Relationship between performance on lumbar dynamometry and waddell score in a population with low-back pain

Spine

Volumn 16, Issue 9, 1991, Pages 1039-1043

  Hirsch, Gabriel ^a,b   Beach, Gregg ^b   Cooke, Christopher ^b   Menard, Michael ^b,c   Locke, Shelagh ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^b The Workers' Compensation Board of British Columbia   (Canada)

^c ST PAUL S HOSPITAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

Iow back pain; Lumbar dynamometry; Psychosocial factors; Waddell score

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; LOW BACK PAIN; LUMBAR SPINE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOSOCIAL ENVIRONMENT;

ADULT; BACK PAIN; BIOMECHANICS; COHORT STUDIES; ERGOMETRY; HUMAN; LUMBAR VERTEBRAE; MALE; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; PSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; SELF CONCEPT; SICK ROLE; SUPPORT, NON-U.S. GOV'T;

EID: 0026317859     PISSN: 03622436     EISSN: 15281159     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199109000-00004     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Ahem DK, Hannon DJ, Goreczny AJ, Follick MJ, Painziale JR: Correlation of chronic low back pain behavior and muscle function examination of the flexion-relaxation response. Spine 15:92-95, 1990
2. Bandura A: Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychol Rev 84:191-215, 1979
3. Beenbon D, Monissey M: A review of the literature related to trunk muscle performance. Spine 13:655-660, 1988
4. Cooke C: Functional capacity assessment in vocational rehabilitation and its effects on the vocational placement of disabled male workers (Unpublished doctoral thesis, University of British Columbia, 1990)
5. Dvordk J, Gauchat MH, Valach L: The outcome of surgery for lumbar disc herniation: I. A 4-17 years' follow-up with emphasis on somatic aspects. Spine 13:1418-1422, 1988
6. Dvofiik J, Valach L, Fuhrimann P, Heim E: The outcome of surgery for lumbar disc herniation: II. A 4-17 years’ follow-up with emphasis on psychosocial aspects. Spine 13:1423-1427, 1988
7. Dzioba RB, Doxey NC: A prospective investigation into the orthopaedic and psychological predicators of outcome of first lumbar surgery following industrial injury. Spine 9:614-623, 1984
8. Gomez T, Beach G, Cooke C, Hrudey W, Goyert P: Normative database for trunk range of motion, strength, velocity and endurance using the Isostation B-200 Lumbar Dynamometer. Spine 16:15-21,1991
9. Hoffert MJ: The neurophysiology of pain. Neurol Clin 7:183-203, 1989
10. Kielhofner G, Burke JP: A model of human occupations, Part I: Conceptual framework and content. Am J Occup Ther 34:572-581, 1980
11. Kirkaldy-Willis WH, Hill RJ: A more precise diagnosis of low-back pain. Spine 4:102-109, 1979
12. Kirkaldy-Willis WH: Presidential Symposium on Instability of the Lumbar Spine: Introduction. Spine 10:254, 1985
13. Kishino ND, Mayer TG, Gatchel RJ, et al: Quantification of lumbar function, Part 4: Isometric and isokinetic lifting simulation in normal subjects and low back dysfunction patients. Spine 10:921-927, 1985
14. Kondraske GV: Quantitative measurement and assessment of performance. Rehabilitation Engineering. Edited by RV Smith, JH Leslie. Boca Raton, CRC Press, 1990, pp 101-125
15. Matheson LN: Work capacity evaluation. Anaheim: Evaluation and Rehabilitation Institute of California, 1987, pp III-l-III-12
16. Mayer TG, Gatchel RJ: Functional restoration for spinal disorders. The Sports Medicine Approach. Philadelphia, Lea and Febiger, Publishers, 1988
17. Mellin G: Chronic low back pain in men 54-63 years of age: Correlations of physical measurements with the degree of trouble and progress after treatment. Spine 11:421-426, 1986
18. Paminour M, Nordin M, Kahnovitz N, Frankel V: The tri-axial coupling of torque generation of trunk muscles during isometric exertions and the effect of fatiguing isoinertia. Spine 13:982-999, 1988
19. Pope MH, Wilder DG, Stokes IAF, Frymoyer JW: Biomechanical testing as an aid to decision making in low-back pain patients. Spine 4:135-140, 1979
20. Robinson JP, Shaver PR: Measures of social psychological attitudes. Michigan, Institute for Social Research, 1973, pp 84-87
21. Seeds R, Levene J, Goldberg H: Abnormal patient data for the Isostation B100. J Orthop Sports Physiother 10:121-133, 1988
22. Smidt G, Herring T, Amundsen L, et al: Assessment of abdominal and back extensor function. A quantitative approach and results for chronic low back patients. Spine 8:211-219,1983
23. SPSS Inc: SPSS/PC + Update for V3.0 and V3.1. Chap 6. Chicago, SPSS Inc., 1989, p 14
24. Suzuki N, Endo S: A quantitative study of trunk muscle strength and fatiguability in the low-back-pain syndrome. Spine 8:69-74, 1983
25. Turner JA, Herron L, Weiner P: Utility of the MMPI pain assessment index in predicting outcome after lumbar surgery. J Clin Psychol 42:764-769, 1986
26. Waddell G: A new clinical model for the treatment of low-back pain. Spine 12:632-644,1987
27. Waddell G, McCulloch JA, Kummel E, Venner RM: Nonorganic physical signs in low-back pain. Spine 5:117-125, 1980