Absolute cross-sectional area measurements in quantitative coronary arteriography by dual-energy DSA

Investigative Radiology

Volumn 26, Issue 2, 1991, Pages 119-127

  Molloi, Sabee Y ^a   Ersahin, Atila ^a   Roeck, Werner W ^a   Nalcioglu, Orhan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Digital subtraction angiography; Energy subtraction; Quantitative arteriography

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CORONARY ARTERY OBSTRUCTION; DIGITAL SUBTRACTION ANGIOGRAPHY; PHANTOM; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE DIAGNOSIS; VIDEODENSITOMETRY;

ALGORITHMS; ANGIOGRAPHY, DIGITAL SUBTRACTION; ANIMAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONSTRICTION, PATHOLOGIC; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; HUMAN; MODELS, STRUCTURAL; SUPPORT, U.S. GOV'T, P.H.S.; SWINE;

EID: 0026030733     PISSN: 00209996     EISSN: 15360210     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00004424-199102000-00005     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Detrc KM, Wright E, Murphy ML, Takaro T. Observer agreement in evaluating coronary angiograms. Circulation 1975;52:979-986.
2. Zir LM, Miller SW, Dinsmore RE, Gilbert JP, Hawthorne JW. Interobserver variability in coronary angiography. Circulation 1976;53:627.
3. Fisher LO, Judkins MP, Lesperancc J, et al. Reproducibility of coronary angiographic reading in the coronary artery surgery study (CASS). Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1982;8:565-575.
4. Robbins SL, Rodriquez FL, Wragy AL, Fish SJ. Problems in quantitation of coronary atherosclerosis. Am J Cardiol 1966; 18:153-159.
5. Grondin CM, Dyrda I, Pastemac A, Campeau L, Bourassa MG, Les- perance J. Discrepancies between cineangiographic and postmortem findings in patients with coronary artery disease and recent myocardial revascularization. Circulation 1974;49:703-708.
6. Vlodaver OZ, French R, Van Tassel RA, Edwards JE. Correlation of the antemortem coronary angiogram and the postmortem specimen. Circulation 1973;47:162-169.
7. Thomas AC, Davies MJ, Dilly S, Dilly N, Franc F. Potential errors in the estimation of coronary arterial stenosis from clinical arteriography with reference to the shape of the coronary arterial lumen. Br Heart J 1986;55:129-139.
8. Brown BG, Bolson E, Frimcr M, Dodge HT. Quantitative coronary arteriography. Circulation 1977;55:329-337.
9. Spears JR, Sandor DP, Als A, et al. Computerized image analysis for quantitative measurement of vessel diameter from cineangiograms. Circulation 1983;68:453-461.
10. Reiber JHC, Kooijman CJ, Slager CJ, et al. Coronary artery dimensions from cineangiograms: methodology and validation of a computer-assisted analysis procedure. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 1984;MI-3:131-140.
11. Kirkceide RL, Fung P, Smalling RW, Gould KL. Automated evaluation of vessel diameter from arteriograms, Computers in Cardiology, Proceedings of IEEE, 1982;215.
12. Mancini GBJ, Simon SB, McGillcn MJ, LeFree MT, Freidman HZ, Vogel RA. Automated quantitative coronary arteriography: morphologic and physiologic validation in vivo of a rapid digital angiographic method. Circulation 1987;75:452-460.
13. Roeck WW, Nalcioglu O, Seibert JA. A hybrid system for high resolution digital video densitometry. Soc Photo-Opt Instrum Eng 1981;314:92-100.
14. Nalcioglu O, Roeck WW, Seibert JA, Lando AV, Tobis JM, Henry WL. Quantitative aspects of image intensifier-television based digital x-ray imaging. In: Kerciakes J, Thomas SR, Orton EG, eds. Digital radiography: selected topics. New York: Plenum, 1986;83- 132.
15. Seibert JA, Nalcioglu O, Roeck WW. Removal of image intensifier veiling glare by mathematical deconvolution techniques. Med Phys 1985;12:281-288.
16. Kruger RA. Estimation of the diameter and the iodine concentrationwithin blood vessels using digital radiography devices. Med Phys 1981;8:652-658.
17. Houk TL, Kruger RA, Mistretta CA, Riederer SJ, Lancaster JC. Realtime digital K-edge subtraction fluoroscopy. Invest Radiol 1979;14:270-278.
18. Molloi SY, Mistretta CA. Quantification techniques for dual-energy cardiac imaging. Med Phys 1989;16:209-217.
19. Molloi SY, Weber DM, Peppier WW, Folts JD, Mistretta CA. Quantitative dual energy coronary arteriography. Invest Radiol 1990;25:908-914.
20. Simons MA, Kruger RA. Vessel diameter measurement using digital subtraction radiography. Invest Radiol 1985;20:510-516.
21. Simons MA, Kruger RA, Power RL. Cross-sectional area measurements by digital subtraction videodensitometry. Invest Radiol 1986;21:637-644.
22. Molloi SY. Dynamic dual-energy X-ray techniques for cardiac imaging. Doctoral thesis, University of Wisconsin, Madison, 1987;8-50.
23. Molloi SY, Mistretta CA. Scatter-glare corrections in quantitative dual-energy fluoroscopy. Med Phys 1988;15:289-297.
24. Gardiner GA, Meyerovitz MF, Boxt LM, et al. Selective coronary angiography using a power injector. AJR 1986;146:831-833.
25. Bursch JH, Heintzen PH. Concepts for coronary flow and myocardial perfusion measurements. In: Heintzen PH, Bursch JH, eds. Progress in digital angiocardiography. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1988;201-213.
26. Hangiandreou NJ. Coronary blood flow measurement using digital subtraction angiography and first pass distribution analysis. Doctoral thesis, University of Wisconsin, Madison, 1990;22-57.
27. Bevington PR. Data reduction and error analysis for the physical sciences. New York: McGraw Hill, 1969:187-203.
28. Fujita H, Doi K, Fcncil LE, Chua KG. Image feature analysis and computer-aided diagnosis in digital radiography. 2. Computerized determination of vessel sizes in digital subtraction angiography. Med Phys 1987;14:549-556.
29. Fencil LE, Doi K, Hoffman KR. Accurate analysis of blood vessel sizes and stenotic lesions using stereoscopic DSA system. Invest Radiol 1988;23:33-41.
30. Weber DM. Absolute diameter measurements of coronary arteries based on the first zero crossing of the fourier spectrum. Med Phys 1989;16:188-196.
31. Fedele FA, Sharaf B, Most AS, Gewitz H. Details of coronary stenosis morphology influence its hemodynamic severity and distal flow reserve. Circulation 1989;80:636-642.
32. Spears JR, Sanda T, Bairn DSW, Paulin S. The minimum error in estimating coronary luminal cross-sectional area from cineangio- graphic diameter measurements. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1983;9:119-128.