Ovarian lesions: Detection and characterization with gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging at 1.5 T

Radiology

Volumn 181, Issue 2, 1991, Pages 481-488

  Stevens, Susan K ^a   Hricak, Hedvig ^a   Stern, Jeffrey L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Gadolinium; Magnetic resonance (MR), comparative studies magnetic resonance (MR), contrast enhancement; Ovary, cysts, 852.31; Ovary, MR studies, 852.1214; Ovary, neoplasms, 852.32, 852.33

Indexed keywords

GADOLINIUM PENTETATE;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CANCER STAGING; CLINICAL ARTICLE; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTRAVENOUS DRUG ADMINISTRATION; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; OVARY CANCER; OVARY CYST; OVARY TUMOR; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CONTRAST MEDIA; DRUG COMBINATIONS; FEMALE; GADOLINIUM; GADOLINIUM DTPA; HUMAN; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MEGLUMINE; MIDDLE AGE; NEOPLASM STAGING; ORGANOMETALLIC COMPOUNDS; OVARIAN DISEASES; OVARIAN NEOPLASMS; OVARY; PENTETIC ACID;

EID: 0025955455     PISSN: 00338419     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiology.181.2.1924792     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Thurnher S, Hodler J, Baer S, Marincek B, von Schulthess GK. Gadolinium-DOTA enhanced MR imaging of adnexal tumors. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1990; 14:939-949.
2. Smith FW, Cherryman GR, Bayliss AP, et al. Comparative study of the accuracy of ultrasound imaging, x-ray computerized tomography and low field MRI diagnosis of ovarian malignancy. Magn Reson Imaging 1988; 6:225-227.
3. Mawhinney RR, Powell MC, Worthington BS, Symonds EM. Magnetic resonance imaging of benign ovarian masses. Br J Radiol 1988; 61:179-186.
4. Togashi K, Nishimura K, Itoh K, et al. Ovarian cystic teratomas: MR imaging. Radiology 1987; 162:669-673.
5. Mitchell DG, Mintz MC, Spritzer CE, et al. Adnexal masses: MR imaging observations at 1.5 T, with US and CT correlation. Radiology 1987; 162:319-324.
6. Hamlin DJ, Fitzsimmons JR, Pettersson H, Riggal FC, Morgan L, Wilkinson EJ. Magnetic resonance imaging of the pelvis: evaluation of ovarian masses at 0.15T. AJR 1985; 145:585-590.
7. Bies JR, Ellis JH, Kopecky KK, et al. Assessment of primary gynecologic malignancies: comparison of 0.15-T resistive MRI with CT. AJR 1984; 143:1249-1257.
8. Nishimura K, Togashi K, Itoh K, et al. Endometrial cysts of the ovary: MR imaging. Radiology 1987; 162:315-318.
9. Nyberg DA, Porter BA, Olds MO, Olson D, Anderson R, Wesby GE. MR imaging of hemorrhagic adnexal masses. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1987; 11:664-669.
10. Dooms GC, Hricak H, Tscholakoff D. Adnexal structures: MR imaging. Radiology 1986; 158:639-646.
11. Morrow CP, Townsend DE. Tumors of the ovary: general considerations, classification, the adnexal mass. In: Morrow CP, Townsend DE, eds. Synopsis of gynecologic oncology. New York: Wiley, 1987; 231-255.
12. Weinreb JC, Barkoff ND, Megibow E, Demopoulos R. The value of MR imaging in distinguishing leiomyomas from other solid pelvic masses when sonography is indeterminate. AJR 1990; 154:295-299.
13. Staging announcement: FIGO cancer committee. Gynecol Oncol 1986; 25:383-385.
14. Silverberg E, Boring CC, Squires TS. Cancer statistics, 1990. CA 1990; 40:9-26.
15. Buy JN, Ghossain M, Sciot C, et al. Epithelial tumors of the ovary: CT findings and correlation with US. Radiology 1991; 178:811-818.
16. Lewis E, Wallace S. Radiologic diagnosis of ovarian cancer. In: Piver MS, ed. Ovarian malignancies: diagnostic and therapeutic advances. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone, 1987; 59-80.
17. Lewis E. Imaging techniques in gynecologic cancer. In: Rutledge FN, Freedman RS, Gershenson DM, eds. Gynecologic cancer: diagnosis and treatment strategies. Austin, Tex: University of Texas Press, 1987; 397-427.
18. Moyl JW, Rochester D, Sider L, Shrock K, Krause P. Sonography of ovarian tumors: predictability of tumor type. AJR 1983; 141: 985-991.
19. Kormano M, Grönroos M. Computer-tomographic evaluation of gynecologic tumors. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1984; 63:509-516.
20. Amendola MA. The role of CT in the evaluation of ovarian malignancy. Crit Rev Diagn Imaging 1985; 24:329-368.
21. Kalovidouris A, Gouliamos A, Pontifex GR, Gennatas K, Dardoufas K, Papavasiliou C. Computed tomography of ovarian carcinoma. Acta Radiol 1984; 25:203-207.
22. Johnson RJ, Blackledge G, Eddleston B, Crowther D. Abdomino-pelvic computed tomography in the management of ovarian carcinoma. Radiology 1983; 146:447-452.
23. Mamtora H, Isherwood I. Computed tomography in ovarian carcinoma: patterns of disease and limitations. Clin Radiol 1982; 33:165-171.
24. Whitley N, Brenner D, Francis A, et al. Use of the computed tomographic whole body scanner to stage and follow patients with advanced ovarian carcinoma. Invest Radiol 1981; 16:479-486.
25. Andreotti RF, Zusmer NR, Sheldon JJ, Ames M. Ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging of pelvic masses. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1988; 166:327-332.
26. Scoutt L, McCarthy S, Lange R, Bourque A, Schwartz P. MR imaging: utility in the evaluation of ovarian masses (abstr). Radiology 1990; 177(P):242.
27. Buchsbaum HJ, Lifshitz S. Staging and surgical evaluation of ovarian cancer. Semin Oncol 1984; 11:227-329.
28. Young RC, Fuks Z, Hoskins WJ. Cancer of the ovary. In: DeVita VT Jr., Hellman S, Rosenberg SA, eds. Cancer: principles and practice of oncology. Vol 1. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott, 1989; 1162-1196.