Stationary Points of the Constant Modulus Algorithm for Real Gaussian Signals

IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing

Volumn 38, Issue 12, 1990, Pages 2176-2181

  Chan, Christina K ^a   Shynk, John J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MATHEMATICAL TECHNIQUES--ALGORITHMS; NOISE, SPURIOUS SIGNAL--WHITE NOISE;

CONSTANT MODULUS ALGORITHM (CMA); GAUSSIAN PROCESSES;

SIGNAL PROCESSING;

EID: 0025601385     PISSN: 00963518     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1109/29.61545     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. J. G. Proakis, Digital Communications. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1983.
2. Y. Sato, “A method of self-recovering equalization for multilevel amplitude-modulation systems,” IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. COM-23, pp. 679–682, June 1975.
3. A. Benveniste, M. Goursat, and G. Ruget, “Robust identification of a nonminimum phase system: Blind adjustment of a linear equalizer in data communications,” IEEE Trans. Automat. Contr., vol. AC-25, pp. 385–399, June 1980.
4. D. N. Godard, “Self-recovering equalization and carrier tracking in two-dimensional data communication systems,” IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. COM-28, pp. 1867–1875, Nov. 1980.
5. G. J. Foschini, “Equalizing without altering or detecting data,” AT&T Tech. J., vol. 64, pp. 1885–1910, Oct. 1985.
6. J. R. Treichler and B. G. Agee, “A new approach to multipath correction of constant modulus signals,” IEEE Trans. Acoust., Speech, Signal Processing, vol. ASSP-31, pp. 459–472, Apr. 1983.
7. B. Widrow and S. D. Stearns, Adaptive Signal Processing. Englewood Cliffs. NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1985.
8. M. G. Larimore and J. R. Treichler, “Convergence behavior of the constant modulus algorithm.” in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Acoust., Speech, Signal Processing (Boston, MA), Apr. 1983, pp. 13–16.
9. J. R. Treichler and M. G. Larimore, “Convergence rates for the constant modulus algorithm with sinusoidal inputs,” in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Acoust., Speech, Signal Processing (Tampa, FL), Apr. 1985, pp. 1157–1160.
10. C. R. Johnson, Jr., S. Dasgupta, and W. A. Sethares, “Averaging analysis of local stability of a real constant modulus algorithm adaptive filter,” IEEE Trans. Acoust., Speech, Signal Processing, vol. 36, pp. 900–910, June 1988.
11. V. Weerackody, S. A. Kassam, and K. R. Laker, “A convergence model for the analysis of some blind equalization algorithms,” in Proc. IEEE Int. Sxmp. Circuits Syst. (Portland, OR), May 1989, pp. 2136–2139.
12. J. Lundell and B. Widrow, “Application of the constant modulus adaptive beamformer to constant and nonconstant modulus signals.” in Proc. 21st Asilomar Conf. Signals, Syst., Comput. (Pacific Grove, CA). Nov. 1987, pp. 432–436.
13. J.J. Shynk and C. K. Chan, “A comparative analysis of the stationary points of the constant modulus algorithm based on Gaussian assumptions,” in Proc. IEEE Int Conf. Acoust., Speech, Signal Processing (Albuquerque, NM), Apr. 1990, pp. 1249–1252.
14. R. Price, “A useful theorem for nonlinear devices having Gaussian inputs,” IRE Trans. Inform. Theory, vol. IT-4, pp. 69–72, June 1958.
15. L. L. Horowitz and K. D. Senne, “Performance advantage of complex LMS for controlling narrow-band adaptive arrays,” IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst., vol. CAS-28, pp. 562–576, June 1981.
16. J. M. Mendel, Lessons in Digital Estimation Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1987.