20 km in continental crust but can be 50 to 100 km in the case of major subduction zones. In terms of moment magnitude M (13), this corresponds to M ≤ 6.5 for the continental crust and M ≲ 7.5 for major subduction zones. Consistent with (5), a large earthquake will mean M ≳ 7.5.
    • (1992) Geophys. Res. Lett , vol.19 , pp. 481
    • Romanowicz, B.1
  • 21
    • 0002126364 scopus 로고
    • Seismic moment is the product of the average fault slip ū over the faulted area A times the shear modulus μ of the source region, Mo = μūA. This fundamental measure of source strength is a development more recent than Eqs. 2a and 2b, as originally formulated
    • (1966) Bull. Earthquake Res. Inst , vol.44 , pp. 73
    • Aki, K.1
  • 24
    • 85027790267 scopus 로고
    • Hanks [in (9)] derived Eq. 4a for small earthquakes (b = 1) from Eqs. 1a, 2a, and 3, although Kanamori and Anderson [in (9)], by assuming that N would scale as reciprocal faulting area (Eqs. 4a and 4b), showed that b should be equal to 1 with respect to Ms. Similarly assuming the validity of Eq. 4b, used Eqs. 1a, 1b, 2b, and 3 to derive b=1.5 for large earthquakes, which has been recently confirmed observationally (5)
    • (1989) J. Geophys. Res , vol.94 , pp. 12377
    • Rundle, J.B.1
  • 25
    • 77950806371 scopus 로고
    • Other studies that have developed Eqs. 1 through 4 to serve one purpose or another include
    • (1979) J. Geophys. Res , vol.84 , pp. 2235
    • Hanks, T.C.1
  • 30
    • 0026048897 scopus 로고
    • Readers who execute the algebra to reach Eq. 4b will note that N, ΔN ~ (lw)-1 w-1. Because w is customarily taken as a constant, this large-earthquake scaling reduces in fact to reciprocal fault-length scaling
    • (1991) J. Geophys. Res , vol.96 , pp. 6291
    • Frankel, A.1
  • 35
    • 0000667897 scopus 로고
    • Equations 1 through 4 speak to quasistatic, spatial heterogeneity with respect to earthquake occurrence. The dynamic faulting process that accompanies crustal earthquakes large and small is built from dynamic, temporal heterogeneities that are comparably well behaved
    • (1981) Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am , vol.71 , pp. 2071
    • Hanks, T.C.1    McGuire, R.K.2
  • 40
    • 0000111280 scopus 로고
    • Whether f max arises from source or site, however, has not yet been decided. Aki (3) has championed the source-effect explanation; I am inclined to the influence of recording-site phenomena
    • (1982) Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am , vol.72 , pp. 1867
    • Hanks, T.C.1


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.