The validity of academic learning time-physical education (Alt-pe) as a process measure of achievement

Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport

Volumn 62, Issue 3, 1991, Pages 319-325

  Silverman, Stephen ^a   Devillier, Rachel ^a   Ramirez, Teresita ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

Author keywords

ALT PE; Process outcome; Student engagement; Validity

Indexed keywords

ACHIEVEMENT; ARTICLE; FACTUAL DATABASE; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; LEARNING; PHYSICAL EDUCATION; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STUDENT; TASK PERFORMANCE;

ACHIEVEMENT; DATA COLLECTION; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; DATABASES, FACTUAL; HUMAN; LEARNING; PHYSICAL EDUCATION AND TRAINING; STUDENTS; TIME AND MOTION STUDIES;

EID: 0026228948     PISSN: 02701367     EISSN: 21683824     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02701367.1991.10608729     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. AAHPERD. (1965). Volleyball skills test manual. Reston, VA: American Alliance for Health, Physical Education, Recreation and Dance.
2. Borich, G., Sc Klinzing, G. (1984). Some assumptions in the observation of classroom process with suggestions for improving low inference measurement. Journal of Classroom Interaction, 20(1), 36-44.
3. Brophy, J. E., Good, T. L. (1986). Teacher behavior and student achievement. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed.). New York: Macmillan.
4. Carlisle, C. S. (1982). An analysis of the relationship between teacher process variables, selected skill learning time variables, and student achievement in physical education classes, grades five through eight. Dissertation Abstracts International, 42, 4783A. (University Microfilms No. 8209, 806)
5. Cousineau, W. J., Luke, M. D. (1990). Relationships between teacher expectations and academic learning time in sixth grade physical education basketball classes. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 9, 262-271.
6. Cronbach, L. J., Furby, L. (1970). How should we measure “change”—or should we? Psychological Bulletin, 74, 68-80.
7. Dodds, P., Rife, F. (Eds.). (1983). Time to learn in physical education: History, completed research, and potential future for academic learning time in physical education. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, Monograph 1.
8. Dodds, P., Rife, F., Metzler, M. (1982). Academic learning time in physical education: Data collection, completed research and future directions. In M. Pieron J. Cheffers (Eds.), Studying the teachingin physical education. Liege: International Association for Physical Education in Higher Education.
9. Doyle, W. (1978, April). Research on the realities of the classroom: Who needs U?Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Toronto.
10. Dunkin, M. J., Biddle, B. J. (1974). The study of leaching. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
11. Evertson, C. M., Green, J. L. (1986). Observation as inquiry and method. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed.). New York: Macmillan.
12. Fisher, C. W., Filby, N. N., Marliave, R., Cahen, L., Dishaw, M. M., Moore, J. E., Berliner, D. C. (1978). Teaching behaviors, academic learning time, and student achievement: Final report of phase III-B, beginning teacher evaluation study. San Francisco: Far West Regional Laboratory for Educational Research and Development.
13. Frechtling, J. A. (1983, April). Problems in evaluating school effectiveness: A shopping list of dilemmas. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal.
14. Gage, N. L. (1985). Hard gains in the soft sciences: The case of pedagogy. Bloomington, IN: Phi Delta Kappan.
15. Gage, N. L., Needles, M. C. (1989). Process-product research on teaching: A review of criticisms. Elementary School Journal, 89, 253-300.
16. Godbout, P., Brunelle, J., Tousignant, M. (1983). Academic learning time in elementary and secondary physical education classes. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 57, 11-19.