Time-domain observation of otoacoustic emissions during constant tone stimulation

Journal of the Acoustical Society of America

Volumn 90, Issue 5, 1991, Pages 2415-2427

  Kemp, D T ^a   Brass, David ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AUDITORY SYSTEM; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INNER EAR; NORMAL HUMAN; SIGNAL PROCESSING; STIMULATION;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ACOUSTICS; AUDIOMETRY, EVOKED RESPONSE; COCHLEA; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; HUMAN; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; REACTION TIME; SIGNAL PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; SOUND; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 0025787771     PISSN: 00014966     EISSN: NA     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1121/1.402046     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Brown, A. M. (1987). “Acoustic distortion from rodent ears: a comparison of responses from rats, guinea pigs and gerbils,” Hear. Res. 31, 25–39.
2. Grandori F.Ravazzani P. (1990). “Deconvolutions of evoked otoacoustic emissions and response nonlinearity,” in Cochlear Mechanisms and Otoacoustic Emissions. Advanced Audiology, edited by F. Grandori, G. Cianfrone, and D. T. Kemp (Karger, Basel, Switzerland), Vol. 7, pp. 99–109.
3. Guinan J.J., Jr. (1990). “Changes in stimulus frequency otoacoustic emissions produced by two-tone suppression and efferent stimulation in cats,” in Lecture Notes in Biomathematics, edited by P. Dallos, C. D. Geisler, J. W. Matthews, M. A. Ruggero, and C. R. Steele (Springer, Berlin), Vol. 87, pp. 170–177.
4. Harris F. P., and Probst, R. (1990). “Growth functions of tone burst evoked and distortion product emissions in humans,” in Lecture Notes in Biomathematics, edited by P. Dallos, C. D. Geisler, J. W. Matthews, M. A. Ruggero, and C. R. Steele (Springer, Berlin), Vol. 87, pp. 178–185.
5. Kemp, D. T. (1978). “Stimulated acoustic emissions from the human auditory system,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 64, 1386–1391.
6. Kemp, D. T. (1979a). “Evidence of mechanical nonlinearity and frequency selective wave amplification in the cochlea,” Arch. Otorhinolaryngol 224, 37–45.
7. Kemp, D. T. (1979b). “The evoked cochlea mechanical response and the auditory microstructure—evidence for a new element in cochlea mechanics,” in Models of the Auditory System and Related Signal Processing Techniques, edited by M. Hoke and E. de Boer (Almqvist and Wiksell, Stockholm, Sweden), Scand. Audiol. Suppl. 9, pp. 35–46.
8. Kemp D. T., and Brown, A. M. (1983). “A comparison of mechanical nonlinearities in the cochleae of man and gerbil from ear canal measurements,” in Physiological Basis and Psychophysics, edited by R. Klinke and R. Hartman (Springer, Berlin).
9. Kemp D. T., and Chum, R. A. (1980). “Observations on the generator mechanism of stimulus frequency acoustic emissions—two tone suppression,” in Psychophysical, Physiological and Behavioral Studies in Hearing, edited by G. van der Brink and F. A. Bilsen (Delft U.P., Delft, The Netherlands), pp. 34—42.
10. Kemp D. T., and Souter, M. (1988). “The dynamics of cochlea perturbations following brief acoustic and efferent stimulation—otoacoustic and CM data,” in Basic Issues in Hearing, edited by H. Duifhuis, J. W. Horst, and H. P. Wit, (Academic, London), pp. 116–123.
11. Kemp, D. T., Brass, D. N., and Souter, M. (1991). “Observations on simultaneous SFOAE and DPOAE generation and suppression,” in Lecture Notes in Biomathematics, edited by P. Pallos, C. D. Geisler, J. W. Mathews, M. A. Ruggero, and C. R. Steele. (Springer, Berlin), Vol. 87, pp. 202–209.
12. Neely, S. T. Norton, S. J. Gorga, M. P., and Jesteadt, W. (1988). “Latency of auditory brainstem responses and otoacoustic emissions using tone burst stimuli,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 83, 652–656.
13. Zwicker E.Schloth and, E. (1984). “Interrelation of different otoacoustic emissions,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 75, 1148–1154.