Oregon's Methods: Did Cost-effectiveness Analysis Fail?

JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association

Volumn 266, Issue 15, 1991, Pages 2135-2141

  Eddy, David M ^a  

^a DUKE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; HEALTH CARE FINANCING; HEALTH ECONOMICS; HEALTH INSURANCE; HEALTH PROGRAM; MEDICARE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; UNITED STATES;

CLINICAL APPROACH/SOURCE; COSTS AND BENEFITS; EVALUATION; HEALTH CARE AND PUBLIC HEALTH; INDIGENTS; MEDICAID; OREGON; RESOURCE ALLOCATION; VALUES;

CONSUMER PARTICIPATION; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; HEALTH CARE RATIONING; HEALTH PRIORITIES; MEDICAID; METHODS; OREGON; QUALITY OF HEALTH CARE; QUALITY OF LIFE; STATE HEALTH PLANS; UNITED STATES; VALUE OF LIFE;

EID: 0025937985     PISSN: 00987484     EISSN: 15383598     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1001/jama.1991.03470150107041     Document Type: Article

References (6)

1. Hadorn DC. Setting health care priorities in Oregon: cost-effectiveness meets the Rule of Rescue. JAMA. 1991;265:2218–2225.
2. Eddy DM. What's going on in Oregon? JAMA. 1991;266:417–420.
3. Goldman L, Weinstein MC, Goldman PA, Williams LW. Cost-effectiveness of HMG-CoA reductase inhibition for primary and secondary prevention of coronary heart disease. JAMA. 1991;265:1145–1151.
4. Schulman KA, Kinosian B, Jacobson TA, et al. Reducing high blood cholesterol level with drugs: cost-effectiveness of pharmacologic management. JAMA. 1990;264:3025–3033.
5. Kaplan R, Anderson J. A general health policy model: update and applications. Health Serv Res. 1988;23:203–235.
6. Eddy DM. The individual vs society: resolving the conflict. JAMA. 1991;265:2399–2406.