|
Volumn 1990, Issue 2, 1990, Pages 399-482
|
Surrogacy arrangements and the conflict of laws.
a
a
NONE
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
ADOPTION;
ANTI-SURROGATE-MOTHER ACT 1989;
ARTICLE;
ARTIFICIAL INSEMINATION;
CHILD;
CHILD PARENT RELATION;
COMMERCIALIZED CHILDBEARING PREVENTION ACT 1989;
CONTRACT;
CRIMINAL LAW;
DONOR;
FEE;
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT;
GENETICS AND REPRODUCTION;
GOVERNMENT;
GOVERNMENT REGULATION;
INDUSTRY;
JURISPRUDENCE;
LAW;
LEGAL APPROACH;
MOTHER;
PARENT;
PARENTAL KIDNAPPING PREVENTION ACT;
POLICY;
REMUNERATION;
SEMEN DONORS;
SOCIAL CONTROL;
UNIFORM CHILD CUSTODY JURISDICTION ACT;
UNITED STATES;
ANTI-SURROGATE-MOTHER ACT 1989;
COMMERCIALIZED CHILDBEARING PREVENTION ACT 1989;
CONTRACTS;
FEDERAL GOVERNMENT;
GENETICS AND REPRODUCTION;
GOVERNMENT REGULATION;
LAW;
LEGAL APPROACH;
PARENTAL KIDNAPPING PREVENTION ACT;
REMUNERATION;
SEMEN DONORS;
UNIFORM CHILD CUSTODY JURISDICTION ACT;
UNITED STATES;
ADOPTION;
CHILD;
CRIMINAL LAW;
FEES AND CHARGES;
FINANCIAL SUPPORT;
GOVERNMENT;
INDUSTRY;
INSEMINATION, ARTIFICIAL;
JURISPRUDENCE;
PARENT-CHILD RELATIONS;
PARENTS;
PUBLIC POLICY;
SOCIAL CONTROL, FORMAL;
STATE GOVERNMENT;
SURROGATE MOTHERS;
TISSUE DONORS;
UNITED STATES;
|
EID: 0025618043
PISSN: 0043650X
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: None Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (4)
|
References (0)
|