Questions, Options, and Criteria: Elements of Design Space Analysis

Human�Computer Interaction

Volumn 6, Issue 3-4, 1991, Pages 201-250

  MacLean, Allan ^a   Young, Richard M ^b   Bellotti, Victoria M E ^a   Moran, Thomas P ^c  

^a Rank Xerox EuroPARC ^*  (United States)

^b MRC Applied Psychology Unit ^*  (United States)

^c PALO ALTO RESEARCH CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

SYSTEMS SCIENCE AND CYBERNETICS - MAN MACHINE SYSTEMS;

DESIGN SPACE ANALYSIS;

COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN;

EID: 0026397113     PISSN: 07370024     EISSN: 15327051     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/07370024.1991.9667168     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Adams, J. L. (1974). Conceptual blockbusting. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.
2. Alexander, C. (1964). Notes on the synthesis of form. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
3. Allison, G. T. (1971). Essence of decision: Explaining the Cuban missile crisis. Boston: Little, Brown. Apple user interface guidelines. (1987). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
4. Balzer, R., Cheatham, T. E., & Green, C. (1983). Software technology in the 1990's: Using a new paradigm. IEEE Computer, 16(11), 39-45.
5. BotteriH, J. H. (1982). The design rationale of the System/38 user interface. IBM Systems Journal, 21(4), 384-423.
6. Card, S. K., English, W. K., & Burr, B. J. (1978). Evaluation of mouse, rate-controlled isometric joystick, step keys and text keys for text selection on a CRT. Ergonomics, 21, 601-613.
7. Carroll, J. M., & Rosson, M. B. (1990). Human-computer interaction scenarios as a design representation. Proceedings of HICSS-23: 23rd Hawaii International Conference on System Science, 555-561. Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society Press.
8. Carroll, J. M., & Rosson, M. B. (1991). Deliberated evolution: Stalking the View Matcher in design space. Human-Computer Interaction, 6, 281-318. [Included in this Special Issue.
9. Conklin, J. (1987). Hypertext: An introduction and survey. IEEE Computer, 20(9), 17-41.
10. Conklin, J. (1989). Design rationale and maintainability. Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on System Sciences, 533-539. Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society Press.
11. Conklin, J., & Begeman, M. L. (1989). gIBIS: A tool for all reasons. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 40, 200-213.
12. Conklin, E. J., & Yakemovic, K. B. (1991). A process-oriented approach to design rationale. Human-Computer Interaction, 6, 357-391. [Included in this Special Issue.
13. Fischer, G., Lemke, A. C., McCall, R., & Morch, A. I. (1991). Making argumentation serve design. Human-Computer Interaction, 6, 393-419. [Included in this Special Issue.
14. Fitts, P. M. (1954). The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling amplitude of movement. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47, 381-391.
15. Goel, V., & Pirolli, P. (1989, Spring). Design within information processing theory: The design problem space. AI Magazine, pp. 18-36.
16. Grudin, J. (1988). Why CSCW applications fail: Problems in the design and evaluation of organizational interfaces. Proceedings of the CSCW ‘88 Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work, 85-93. New York: ACM.
17. Guindon, R., Krasner, H., & Curtis, B. (1987). Breakdowns and processes during the early acquisition of software design by professionals. In G. M. Olson, S. Sheppard, & E. Soloway (Eds.), Proceedings of the Second Workshop on Empirical Studies of Programmers (pp. 65-82). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
18. Halasz, F., Moran, T., & Trigg, R. (1987). NoteCards in a nutshell. Proceedings of CHI + GI ‘87: Human Factors in Computing Systems, 45-52. New York: ACM.
19. Hammond, N., Jørgensen, A. H., MacLean, A., Barnard, P., & Long, J. (1983). Design practice and interface usability: Evidence from interviews with designers. Proceedings of the CHI ‘83 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 40-44. New York: ACM.
20. Hayes, J. R. (1981). The complete problem solver. Philadelphia: Franklin Institute Press.
21. Johnson, J., & Beach, R. J. (1988). Styles in document editing systems. IEEE Computer, 21(1), 32-43.
22. Kunz, W., & Ritte], H. (1970). Issues as elements of information systems (Tech. Rep. No. S-78-2). Stuttgart: University of Stuttgart.
23. Lee, J. (1990). sibyl: A qualitative decision management system. In P. H. Winston & 5. Shellard (Eds.), Artificial intelligence at MIT: Expanding frontiers (Vol. 1, pp. 104-133). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
24. Lee, J., & Lai, K.-Y. (1991). What's in design rationale? Human-Computer Interaction, 6, 251-280. [Included in this Special Issue.
25. Lewis, C, Poison, P., Rieman, J., & Wharton, C. (1990). Testing a walkthrough methodology for theory-based design of walk-up-and-use interfaces. Proceedings of the CHI ‘90 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 235-242. New York: ACM.
26. Lewis, C, Rieman, J., & Bell, B. (1991). Problem-centered design for expressiveness and facility in a graphical programming system. Human-Computer Interaction, 6, 319-355. [Included in this Special Issue.
27. Mackay, W. (1991). Triggers and barriers to customization. Proceedings of the CHI ‘91 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 153-160. New York: ACM.
28. MacLean, A., Bellotti, V., & Young, R. M. (1990). What rationale is there in design? Proceedings of the interact ‘90 Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, 207-212. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
29. MacLean, A., Bellotti, V., Young, R., & Moran, T. (1991). Reaching through analogy: A design rationale perspective on roles of analogy. Proceedings of the CHI ‘91 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 167-172. New York: ACM.
30. MacLean, A., Carter, K., Lövstrand, L., & Moran, T. P. (1990). User-tailorable systems: Pressing the issues with Buttons. Proceedings of the CHI ‘90 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 175-182. New York: ACM.
31. MacLean, A., Young, R. M., & Moran, T. P. (1989). Design rationale: The argument behind the artifact. Proceedings of the CHI ‘89 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 247-252. New York: ACM.
32. Marshall, C. C., & Irish, P. M. (1989). Guided tours and on-line presentations: How authors can make existing hypertext intelligible for readers. Proceedings of Hypertext ‘89, 15-26. New York: ACM.
33. Martin, J. (1977). What to plan for to manage the future of your data center. Canadian Datasystems, 5(3), 28-32.
34. McCall, R. (1986). Issue-serve systems: A descriptive theory of design. Design Methods and Theories, 20(3), 443-458.
35. Moran, T. P. (1981). The command language grammar: A representation for the user interface of interactive computer systems. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 15, 3-50.
36. Newman, W. M. (1988). The representation of user interface style. In D. M. Jones & R. Winder (Eds.), People and computers IV: Designing for usability (pp. 123-144). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
37. Olson, G., & Olson, J. (1991). User centered design of collaboration technology. Journal of Organizational Computing, 1, 61-83.
38. Parnas, D., & Clements, P. C. (1986). A rational design process: How and why to fake it. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, SE-12, 251-257.
39. Payne, S. J., & Green, T. R. G. (1986). Task action grammar: A model of the mental representation of task languages. Human-Computer Interaction, 2, 93-133.
40. Polya, G. (1957). How to solve it (2nd ed.). Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
41. Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.
42. Schön, D. A. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
43. Shum, S. (1991). Cognitive dimensions of design rationale. In D. Diaper & N. V. Hammond (Eds.), People and computers VI (pp. 331-344). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
44. Simon, H. (1981). The sciences of the artificial (2nd ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
45. Smith, D. C., Irby, C, Kimball, R., & Verplank, W. (1982, April). Designing the Star user interface. Byte, pp. 242-282.
46. VanLehn, K. A. (1985). Theory reform caused by an argumentation tool (Tech. Rep. No. ISL-11). Palo Alto, CA: Xerox Palo Alto Research Center.
47. Wason, P. C. (1968). Reasoning about a rule. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 20, 273-281.