Why (some) Americans believe in the lie detector while others believe in the guilty knowledge test

Integrative Physiological and Behavioral Science

Volumn 26, Issue 3, 1991, Pages 214-222

  Lykken, David T ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AROUSAL; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE; DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS; FORENSIC MEDICINE; GUILT; HOMICIDE; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; LEGAL ASPECT; MONITORING; REPRODUCIBILITY;

AROUSAL; ATTITUDE; DIAGNOSIS, DIFFERENTIAL; GUILT; HOMICIDE; HUMAN; LIE DETECTION; MONITORING, PHYSIOLOGIC; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; TRUTH DISCLOSURE;

EID: 0026194981     PISSN: 1053881X     EISSN: 19363567     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/BF02912513     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Effects of repeated examinations on the ability to detect guilt with a polygraphic examination: A laboratory experiment with a real crime
2. Innocence, information, and the guilty knowledge test in the detection of deception
3. “They’ll let me go tomorrow”: The Fay case
4. Validity of the guilty-knowledge technique: The effects of motivation
5. Guilty knowledge versus innocent associations: Effects of trait anxiety and stimulus context on skin conductance
6. The effect of selected variables on interpretation of polygraph records
7. Effects of diazepam and methylphenidate on the electrodermal detection of guilty knowledge
8. What psychologists should know about lie detection
9. Polygraph techniques
10. A field study of the fallibility of polygraphic lie detection
11. The GSR in the detection of guilt
12. The law and the lie detector
13. The case against polygraphy
14. The American polygraph as the party affirming legal and social justice
15. Movement recording chairs: A necessity?
16. Effectiveness of techniques and physiological measures in the detection of deception
17. Effect of feedback of physiological information on responses to innocent associations and guilty knowledge