Practical implications of cochlear implants in children

Ear and Hearing

Volumn 12, Issue , 1991, Pages 81S-89S

  Boothroyd, Arthur ^a   Geers, Ann E ^b   Moog, Jean S ^b  

^a CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

^b CENTRAL INSTITUTE FOR THE DEAF   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CHILD; COCHLEA PROSTHESIS; HEARING IMPAIRMENT; HUMAN; IMPLANT; LANGUAGE DEVELOPMENT;

ADOLESCENT; AUDITORY PERCEPTION; CHILD; CHILD LANGUAGE; COCHLEAR IMPLANTS; DEAFNESS; HUMAN; SPEECH PERCEPTION; SUPPORT, U.S. GOV'T, P.H.S.;

EID: 0026072081     PISSN: 01960202     EISSN: 15384667     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00003446-199108001-00010     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Bess FH., Freeman BA., and Sinclair JS. Eds. Amplification in Education. Washington, D.C.: Alexander Graham Bell Association for the Deaf, 1981.
2. Boothroyd A. Auditory perception of speech contrasts by subjects with sensorineural hearing loss. J Speech Hear Res 1984;27:134-144.
3. Boothroyd A. Auditory capacity and the generalization of speech skills. In Lauter J. Ed. Speech planning and production in normal and hearing-impaired children. ASHA Reports 1985:15:8-14.
4. Boothroyd A. Hearing Impairments in Young Children. Washington. D.C.: Alexander Graham Bell Association for the Deaf. 1988.
5. Boothroyd A., and Cawkwell S. Vibrotactile thresholds in pure tone audiometry. Acta Otolaryngol 1970:69:381-387. Also in: Chaiklin JB. Ventr-y IM. and Dixon RF. Hearing Measurement: A Book of Readings. 2nd ed. Reading: MA. Addison Wesley. 1982:134-139.
6. Davis H and Silverman R. Hearing and Deafness. New York: Holt Reinhart. and Winston. 1978.
7. Erber NP. Vibratory perception by deaf children. Int J Rehabil Res 1978;1:27-37.
8. Erber NP. Vibratory perception by deaf children. Int J Rehabil Res Erber NP. Speech perception by profoundly hearing-impaired children J Speech Hear Disordei 1979:44:255-270.
9. Erber NP and Alencewicz CM. Audiologic evaluation of deaf children. J Speech Hear Disord 1976:41:256-267.
10. Geers AE and Moog JS. Predicting long-term benefits of cochlear implants in profoundly hearingimpaired children. Am J Otol 1988:9:169-176.
11. Geers AE and Moog JS. Evaluating the benefits of cochlear implants in an education setting. Am J Otol 1991;12(Suppl):116-125.
12. Ling D and Ling A. Aural Habilitation. Washington D.C.: Alexander Graham Bell Association for the Deaf, 1978.
13. Ling D and Milne M. The development ofspeech in hearing-impaired children. In Bess FH. Freeman BA, and Sinclair JS. Eds. Amplification in Education. Washington. D.C.: Alexander Graham Bell Association for the Deaf. 1981.
14. Magner M. A. Speech Intelligibility Test for Deaf Children. Northampton. MA: Clarke School for the Deaf. 1972.
15. Moog JS. The CID Phonetic Inventory. St. Louis. MO: Central Institute for the Deaf, 1989.
16. Nober EH. Vibrotactile sensitivity of deaf children to high intensity sound. Laryngoscope 1967:77:2128-2146.
17. Ross M., and Giolas TG. Auditory Management of Hearing-Impaired Children. Baltimore. MD: University Park Press. 1978.
18. Somers MN. Comparing auditory abilities in children with cochlear implants and children with hearing aids. Am J Otol 1991;12(Supp1)174-179.