The predictive value of history in dyspepsia

Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology

Volumn 25, Issue 7, 1990, Pages 689-697

  Johannessen, T ^a,b   Petersen, H ^a,b   Kleveland, P M ^a,b   Dybdahl, J H ^a,b   Sandvik, A K ^a,b   Brenna, E ^a,b   Waldum, H ^a,b  

^a TRONDHEIM UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Norway)

^b NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Norway)

Author keywords

Dyspepsia; Logistic regression; Medical history; Predictions; Score models

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANAMNESIS; ARTICLE; DRUG SELF ADMINISTRATION; DYSPEPSIA; FEMALE; FORECASTING; GASTROSCOPY; HUMAN; MALE; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; PEPTIC ULCER; QUESTIONNAIRE; AGE; AGED; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SEX DIFFERENCE;

ADULT; DYSPEPSIA; FEMALE; FORECASTING; GASTROSCOPY; HUMAN; MALE; MEDICAL HISTORY TAKING; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; PEPTIC ULCER; QUESTIONNAIRES; SELF ADMINISTRATION;

EID: 0025322420     PISSN: 00365521     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/00365529008997594     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Ulcer-like dyspepsia
2. Discriminant value of dyspeptic symptoms
3. Scoring system to improve cost effectiveness of open access endoscopy
4. Can preliminary screening of dyspeptic patients allow more effective use of investigational techniques?
5. The efficacy of endoscopy in the evaluation of dyspepsia
6. Endoscopy or radiology for upper gastrointestinal symptoms
7. Double contrast barium meal and upper gastrointestinal endoscopy; a comparative study
8. Endoscopic studies of dyspepsia in a general practice
9. Management of dyspepsia: report of a working party
10. Do young patients with dyspepsia need investigation?
11. The clinical benefit of routine upper gastrointestinal endoscopy
12. Cimetidine responders in non-ulcer dyspepsia
13. Statistical methodology for evaluating gastrointestinal symptoms
14. Prevalence of symptoms of dyspepsia in the community
15. Transferability of a computer system for medical history taking and decision support in dyspepsia
16. Do we need to listen to the patient? The predictive value of symptoms
17. Computer aided diagnosis of dyspepsia
18. Diagnostic systems as an aid to clinical decision making
19. Prospective testing of a scoring system designed to improve case selection for upper gastrointestinal investigation
20. Factors affecting the decision to consult with dyspepsia: comparison of consulters and non-consulters
21. What happens to patients with non-ulcer dyspepsia after?