Probit analysis of oak wilt transmission through root grafts in red oak stands

Forest Science

Volumn 37, Issue 1, 1991, Pages 28-44

  Bruhn, Johann N ^a   Pickens, James B ^a   Stanfield, David B ^a,b  

^a MICHIGAN TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Chemlawn Corp ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

Ceratocystis fagacearum; Probability of disease spread; Root graft transmission

Indexed keywords

CERATOCYSTIS FAGACEARUM; DISEASE SPREAD; GRAFT TRANSMISSION; LOGARITHMIC TRANSFORMATIONS; MODEL APPROACH; POTENTIAL SOURCES; PROBABILITY OF DISEASE; PROBIT ANALYSIS;

EPIDEMIOLOGY; PLANTS (BOTANY);

FORESTRY;

OAK WILT; PROBIT ANALYSIS; RED OAK;

USA, MICHIGAN, UPPER PENINSULA;

CERATOCYSTIS FAGACEARUM; QUERCUS;

EID: 0026309921     PISSN: 0015749X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. BECKMAN, C.H., andJ.E. KUNTZ. 1951. Translocation of poisons, dyes and radio iodine and its relation to oak wilt. Phytopathology 41:2-3.
2. BRUHN, J.N., J.B. PICKENS, and M. SUNBLADE. 1988. Oak wilt in Menominee County, Michigan. P. 72-81 in Michigan forest pest report 1987, B.A. Montgomery (ed.). MI Coop. For. Pest Manage. Prog. Annu. Rep. 88-2, Dept. Entomol., M.S.U., East Lansing.
3. Cox, D.R. 1970. The analysis of binary data. Methuen, London. 142 p.
4. FRENCH, D.W., and D.B. SCHROEDER. 1969. Oak wilt fungus, Ceratocystis fagacearum, as a selective silvicide. For. Sri. 15:198-203.
5. GARIN, G.I. 1942. Distribution of roots of certain tree species in two Connecticut soils. Conn. Agric. Exp. Stn Bull. 454.
6. GIBBS, J.N., and D.W. FRENCH. 1980. The transmission of oak wilt. USDA For. Serv. Res. Pap. NC-185. 17 p.
7. GILLESPIE, W.H., and R.P. TRUE. 1959. Three factors which influence the local spread of oak wilt in five northeastern counties of West Virginia. Plant Dis. Rep. 43:588-593.
8. GRAHAM, B.F., JR., and F.H. BORMANN. 1966. Natural root grafts. Bot. Rev. 32:255-292.
9. HAMILTON, D.A., JR. 1974. Event probabilities estimated by regression. USDA For. Serv. Res. Pap. INT-152. 18 p.
10. HAMILTON, D.A., JR., and B.M. EDWARDS. 1976. Modeling the probability of individual tree mortality. USDA For. Serv. Res. Pap. INT-185. 22 p.
11. HIMELICK, E.B., and H.W. Fox. 1961. Experimental studies on control of oak wilt disease. III. Agric. Exp. Stn. Bull. 680:48.
12. JONES, T.W. 1971. An appraisal of oak wilt control programs in Pennsylvania and West Virginia. USDA For. Serv. Res. Pap. NE-204. 15 p.
13. JONES, T.W., and A.D. PARTRIDGE. 1961. The importance of root grafts in oak wilt spread in Missouri. Plant Dis. Rep. 45:506-507.
14. JuzwiK, J. 1983. Factors affecting overland transmission of Ceratocystis fagacearum in Minnesota. Ph.D. diss., Dept, of Plant Pathology, Univ. of Minn. 96 p.
15. JUZWIK, J., D.W. FRENCH, and J. JERESEK. 1985. Overland spread of the oak wilt fungus in Minnesota. J. Arbor. 11:323-327.
16. MACDONALD, W.L., and D.F. HINDAL. 1981. Life cycle and epidemiology of Ceratocystis. P. 113-144 in Fungal wilt diseases of plants, M.E. Mace, A.E. Bell, and C.H. Beckman, (eds.). Academic Press, New York. 640 p.
17. MENGES, E.S., and O.L. LOUCKS. 1984. Modeling a diseased-caused patch disturbance: Oak wilt in the midwestem U.S. Ecology 65:487-498.
18. MENGES, E.S., and J.E. KUNTZ. 1985. Predictive equations for local spread of oak wilt in southern Wisconsin. For. Sri. 31:43-51.
19. NATIONAL COOPERATIVE SOIL SURVEY. 1982. Grayling Series. U.S. Soil Conserv. Survey. East Lansing, MI.
20. NATIONAL COOPERATIVE SOIL SURVEY. 1985. Pemene Series. U.S. Soil Conserv. Survey. East Lansing, MI.
21. OSTLE, B. 1963. Statistics in research. Ed. 2. The Iowa State Univ. Press, Ames. 585 p.
22. PARMETER, J.R., Jr., J.E. KUNTZ, and AJ. RIKER. 1956. Oak wilt development in bur oaks. Phytopathology 46:423-436.
23. PINDYCK, R., and D. RUBINFELD. 1981. Econometric models and economic forecasts. Ed. 2. McGraw-Hill, New York.
24. SEARLE, S.R. 1971. Linear models. Wiley, New York. 532 p.
25. True, R.P., ET AL. 1960. Oak wilt in West Virginia. W. Va. Agric. Exp. Stn. Bull. 448T. 119 p.