|
Volumn 51, Issue 2, 1990, Pages 425-437
|
Relitigating life and death.
a
a
NONE
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
ARTICLE;
COMPETENCE;
DEATH AND EUTHANASIA;
DECISION MAKING;
EUTHANASIA;
FAMILY;
FAMILY MEMBERS;
HUMAN RELATION;
HUMAN RIGHTS;
ILLNESS BEHAVIOR;
INFORMED CONSENT;
JUDICIAL ACTION;
JURISPRUDENCE;
LEGAL APPROACH;
LEGAL RIGHTS;
LIVING WILL;
MENTAL CAPACITY;
MORALITY;
PHYSICIAN;
QUALITY OF LIFE;
SOCIAL BEHAVIOR;
SOCIAL INTERACTION;
STANDARD;
STANDARDS;
TREATMENT WITHDRAWAL;
UNITED STATES;
COMPETENCE;
DEATH AND EUTHANASIA;
FAMILY MEMBERS;
JUDICIAL ACTION;
LEGAL APPROACH;
LEGAL RIGHTS;
SOCIAL INTERACTION;
STANDARDS;
UNITED STATES;
CIVIL RIGHTS;
DECISION MAKING;
EUTHANASIA, PASSIVE;
FAMILY;
INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS;
JURISPRUDENCE;
LIVING WILLS;
MENTAL COMPETENCY;
MORAL OBLIGATIONS;
PHYSICIANS;
QUALITY OF LIFE;
REFERENCE STANDARDS;
SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY;
THIRD-PARTY CONSENT;
TREATMENT REFUSAL;
UNITED STATES;
WITHHOLDING TREATMENT;
|
EID: 0025697816
PISSN: 00481572
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: None Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (17)
|
References (0)
|