Using contextual in formation to improve land use classification of satellite images in central Spain

International Journal of Remote Sensing

Volumn 12, Issue 11, 1991, Pages 2227-2235

  Gonzalez Alonso F ^a   Lopez Soria, S ^a  

^a INIA   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

IMAGE PROCESSING--CLASSIFICATION; IMAGE PROCESSING--COLOR IMAGES; MATHEMATICAL TECHNIQUES--ALGORITHMS; PATTERN RECOGNITION--OPTIMIZATION; REMOTE SENSING--SPAIN;

CENTRAL SPAIN LAND USE MONITORING; CONTEXTUAL CLASSIFIER ALGORITHMS; PIXEL-BY-PIXEL CLASSIFICATION; SATELLITE IMAGE CLASSIFICATION; SATELLITE IMAGE CONTEXTUAL INFORMATION;

REMOTE SENSING;

CONTEXTUAL INFORMATION; LAND USE CLASSIFICATION; SATELLITE;

SPAIN;

EID: 0026359037     PISSN: 01431161     EISSN: 13665901     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01431169108955254     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Besag, J., 1986, On the statistical analysis of dirty pictures. Journal of Royal Statistics Society, B48, 259-302.
2. Gonzalez, F., Cuevas, J, and Moro, J., 1988, Aplicacion del Sistema Informático ERAF1S al reconocimiento y discriminación de los usos del suelo en la Provincia de Toledo a partir de imageries digitales MSS-Landsat 4 (Madrid: Institute Nacional de Investigaciories Agrarias).
3. Gurney, C. M., and Townshend, J R. G., 1983, The use of contextual information in the classification of remotely sensed data. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 49, 55-64.
4. Haralick, R. M., 1979, Statistical and structural approaches to texture. Proceedings of the I.E.E.E., 67, 786-804.
5. Hjort, N. L., and Mohn, E., 1984, A comparison of some contextual methods in remote sensing. Proceedings of the Eighteenth International Symposium on Remote Sensing of the Environment held ct Paris, in October 1984, (Paris: CNES), pp. 1693-1702.
6. Hjort, N. L., and Mohn, E., 1987, Topics in the statistical analysis of remotely sensed data. Bulletin of International Statistics Institute, 52, 23-47.
7. Kittler, J., and Folein, J., 1984, Contextual classification of multispectral pixel data, Image and vision computing, 2, 13-29.
8. Siegel, H. J., Swain, P. H., and Smith, B. W., 1980, Parallel processing implementations of a contextual classifier for multispectral remote sensing data. Proceedings of the 1980 Machine Processing of Remotely Sensed Data Symposium held at Purdue, in June 1980 (New York: I.E.E.E.), pp. 19-29.
9. Swain, P. H, Siegel, H., and Smith, B. W., 1979, A method for classifying multispectral remote sensing data using context. Proceedings of 1979 Machine Processing of Remotely Sensed Data Symposium held at Purdue, in June 1979 (New York: I.E.E.E.), pp. 343-353.
10. Swain, P. H, Vardeman, S. B., and Tilton, J. C, 1981, Contextual classification of multispectral image data. Pattern Recognition, 13, 429-441.
11. Wharton, S. W., 1982, A contextual classification method for recognizing land use patterns in high resolution remotely sensed data. Pattern Recognition, 15, 317-324
12. Woodcock, C. E, and Sirahler, A. H., 1987, The factor of scale in remote sensing. Remote Sensing of Environment, 21, 311-332.
13. Yu, T. S, and Fu, K. S., 1983, Recursive contextual classification using a spatial stochastic model. Pattern Recognition, 16, 89-108.