Warped space: A geography of distance decay

Professional Geographer

Volumn 43, Issue 4, 1991, Pages 500-511

  Eldridge, J Douglas ^a   Jones, John Paul ^b  

^a OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY   (United States)

Author keywords

Competing destination model; Distance decay; Expansion method; Gravity model; Migration; Spatial interaction models

Indexed keywords

DISTANCE DECAY; EXPANSION METHOD; GRAVITY MODEL; INTERACTION MODEL; SIMULATION MODEL; SPATIAL ANALYSIS; WARPED SPACE;

USA;

EID: 0026304207     PISSN: 00330124     EISSN: 14679272     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.0033-0124.1991.00500.x     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Alcaly, R. 1967. Aggregation and gravity models: Some empirical evidence. Journal of Regional Science 7:61-73.
2. Berry, B. J. L., and D. C. Dahman. 1980. Population redistribution in the United States in the 1970. In Population Redistribution and Public Policy, ed. B. J. L. Berry and L. P. Silverman, 8-49. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences.
3. Brown, L. A., and J. P. Jones. 1985. Spatial variation in migration processes and development: A Costa Rican example of conventional modeling augmented by the expansion method. Demography 22:327-52.
4. Casetti, E. 1972. Generating models by the expansion method: Applications to geographic research. Geographical Analysis 4:81-91.
5. Casetti E. 1986. The dual expansion method: An application for evaluating the effects of population growth on development. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics SMC-16:29-39.
6. Casetti, E., and A. Can. 1986. Trigonometric expansions: An application to the study of migration fields. Modeling and Simulation 17: 23-28.
7. Casetti, E., and J. P. Jones. 1987. Spatial applications of the expansion method paradigm. In Quantitative Analysis in Geography, ed. C. Dufournaud and D. Dudycha, 121-36. Waterloo Lectures in Geography, 3. Waterloo: University of Waterloo Department of Geography.
8. Eldridge, J. D. 1987. Spatial variation in distance decay parameters: An evaluation of spatial interaction models using the expansion method. M.A. Thesis, Department of Geography, University of Kentucky.
9. Fotheringham, A. S. 1983. A new set of spatial interaction models: The theory of competing destinations. Environment and Planning A 15: 15-36.
10. Fotheringham, A. S. 1984. Spatial flows and spatial patterns. Environment and Planning A16:529-43.
11. Fotheringham, A. S., and M. O'Kelly. 1989. Spatial Interaction Models: Formulations and Applications. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
12. Greenwood, M. J. 1975. Research on internal migration in the United States: A survey. Journal of Economic Literature 13:397-432.
13. Greenwood, M. J., and D. Sweetland. 1972. The determinants of migration between standard metropolitan statistical areas. Demography 9: 665-81.
14. Hägerstrand, T. 1957. Migration and area. In Migration in Sweden: A Symposium, ed. D. Han-nenberg, T. Hagerstrand, and B. Odeving, 27-158. Lund Studies in Geography, Series B, Human Geography 13. Lund: C. W. K. Gleerup.
15. Haynes, K. E., and A. S. Fotheringham. 1984. Gravity and Spatial Interaction Modeling. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
16. Huff, D. L., and G. F. Jenks. 1968. A graphic interpretation of the friction of distance in gravity models. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 58:814-24.
17. Jones, J. P. 1983. Parameter variation via the expansion method with tests for autocorrelation. Modeling and Simulation 14:853-57.
18. Jones, J. P. 1984. A spatially-varying parameter model of AFDC participation: Empirical analysis using the expansion method. The Professional Geographer 36:455-61.
19. Jones, J. P. 1992. Paradigmatic dimensions of the expansion method. In Applications of the Expansion Method, ed. J. P. Jones and E. Caset-ti, 42-62. London: Routledge.
20. Leinbach, T. R. 1973. Distance, information flows, and modernization: Some observations from west Malaysia. The Professional Geographer 25:7-11.
21. Murdie, R. A. 1965. Cultural differences in consumer travel. Economic Geography 41:211-33.
22. O’Sullivan, P. 1973. On gravity and eruptions. The Professional Geographer 29:182-85.
23. Olsson, G. 1965. Distance and Human Interaction: A Review and Bibliography. Philadelphia: Regional Science Research Institute.
24. Plane, D. A. 1984. Migration space: Doubly constrained gravity model mapping of relative interstate separation. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 74:244-56.
25. Rand McNally & Co. 1973. Standard Highway Mileage Guide. Chicago: Rand McNally & Co.
26. Roseman, C. C. 1977. Changing Migration Patterns within the United States. Association of American Geographers Resource Papers for College Geography no. 77-2. Washington, DC: Association of American Geographers.
27. Sternlieb, G., J. W. Hughes, and C. O. Hughes. 1982. Demographic Trends and Economic Reality. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Center for Urban Policy Research.
28. Taaffe, E. J. 1962. The urban hierarchy: An air passenger definition. Economic Geography 38: 1-13.
29. Tobler, W. 1970. A computer movie. Economic Geography 46:234-40.
30. US Bureau of the Census. 1972. 1970 Census of Population. Migration between State Economic Areas. Report PC(2)-2E. Washington: US Government Printing Office.
31. US Geological Survey. 1975. The United States, Scale 1:10,000,000. Reston, VA: United States Geological Survey.
32. White, S. E. 1985. Macro-level activity spaces: Some nationwide visitation patterns. The Professional Geographer 37:28-35.