The Minimum Distance for Digital Magnetic Recording Partial Responses

IEEE Transactions on Information Theory

Volumn 37, Issue 3, 1991, Pages 955-960

  Vannucci, G ^a   Foschini, G J ^a  

^a LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES   (United States)

Author keywords

magnetic recording; minimum distance; optimum detection; partial responses; Viterbi algorithm

Indexed keywords

CODES, SYMBOLIC; DATA TRANSMISSION; INFORMATION THEORY - COMMUNICATION CHANNELS; SIGNAL PROCESSING - SIGNAL ENCODING; TELECOMMUNICATION CABLES, COAXIAL;

COAXIAL CABLE PARTIAL RESPONSES; DIGITAL MAGNETIC RECORDING CHANNEL; MAGNETIC RECORDING; MINIMUM-DISTANCE PROBLEM; OPTIMUM DETECTION; VITERBI ALGORITHM;

DATA STORAGE, MAGNETIC;

EID: 0026151454     PISSN: 00189448     EISSN: 15579654     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1109/18.79968     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. H. K. Thapar and A. M. Patel, “A class of partial response systems for increasing storage density in magnetic recording,” IEEE Trans. Magn., vol. MAG-23, no. 5, pp. 3666–3668, Sept. 1987.
2. G. J. Foschini, “Maximally null partial response for an MLSE digital data system involving high-loss coaxial cable,” IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory, vol. IT-21, no. 6, pp. 601–604, Nov. 1975.
3. H. Kobayashi and D. T. Tang, “Application of partial-response channel coding to magnetic recording systems,” IBM J. Res. Develop., vol. NI-14, no. 7, pp. 368–375, July 1970.
4. S. Nakagawa, K. Yokoyama, and H. Katayama, “A study on detection methods of NRZ recording,” IEEE Trans. Magn., vol. MAG-16, no. 1, pp. 104–110, Jan. 1980.
5. J. M. Cioffi and C. M. Melas, “Evaluating the performance of maximum likelihood sequence detection in a magnetic recording channel,” in Proc. GLOBECOM '86, Houston, TX, 1986, pp. 1066–1070.
6. R. Wood, S. Ahlgrim, K. Hallamasek, and R. Stenerson, “An experimental eight-inch disc drive with one-hundred megabytes per surface,” IEEE Trans. Magn., vol. MAG-20, no. 5, pp. 698–702, Sept. 1984.
7. G. J. Foschini, “Contrasting performance of faster binary signaling with QAM,” AT&T Bell Lab. Tech. J., vol. 63, no. 8, Oct. 1984.
8. S. Fredricsson, “Optimum transmitting filter in digital PAM systems with a Viterbi detector,” IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory, vol. IT-20, no. 4, pp. 479–489, July 1974.
9. D. G. Messerschmitt, “Design of a finite impulse response for the Viterbi algorithm and decision-feedback equalizer,” in Proc. Int. Commun. Conf., pp. 37D-1-37D-5, June 1974.
10. R. R. Anderson and G. J. Foschini, “The minimum distance for MLSE digital data systems of limited complexity,” IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory, vol. IT-21, no. 5, Sept. 1975.
11. R. Price, J. W. Craig, H. E. Melbye, and A. Perahia, “An experimental multilevel, high-density disk recording system,” IEEE Trans. Magn., vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 315–317, Sept. 1978.
12. D. C. Larson, J. Ashley, and T. D. Howell, “On the minimum length error event of minimum Euclidean weight,” IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory, vol. 34, no. 5, pp. 1074–1076, Sept. 1988.
13. G. D. Forney, Jr., “Maximum-likelihood sequence estimation of digital sequences in the presence of intersymbol interference,” IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory, vol. IT-18, no. 3, pp. 363–378, May 1972.
14. G. J. Foschini, “Performance bound for maximum likelihood reception of digital data,” IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory, vol. IT-21, no. 1, pp. 47–50, Jan. 1975.