Global Field Power measurement versus classical method in the determination of the latency of evoked potential components

Brain Topography

Volumn 3, Issue 3, 1991, Pages 391-396

  Hamburger, Hans L ^a   v d Burgt, Michelle A G ^a  

^a SLOTERVAART HOSPITAL   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Classical Latency Method; Global Field Power; Multichannel recording; P300; Topography; VEP

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; EVOKED RESPONSE; EVOKED VISUAL RESPONSE; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LATENT PERIOD; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; TOPOGRAPHY;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AMPLIFIERS; ELECTRODES; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS; EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY; EVOKED POTENTIALS, VISUAL; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGE; PHOTIC STIMULATION;

EID: 0026351850     PISSN: 08960267     EISSN: 15736792     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/BF01129642     Document Type: Article

References (4)

1. Classical Method versus Global Field Power in the determination of "the latency" of evoked potentials
2. Reference-free identification of components of checkerboard-evoked multichannel potential fields
3. Spatial analysis of evoked potentials in man - a review
4. Spatial Analysis of EEG and Evoked Potential Data