Can valid inferences be suppressed?

Cognition

Volumn 39, Issue 1, 1991, Pages 71-78

  Byrne, Ruth M J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE DUBLIN   (Ireland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTENTION; CONCEPT FORMATION; HUMAN; LINGUISTICS; LOGIC; PROBLEM SOLVING; SEMANTICS;

ATTENTION; CONCEPT FORMATION; HUMAN; LOGIC; PROBLEM SOLVING; PSYCHOLINGUISTICS; SEMANTICS;

EID: 0026147722     PISSN: 00100277     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/0010-0277(91)90060-H     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. On the relation between the natural logic of reasoning and standard logic
2. Some empirical justification for a theory of natural propositional logic
3. The contextual nature of conditional reasoning
4. Suppressing valid inferences with conditionals
5. Everyday reasoning with conditional sequences
6. Spatial reasoning
7. On the relation between logic and thinking
8. Common-sense inference
9. Only reasoning
10. Meta-logical reasoning: Knights, knaves, and Rips
11. Reasoning by model: The case of multiple quantification
12. Awareness of the “possible” as a mediator of formal thinking in conditional reasoning problems
13. Incorrect conditional reasoning among adults Competence or performance?
14. Logic and models of logical thinking
15. Non-logical solving of categorial syllogisms
16. Responses to inconsistent premises cannot count as suppression of valid inferences
17. Cognitive processes in propositional reasoning
18. Conversational comprehension processes are responsible for reasoning fallacies in children as well as adults: IF is not the biconditional