Closed-Form Solutions for Physically Based Shape Modeling and Recognition

IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence

Volumn 13, Issue 7, 1991, Pages 715-729

  Pentland, Alex ^a   Sclaroff, Stan ^a  

^a MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

3 D shape recovery; analysis; deformable models; finite element method; modal based vision; model; object recognition; physically based modeling; shape representation

Indexed keywords

IMAGE PROCESSING - IMAGE ANALYSIS; MATHEMATICAL TECHNIQUES - FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; OPTICS - MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PATTERN RECOGNITION;

OBJECT RECOGNITION; PARAMETRIC MODELING; SHAPE MODELING; SHAPE RECOGNITION; SOLID MODELING;

COMPUTER VISION;

EID: 0026189440     PISSN: 01628828     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1109/34.85660     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. T. Binford, “Visual perception by computer,” presented at the IEEE conference on Systems and Control, Dec. 1971.
2. D. Marr and K. Nishihara, “Representation and recognition of the spatial organization of three-dimensional shapes,” in Proc. of the Royal Society-London B, 1978.
3. R. Mohan and R. Nevatia, “Using perceptual organization to extract 3D structures,” IEEE Trans. Patt. Anal. Mach. Inteli, vol. 11, no. 11, pp. 1121–1139, Nov. 1989.
4. A. Pentland, “Perceptual organization and representation of natural form,” Artificial IntelI, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 293–331, 1986.
5. A. Pentland, “Recognition by parts,” in Proc. First International Conf. Comput. Vision, (London, England), 1987, pp. 612–620.
6. F. Solina and R. Bajcsy, “Recovery of parametric models from range images: The case for superquadrics with global deformations,” IEEE Trans. Patt. Anal. Mach. Inteli., vol. 12, no. 2, 131–147, 1990.
7. T. Boult and A. Gross, “Recovery of superquadrics from depth information,” in Proc. of the AAAI Workshop on Spatial Reasoning and Multi-Sensor Fusion, Oct. 1987, 128–137.
8. I. Biederman, “Recognition-by-components: A theory of human image understanding,” Psychological Rev., vol. 94, no. 2, pp. 115–147, 1987.
9. P. Winston, T. Binford, B. Katz, and M. Lowry, “Learning physical description from functional descriptions, examples, and precedents,” in Proc. of AAAI, 1983, pp. 433–439.
10. D. Terzopoulos, A. Witkin, and M. Kass, “Symmetry-seeking models for 3-D object reconstruction,” Int.J. Comput. Vision, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 211–221, 1987.
11. A. Pentland, “Automatic extraction of deformable part models,” International J. Comput. Vision, pp. 107–126, 1990.
12. A. Pentland and J. Williams, “Good vibrations: Modal dynamics for graphics and animation,” Comput. Graphics, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 215–222, 1989.
13. M. Leyton, “Perceptual organization as nested control,” Biological Cybernetics, vol. 51, pp. 141–153, 1984.
14. D. Hoffman and W. Richards, “Parts of recognition,” in From Pixels to Predicates (A. Pentland, Ed.). Norwood, NJ: Ablex, 1985.
15. K. Bathe, Finite Element Procedures in Engineering Analysis. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1982.
16. A. Pentland, I. Essa, M. Freidmann, B. Horowitz, and S. Sclaroff, “The thingworld modeling system: Virtual sculpting by modal forces,” Comput. Graphics, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 143–144, 1990.
17. T. Darrell, S. Sclaroff, and A. Pentland, “Segmentation by minimal description,” in Proc. Third International Conf Comput. Vision, Dec. 1990.
18. L. Segerlind, Applied Finite Element Analysis. New York: Wiley, 1984.
19. I. Essa, “Contact Detection, Collision Forces, and Friction for Physically-Based Virtual World Modeling,” M.A. thesis, Dept. of Civil Engineering, M.I.T., 1990.