The apical ectodermal ridge regulates Hox-7 and Hox-8 gene expression in developing chick limb buds

Genes and Development

Volumn 5, Issue 12 PART B, 1991, Pages 2363-2374

  Robert, Benoît ^a   Lyons, Gary ^a,b   Simandl, B Kay ^b   Kuroiwa, Atsushi ^c   Buckingham, Margaret ^a  

^a INSTITUT PASTEUR   (France)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

^c TOHOKU UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Chick developmental mutations; Ectodermal mesodermal interactions; Homeo box genes; In situ hybridization; Limb

Indexed keywords

GALLUS GALLUS; PHASIANIDAE;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ANIMAL; ARTICLE; CHICK EMBRYO; CHORISTOMA; ECTODERM; EMBRYOLOGY; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENETICS; HISTOLOGY; HOMEOBOX; LIMB; LIMB MALFORMATION; MOLECULAR GENETICS; MUTATION; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; PHYSIOLOGY; QUAIL; TRANSPLANTATION;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ANIMAL; BASE SEQUENCE; CHICK EMBRYO; CHORISTOMA; ECTODERM; EXTREMITIES; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENES, HOMEOBOX; LIMB DEFORMITIES, CONGENITAL; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; MUTATION; QUAIL; SUPPORT, NON-U.S. GOV'T; SUPPORT, U.S. GOV'T, P.H.S.;

EID: 0026267740     PISSN: 08909369     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1101/gad.5.12b.2363     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Alonso, S., A. Minty, Y. Bourlet, and M. Buckingham. 1986. Comparison of three actin-coding sequences in the mouse; evolutionary relationships between the actin genes of warm-blooded vertebrates. J. Mol. Evol. 23: 11-22.
2. Bowen, J., J.R. Hinchliffe, T.J. Horder, and A.M. Reeve. 1989. The fate map of the chick forelimb-bud and its bearing on hypothesized developmental control mechanisms. Anat. Embryol. 179: 269-283.
3. Cairns, J.M. 1975. The function of the ectodermal apical ridge and distinctive characteristics of adjacent distal mesoderm in the avian wing bud. J. Embryol. Exp. Morphol. 34: 155-169.
4. Carrington, J.L. and J.F. Fallon. 1984. The stages of flank ectoderm capable of responding to ridge induction in the chick embryo. J. Embryol. Exp. Morphol. 84: 19-34.
5. _. 1986. Experimental manipulation leading to induction of dorsal ectodermal ridges on normal limb buds results in a phenocopy of the eudiplopodia chick mutant. Dev. Biol. 116: 130-137.
6. _. 1988. Initial limb budding is independent of apical ectodermal ridge activity; evidence from a limbless mutant. Development 104: 361-367.
7. Coelho, C.N.D., L. Sumoy, B.J. Rodgers, D.R. Davidson, R.E. Hill, W.B. Upholt, and R.A. Kosher. 1991. Expression of the chicken homeobox-containing gene GHox-8 during embryonic chick limb development. Mech. Dev. 34: 143-154.
8. Davidson, D.R., A. Crawley, R.E. Hill, and C. Tickle. 1991. Position-dependent expression of two related homeo box genes in developing vertebrate limbs. Nature 352: 429-431.
9. Dhouailly, D. and M. Kieny. 1972. The capacity of the flank somatic mesoderm of early bird embryos to participate in limb development. Dev. Biol. 28: 162-175.
10. Dollé, P., J.-C. Izpisua-Belmonte, H. Falkenstein, A. Renucci, and D. Duboule. 1989. Coordinate expression of the murine Hox-5 complex homoeobox-containing genes during limb pattern formation. Nature 342: 767-772.
11. Fallon, J.F., J.M. Frederick, J.L. Carrington, M.E. Lanser, and B.K. Simandl. 1983. Studies on a limbless mutant in the chick embryo. In Limb development and regeneration (ed. J.F. Fallon and A.I. Caplan), Part A, pp. 33-43. Alan R. Liss, New York.
12. Fraser, R.A. and U.K. Abbott. 1971. Studies on limb morphogenesis VI. Experiments with early stages of the polydactylous mutant eudiplopodia. J. Exp. Zool. 176: 237-248.
13. Gavin, B.J., J.A. McMahon, and A.P. McMahon. 1990. Expression of multiple novel Wnt-1/int-1-related genes during fetal and adult mouse development. Genes & Dev. 4: 2319-2332.
14. Goetinck, P.F. 1964. Studies on limb morphogenesis II. Experiments with the polydactylous mutant eudiplopodia. Dev. Biol. 10: 71-91.
15. Hamburger, V. and H.L. Hamilton. 1951. A series of normal stages in the development of the chick embryo. J. Morphol. 88: 49-92.
16. Harrison, R.G. 1931. Experiments on the development and growth of limbs in the Amphibia. Science 74: 575-576.
17. Heine, U.I., E.F. Munoz, K.C. Flanders, L.R. Ellingsworth, H.-Y.P. Lam, N.L. Thompson, A.B. Roberts, and M.B. Sporn. 1987. Role of transforming growth factor-β in the development of the mouse embryo. J. Cell Biol. 105: 2861-2876.
18. Hill, R.E., P.E. Jones, A.R. Rees, C.M. Sime, M.J. Justice, N.G. Copeland, N.A. Jenkins, E. Graham, and D.R. Davidson. 1989. A new family of mouse homeo box-containing genes: Molecular structure, chromosomal location, and developmental expression of Hox-7.1. Genes & Dev. 3: 26-37.
19. Holland, P.W.H. 1991. Cloning and evolutionary analysis of msh-like homeobox genes from mouse, zebrafish and ascidian. Gene 98: 253-257.
20. Hurle, J.M., Y. Gañan, and D. Macias. 1989. Experimental analysis of the in vivo chondrogenic potential of the interdigital mesenchyme of the chick leg bud subjected to local ectodermal removal. Dev. Biol. 132: 368-374.
21. Jones, C.M., K.M. Lyons, and B.L.M. Hogan. 1991. Involvement of Bone Morphogenetic Protein-4 (BMP-4) and Vgr-1 in morphogenesis and neurogenesis in the mouse. Development 111: 531-542.
22. Kessel, M. and P. Gruss. 1990. Murine developmental control genes. Science 249: 374-379.
23. Kieny, M. 1960. Rôle inducteur du mésoderme dans la différenciation précoce du bourgeon de membre chez l'embryon de poulet. J. Embryol. Exp. Morphol. 8: 457-467.
24. Krabbenhoft, K.M. and J.F. Fallon. 1989. The formation of legand wing- specific structures by leg bud cells grafted to the wing bud is influenced by proximity to the apical ridge. Dev. Biol. 131: 373-382.
25. Le Douarin, N. 1969. Particularités du noyau interphasique chez la caille japonaise (Colurnix colurnix japonica). Utilisation de ces particularités comme "marquage biologique" dans les recherches sur les interactions tissulaires et les migrations cellulaires au cours de l'ontogenèse. Bull. Biol. Fr. Belg. 103: 435-452.
26. Lyons, K.M., R.W. Pelton, and B.L.M. Hogan. 1990a. Organogenesis and pattern formation in the mouse: RNA distribution patterns suggest a role for Bone Morphogenetic Protein 2-A (BMP-2A). Development 109: 833-844.
27. Lyons, G.E., M. Ontell, R. Cox, D. Sassoon, and M. Buckingham. 1990b. The expression of myosin genes in developing skeletal muscle in the mouse embryo. J. Cell Biol. 111: 1465-1476.
28. Monaghan, A.P., D.D. Davidson, C. Sime, E. Graham, R. Baldock, S.S. Bhattacharya, and R.E. Hill. 1991. The msh-like homeo box genes define domains in the developing eye. Development 112: 1053-1061.
29. Prahlad, K.V., G. Skala, D.G. Jones, and W. Briles. 1979. Limbless: A new genetic mutant in the chick. J. Exp. Zool. 209: 427-434.
30. Robert, B., D. Sassoon, B. Jacq, W. Gehring, and M. Buckingham. 1989. Hox-7, a mouse homeo box gene with a novel pattern of expression during embryogenesis. EMBO J. 8: 91-100.
31. Rowe, D.A. and J.F. Fallon. 1982. The proximodistal determination of skeletal parts in the developing chick leg. J. Embryol. Exp. Morphol. 68: 1-7.
32. Rowe, D.A., J.A. Cairns, and J.F. Fallon. 1982. Spatial and temporal patterns of cell death in limb bud mesoderm after apical ridge removal. Dev. Biol. 93: 83-91.
33. Saunders, J.W., Jr. 1948. The proximo-distal sequence of origin of the parts of the chick wing and the role of the ectoderm. J. Exp. Zool. 108: 363-403.
34. _. 1977. The experimental analysis of chick limb bud development. In Vertebrate limb and somite morphogenesis (ed. D. A. Ede, J.R. Hinchliffe, and M. Balls), pp. 1-24. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England.
35. Saunders, J.W. Jr. and M.T. Gasseling. 1968. Ectodermal-mesodermal interactions in the origin of limb symmetry. In Epithelial-mesenchymal interactions (ed. R. Fleischmajer and R.E. Billingham), pp. 78-97. Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore, MD.
36. Saunders, J.W. Jr. and C. Reuss. 1974. Inductive and axial properties of prospective wing-bud mesoderm in the chick embryo. Dev. Biol. 38: 41-50.
37. Saunders, J.W. Jr., M.T. Gasseling, and J.E. Errick. 1976. Inductive activity and enduring cellular constitution of a super-numerary apical ectodermal ridge grafted to the limb bud of the chick embryo. Dev. Biol. 50: 16-25.
38. Stark, R.J. and R.L. Searls. 1973. A description of chick wing bud development and a model of limb morphogenesis. Dev. Biol. 33: 138-153.
39. Su, M.-W., H.R. Suzuki, M. Solursh, and F. Ramirez. 1991. Progressively restricted expression of a new homeo box-containing gene during Xenopus laevis embryogenesis. Development 111: 1179-1187.
40. Summerbell, D. 1974. A quantitative analysis of the effect of excision of the AER from the chick limb-bud. J. Embryol. Exp. Morphol. 32: 651-660.
41. Summerbell, D., J.H. Lewis, and L. Wolpert. 1973. Positional information in chick limb morphogenesis. Nature 244: 492-496.
42. Takahashi, Y. and N. Le Douarin. 1990. cDNA cloning of a quail homeo box gene and its expression in neural crest-derived mesenchyme and lateral plate mesoderm. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 87: 7482-7486.
43. Takahashi, Y., M. Bontoux, and N.M. Le Douarin. 1991. Epithelio-mesenchymal interactions are critical for Quox 7 expression and membrane bone differentiation in the neural crest derived mandibular mesenchyme. EMBO J. 10: 2387-2393.
44. Tickle, C., D. Summerbell, and L. Wolpert. 1975. Positional signaling and specification of digits in chick limb morphogenesis. Nature 254: 199-202.
45. Tickle, C., B. Alberts, L. Wolpert, and L. Lee. 1982. Local application of retinoic acid to the limb bud mimics the action of the polarizing region. Nature 296: 564-566.
46. Tschumi, P.A. 1957. The growth of the hindlimb bud of Xenopus laevis and its dependence upon the epidermis. J. Anat.. 91: 149-173.
47. Yokouchi, Y., K. Ohsugi, H. Sasaki, and A. Kuroiwa. 1991. Chicken homeobox gene Msn-1: structure, expression in limb buds and effect of retinoic acid. Development 113: 431-444.
48. Zwilling, E. 1956. Interaction between limb bud ectoderm and mesoderm in the chick embryo. II-Experimental limb duplication. J. Exp. Zool. 132: 173-186.
49. Zwilling, E. 1961. Limb morphogenesis. Adv. Morphogenet. 1: 301-330.